A BUSETTII 86 MILE RANGE

ptd said:
well, off the top of my head, i'd say spur. upon a little reflection,i'd say it's dependant on the application, perhaps the amount of reduction. as you seem impressed with fluff, i'd say your guess is magnetic. but are you really disputing that worm drives are usually horribly inefficient ? or that this bike is full of fluff ? don't get me wrong, i like creativity. just not in advertising (as in the transmission type or the battery type), or in the expected performance department (as in the power, battery life, or range categories). there really should be some sort of consumer reports expose, as i think this kind of misrepresentation is really on the edge of fraud (with respect to performance and/or warranty).

imo, this is just a giant, that should have used the lower half of the vertical battery's area for a drive, and not just imitated the early cyclone. i like the general idea, i just bet that the quality is crap, all to make a buck off the gullible.

i'd say it's dependant on the application- bollocks

you seem impressed with fluff-more bollocks

are you really disputing that worm drives are usually horribly inefficient ?-No

i like the general idea-careful your retrogrouch persona's at stake here

THE ANSWER IS.... BEVEL GEARS ARE THE MOST EFFICIENT GEAR DRIVES.
 
amberwolf said:
briogio said:
Hold on a sec. it's NOT a hub motor :roll:

It's quite clearly under the BB and uses the crank and chain to transmit power to the back wheel. It DOES use some form of phasing to "change" gears. Criticism's easy, Einstein was criticised, most innovators are; "Always look on the bright side of life". Now I'm as much of a retrogrouch as the next man but don't let it blind you to something innovative, however badly it's executed 8)

I didn't know there was more than one version; I just went by the video linked previously (and the posts/reviews I had read of it elsewhere, any of which even mentioned the motor itself said hub, most didn't mention it as far as type--I'm sure there are other posts/reviews of the other kind but I didn't see them).

Regarding the BB drive version, having now seen it, I can't tell anything from the info I found on the web here and there about it in the last few minutes. Their website has even less information.

My guess regarding "phasing" would be that they are using dual windings in that motor, and either running them in series vs parallel, or only using one set at a time, if they are doing it inside the motor. Crystalyte used to make a hub motor like this, and a dual controller for it. I never had the motor, so I don't know how well it worked (but I think one of the old analog controllers I have in a parts bin was for that motor).

Otherwise, I'd guess a gearbox on it's output that is shifted between two ratios, though this would not be "phasing" in any way I can imagine.

Phasing itself could just be a marketing term, but until I can see how they are doing it, I couldn't say whether or not it would work like they advertise it to work. There really are a lot of marketing gimmicks out there, calling an apple an orange, instead of just telling us if it's a Macintosh or a Granny Smith. ;)


Still, based on reports of the problems of their other bike, and the reports like in that video (and a post here on ES by the same person) about not being able to get Busetti to honor their warranty, I wouldn't want to get one even if it was otherwise the perfect ebike design. ;) If they were to fix up all those problems and take care of the people with warranty issues (publicly), I'd reconsider that, but so far I don't trust them farther than I could throw one of the bikes. (I normally have a positive view of any new company, but this kind of thing turns that around fast, and makes it very hard to change my mind).




All that said, in your OP, the first question's answer is probably "no". I expect that what your'e referring to DB and others are talking about is the delta-wye switching, which has a specific ratio of change, which doesn't match any of the number claimed for this Busetti BB drive.

The other thing oft-referred to is multiple phase windings, using one set or another either by switching between them or by using multiple controllers, only one active at a time. That could give you any ratios you wanted, depending on the windings you choose, so that method could be what they used here.

But it basically "wastes" a lot of space in the motor that could be more efficiently used, by only using part of the copper-fill area for any particular set of windings. AFAIK, typically, you want to maximize the amount of copper fill around each stator tooth, for best power efficiency vs waste heat generation. If you use two independent windings instead of just one, only half (or less) of that space will now be filled with copper, as far as that particular winding, in use, will "see".

