Bullfrog said:Just a suggestion, design and offer a separate motor that will mount similarly to the BBSHD as well as the one you have...that will should cover just about every bike frame made today.
Deafcat said:Bullfrog said:Just a suggestion, design and offer a separate motor that will mount similarly to the BBSHD as well as the one you have...that will should cover just about every bike frame made today.
Unfortunately, not every bike frame will ever be compatible with this type of drive system. 157mm is the narrowest you can pull off with a dual-drive system (due to two chainlines clearing bike wheels+tires). We're using 197mm since we typically build fatbikes.
the BBSHD and BBS02 already exist, no need to reinvent the retrofit motor. Yes, these motors aren't perfect, and are designed around a fixed set of constraints which will always limit the capability of such a system. Retrofitting is inherently that way... It's better to just design and fabricate new frames.
Deafcat said:Bullfrog, we're primarily looking to sell these motors on our own bikes, many of which are built on compatible frames. Selling motors for DIY is a bonus opportunity for adoption, which I'm expecting will lead to even more variety in applications![]()
Bullfrog said:I did not mean to come across as negative in any way.
Deafcat said:Bullfrog, we're primarily looking to sell these motors on our own bikes, many of which are built on compatible frames. Selling motors for DIY is a bonus opportunity for adoption, which I'm expecting will lead to even more variety in applications![]()
raylo32 said:LOL.. and there it is. Much ado abut nothing. Totally useless motor for most of us with existing bikes.
Chambers said:coaxial..JPG Screen grab from website - Looks suspiciously like a cyclone coaxial motor to me? By reading some of the other posts you have made a bunch of upgrades to it? torque sensing for one? and a custom controller of some sort? Or am I off the mark entirely?
Nice job, there's no shame in starting with an imported motor and improving on it. Happy to see innovation from Canada, and Saskatchewan no less!Deafcat said:Sharp eye, friend! We started with those then replaced parts and output interface, changed the way the output end of spindle is supported, replaced the spindle entirely, then tackled the hall sensors.Chambers said:coaxial..JPG Screen grab from website - Looks suspiciously like a cyclone coaxial motor to me? By reading some of the other posts you have made a bunch of upgrades to it? torque sensing for one? and a custom controller of some sort? Or am I off the mark entirely?
Deafcat said:Chambers said:coaxial..JPG Screen grab from website - Looks suspiciously like a cyclone coaxial motor to me? By reading some of the other posts you have made a bunch of upgrades to it? torque sensing for one? and a custom controller of some sort? Or am I off the mark entirely?
Sharp eye, friend! We started with those then replaced parts and output interface, changed the way the output end of spindle is supported, replaced the spindle entirely, then tackled the hall sensors.
More improvements/changes going forward.
Full disclosure: the stock coax motors are riddled with problems. I wouldn't really trust building a bike around one, without extensive knowledge/experience of correcting their issues. We've devoted a lot of engineering bandwidth to improving upon them, and very pleased with the outcome.