hillzofvalp
100 kW
Yeah one was like 8.6K at room temp while the other was 9.35K or so. I have reason to believe I damaged it.. I have another in my controller I needed to readjust anyways so I'll just pop it out and use it in the motor for now.
grindz145 said:Do type K thermocouples still need a relative thermistor reading at the cold junction?
hillzofvalp said:...
I kind of like this thermistor:
http://www.ussensor.com/sites/default/files/downloads/PT103J2%20REV%20NONE.pdf
Alan B said:hillzofvalp said:I am tempted to try the 1N4148 solution.
hillzofvalp said:It says for long term use store it under 120C.. I think it's 150C rated. I like that it is 0.2C accuracy but only $7
Njay, if you have two 200C thermistors and you want to put them in series to measure 300C, what is the point? The only reason to pure them in series is to take an average in their designed temperature range that peaks at 200C
Alan B said:Thermocouples are a difficult way to go.
They require special wire and connectors. The special metal of each conductor cannot be changed all the way to the electronics.
The signals are very small and noise sensitive.
They are best for large temperature ranges and high temperatures.
They require complex / expensive signal processing on each channel (can't mux them before that).
Cost becomes a factor for a multichannel system, and four channels would be about right here for ambient, controller and two for the motor, or one for battery and one for motor. Perhaps even 6 channels.