As I understand it, you don't really get "more" torque out of any particular winding by doing this, you just move the point on the motor's torque/power curve at which it still has high enough currents flowing to keep creating high torques, so that the motor's BEMF voltage won't approach the battery voltage even at the higher speeds up the hills, and so will keep trying to go faster and faster.

But doing that means also that the motor is going to get hotter a lot faster, with more current flowing thru it (and the controller and battery will also be pushed harder and the controller will get hotter), assuming that the controller itself does not have current-limiting.

Thank you amberwolf for the accurate critique, you taught me more than a thing or two in that post :wink:
 
My guess is the "phasing" thing is just an adjustable amp limit via that little control thing that looks like this...
0724bikeclosesm.jpg

They probably didn't know what else to call it (it's magic from china!) so went with "phasing" since it sounds cool. It's a neat little option but could be better. Looks like there's 3 settings...if that's right then it's probably just switching between 600w, 1200w and 1800w limits.

I can adjust the power limit on my bike (100 to 1800 watts) but it's a trimpot on the controller so not nearly as accessible, though it does allow more fine-grained control.
 
Are they really running their shifter & their grip BACKWARDS!

Someone is! :lol:

That's not a pic of the Busetti (afaik) but that little black control box thing is the same as what I saw in the video. In the lower left of the box is the power control...looks kinda like a thermometer and has 3 settings.
 
briogio said:
i'd say it's dependant on the application- bollocks
you wouldn't agree that different amounts of reduction or torque are issues ? i'm thinking that helical is about the same at higher ratios, and so if you need less units in series, you have greater efficiency, overall.

briogio said:
i like the general idea-careful your retrogrouch persona's at stake here
i meant i like the idea of mid drive, front suspension. platform, i like, execution, not so much, performance claims, BOLLOCKS, lol. and any assumption, that we're all looking for the same thing, ie, your title, invites a little ridicule and a ton of speculation.

briogio said:
THE ANSWER IS.... BEVEL GEARS ARE THE MOST EFFICIENT GEAR DRIVES.
ok, SPIRAL bevel does seem to have a tiny edge, but again, limited ratios. but now that i think about it, i did see a unit that was like an epicyclic worm type, that DID run in both directions (maybe THAT one could do regen), and claimed the same 99%, at MUCH higher ratios. ok, must do more research, lol.
 
ptd said:
briogio said:
i'd say it's dependant on the application- bollocks
you wouldn't agree that different amounts of reduction or torque are issues ? i'm thinking that helical is about the same at higher ratios, and so if you need less units in series, you have greater efficiency, overall.

briogio said:
i like the general idea-careful your retrogrouch persona's at stake here
i meant i like the idea of mid drive, front suspension. platform, i like, execution, not so much, performance claims, BOLLOCKS, lol. and any assumption, that we're all looking for the same thing, ie, your title, invites a little ridicule and a ton of speculation.

briogio said:
THE ANSWER IS.... BEVEL GEARS ARE THE MOST EFFICIENT GEAR DRIVES.
ok, SPIRAL bevel does seem to have a tiny edge, but again, limited ratios. but now that i think about it, i did see a unit that was like an epicyclic worm type, that DID run in both directions (maybe THAT one could do regen), and claimed the same 99%, at MUCH higher ratios. ok, must do more research, lol.

"you wouldn't agree that different amounts of reduction or torque are issues ?"-no, efficiency is efficiency, LOAD matters not a whit.

"invites a little ridicule and a ton of speculation"-well, I'm impressed you're handling it as well as you have, and aren't we all looking for innovations in motor and battery technology? eh mush?! Endlessly, in every Sphere???

"ok, SPIRAL bevel does seem to have a tiny edge"- that's what MOST means.

"but again, limited ratios"-and right back to the BOLLOCKS!

"must do more research"-we all do brother :wink:
 
The post made by THEFLYINGHANDLEBAR is both helpful and pertinent x 12 since there was heavy hands on use of 12 of the bikes. One would think that the company would try exceedingly hard to honor the warranty to you since surely they could foresee posts similar to what you made if their product came up short.

I suspected there was way more hype and fluff than real substance surrounding these bikes. But how could I or anyone else want to put money in one of these bikes after what you report from giving 12 of them a shot?!?!?

Amberwolf, you were spot on in addressing one by one the questions I asked. My reading of the website and the details about how these magical motors could deliver power at seemingly unreal draw rates prompted that post. You obviously have the knowledge to answer with authority the points my non-technical background already knew could not be right. Great style in your posting and in addressing with clarity.
 
My friend has got one.

He's a 'heavy' rider .. and snapped the chain about a week into it.

There is some motor / chain / gear noise.

Haven't been riding together recently so I don't know much more

I personally don't like the 'mountain bike' feel .. but my friend doesn't mind.
 
The snapped chain seems about par for the course based on the experience of the fleet owner who used 12 of these bikes.

Is your friend's Busetti one of the hub motor models or is it the bottom bracket motor model called the Vortex?
 
Yes I have test drove almost all of the Busettii Bikes. Maybe 3 years ago in the beginning some bikes still had some glitches BUT the bikes Busettii puts out now are really great. Their 48 volt batteries are running at 52 volts and so are their motors and controllers. The one exception is the Vortex bike which runs at 38 volts because it has a real built in transmission that auto shifts when needed.
The 52 volt bikes are the Big 50 Mile bike, Mini 40 mile bike and the Super 50 models. The great thing about the new Busettii 3 phase motors is that they can run at 600 watts on flats, 900 watts on hills, 1400 watts on steep hills and then go back down to 600 on the flats again. This phase shifting keeps the battery and motor very cool and not much energy is lost as heat ( on normal motors and batteries 30--40% is lost as heat). Our riding results were as follows:
Big 50 Mile bike: 47 miles no pedaling, 63 miles in pedal assit mode. Was able to climb a mile long 16 degree slope at about 15 mph steady speed no pedaling.
Mini 40 Mile folding bike: 36 miles no pedaling, 52 miles in pedal assist mode, one mile 16 degree slope at 13 mph no pedaling. after climbing the slope we checked the motor, battery and controller temp. they were all at about air temp. which was 92 degrees. The only bike we ever tried that doesn't get real hot on the upslopes. The torque output in phase 3 is almost 60 ft. lbs. thats as much as a E+ 1000 watt monster motor.
Vortex by Busettii: we got 55 miles no pedaling , 78 miles in pedal assist mode medium. Going up the 1 mile 16 degree slope the speed was 11 mph and the motor and battery were a very cool 95 degrees temp. Most bikes we have tried heat up to about 145--155 on the motor and controller and about 125 on the battery. That is all wasted heat as energy. All bikes that we test are same conditions: steady 15 mph speed, flat course ( except the hill test), 160--170 lbs. rider, wheels and brakes are adjusted properly. The Big 50 had the 52 volt 13.5 ah battery and the Vortex had the 38 volt 2 x 10 ah battery = 20 ah.
If you can eliminate waste from heat on motors and batteries then you should get 30--40% more distance per charge. Also these bikes only weigh 48--58 lbs. thats 20--30 lbs. lighter than E+ or BMC based bikes. We only tested these bikes for 3 weeks but we put over 1000 miles on them in this time. Not one glitch or problem even when we had to go very hilly courses. Busettii did move there production line to the USA 18 months ago from China because of quality problems. I think made in the USA does have some benefits here. So far its the best bike I have tested under $ 3000. If you have questions write to me at e-bike@e-bike-reviews.com Thanks, The LA Biker
 
One day a company is going to start from scratch and do this thing right... Almost like Honda did when they first entered the US w/ light motorbikes. Until that day we are stuck with this kind of crap. This is why we build our own stuff here @ ES.
 
LA Bike Fanatic said:
The great thing about the new Busettii 3 phase motors is that they can run at 600 watts on flats, 900 watts on hills, 1400 watts on steep hills and then go back down to 600 on the flats again.
I think you are probably not saying it the way you mean to, because requiring 600W just on the flats is a heck of a lot of power. My 300lb (rider+bike) CrazyBike2 might take that much to cruise at 20MPH. (less, actualy, IIRC)

Also, those numbers do not correlate with the numbers you give below for a test. If you went 15MPH at 600W with a 608Wh pack, you would only go 15 miles, with an efficiency of only 40.5Wh/mile, which is much worse than my heavy Crazybike2's 26-30Wh/mile, and that's given that my bike is in stop/start traffic at 20MPH over only a couple of miles or so (over longer distances with fewer stops/starts it is more efficient).

To go 55 miles with that same 608Wh pack, you would have to be only drawing a bit more than 1/4 of that, around 163W.

A motor outputting only 163W isn't going to get very hot, typically, even if it is very inefficient, and the same is true of it's controller and battery. So this is why you are seeing lower temperatures on those systems.

Let's say it is only 80% efficient, so that 32W of heat is produced. That will pretty easily be dissipated by airflow past the motor during a ride, so it shouldn't get very hot. So the motor does not have to be any more efficient than any other ebike motor, in order to stay cool.

So the reason those are staying cool isn't necessarily because they are that much more efficient than others, but rather that they are using very little power.

Also, since you don't state the ambient temperature, it is difficult to even estimate how much waste heat is being produced (which could probably be guesstimated by knowing the difference between ambient and motor temperatures, for those that know how to do the math on that).

Vortex by Busettii: we got 55 miles no pedaling ,
<snip>
All bikes that we test are same conditions: steady 15 mph speed, flat course ( except the hill test), 160--170 lbs. rider, wheels and brakes are adjusted properly.
<snip>
the Vortex had the 38 volt 2 x 10 ah battery = 20 ah.
So that's 760Wh total. Let's call it 80% DOD on that for 608Wh usable, to give a safety margin and not kill the cells (depending on what they are you might need more or less margin).

608Wh / 55 miles = 11Wh/mile. That would be fairly efficient. I assume this is with no stops and starts (except at the beginning and end) given that it doesnt' mention any in the conditions. So it would be somewhat worse efficiency in normal traffic conditions, requiring a lot of stops and starts, such as my ~2.2mile work commute that has around a dozen full stops and starts in it.

My guess is that it would go up to maybe 13-15Wh/mile ridden in the same commute pattern I do on CrazyBike2, which is flat, just a lot of stops and starts.

I dont' know how much it would go up to ride it at 20MPH, but probably because of wind resistance it would be another 2-5Wh/mile in addition to the above, at a guess.


The data on the Big50 is similar, though less efficient, at about 12Wh/mile. I can't say for the Mini40 because there is no battery data for it, but I expect it is similar.
 
I actually saw the staff at interbike in Las Vegas testing the Busettii Vortex Bike ! It was they not Busettii that made the claims for 86 miles in pedal assist mode medium. They posted it at the results baord for interbike testing. But here is a few things you should know about this BIKE !! It comes with 2 x 10 ah Deep cycle lithium soft pack strip cell batteries ( like the ones in the Tesla cars but MUCH smaller). so thats 38 x 20 ah = 760 Watt hours ! that is cheating a bit most bike don't have that much power. The motor only uses 250---500 watts but after running thru an actually 3 speed auto transmission the actual torque output almost is double of a normal hub mounted motor but using a smaller input of watts. At 500 watts input a hub motor usually puts out about 28 lbs. of torque. The Vortex is using a real transmission mounted together with the crank. At the same 500 watts its getting about 56 lbs. of torque instead of the normal 28. The battery, motor and controller are over spec and under regulated to creat a very cool running system with 80% heat waste than a typical motor.
Here is how they were testing all the bikes: steady 15 mph on a flat course with steady pedaling in pedal assist mode medium, 1" wide street performance tires at 95 lbs. of pressure. 160---170 lbs. well trained riders, very little wind at all and non-stop riding. Bikes like the A2B and E+ were even logging in 35 miles under these special testing conditions and they were carrying less than 760 watt hours of power. They also checked the motor and battery temps and all were up around 140 degrees except for the Vortex is was still at air temp. Heat is a big energy loss on most e-bikes. They got 86 miles out of the VORTEX BUT, it was the only bike with a worm drive 3 speed center mounted transmmision and using angled gearing. Other bikes could get the same results if they had a real transmission and carried 760 watt hours of power. Also deep cycle batteries always go about 30% farther than say a Lipo4 because of the low safety shut-off.
Really not so surprising , Thanks, PhD battery engineer
 
See this post:
http://www.endless-sphere.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=545676#p545676
regarding at least one reason why you are probably seeing less heat. Keep in mind my numbers are all guesstimates based on the little data from your first post. ;)
 
I recall a member talking about those bikes ... Everything was broken in 6 months and he was redirected to the chinese company.. And they said warrant? What is that?
 
Hmmmmm,

First post and it's everything you want to know about a product and lots of marketing material. Forgive my skepticism, but do you have a financial interest in Busetti bikes?

47 miles with 52V and 13.5AH? That's not remotely credible unless you're going at 5 miles an hour on flat roads.
 
ambroseliao said:
Hmmmmm,

First post and it's everything you want to know about a product and lots of marketing material. Forgive my skepticism, but do you have a financial interest in Busetti bikes?

47 miles with 52V and 13.5AH? That's not remotely credible unless you're going at 5 miles an hour on flat roads.

with a tail wind.
 
His address: e-bike@e-bike-reviews.com

http://e-bike-reviews.com/

This site is under construction.
 
gogo said:
His address: e-bike@e-bike-reviews.com

http://e-bike-reviews.com/

This site is under construction.

I did a Whois lookup of that site and funny, but the email address of the admin is... Wait for it...

Bike@busettii.com

You'll never guess what Busettii.com is for. :shock:
 
This guy claims his bikes, motors, and batteries are made in the USA. Yet you can clearly see Chinese characters stamped on the motor cover. While your there, check out the quality welds and stamped steel crank cover. Also the quality seat post.

http://busettii.com/vortex-mountain-ebike-6086-m6086.html

He uses Microvast batteries which are made in China.

http://www.microvast.com/contact/
 
My range on 760wh is about 39 miles at 15 mph. But that is on real world road, some wind, some stops, etc. No hard pedaling, no aero tucks, panniers.

But bear in mind, a fitter cyclist pedaling an ebike at 15 mph might be using as little as 50 watts of motor power. So a theoretical 15 miles per 100wh even if using 100w.

In my mind, another example of how far a guy can muscle power an ebike really.

I'm not knocking the bike, just knocking test conditions that aren't very real world. I've never done a range test that didn't involve up and down at least 500' of vertical. And how many of us buy an ebike because we really crave riding around at 15 mph?

Come on, test the bike at 20 mph, on a course that climbs a few hills, and rides in all 4 directions to even out any effects from wind, and includes at least a few stop signs. Bet it comes out a lot closer to what all ebikes get. I'm not saying riding in the proper gear is not more efficeint than a hubmotor that isn't. Just saying that good gears don't magically get you a waiver on the laws of physics.

I'm sure it beats most hubmotors. I will give you that. But not by double. To test an ebike, you have to at least minimize the effect the rider has on range. The best way to do that, is to test at or above 20 mph, where rider input has less a percentage of total watts.
 
Back
Top