Any one else got the 34t chainring? What do you think? What about the others, do the larger chainrings look OK?
Here are my thoughts so far:
The Photon 34t chainring is narrow-wide and 12sp compatible. It also appears to be compatible with Shimano HyperGlide chains (using SRAM Eagle on this bike though, for longevity). Note the tapered inside plates that HG chains have are accommodated by the small reliefs cut on the sides of the wide teeth.
View attachment 331991
The 34t chainring appears to be some grade of stainless steel, it is slightly magnetic – far less so than steel – and the quality of the machining and obvious difficulty getting a decent finish would suggest that quite a hard grade of stainless has been used. It looks like a machined casting or forging. In the photo you can see chunks missing from some of the teeth and variations in the metal itself. The finished surfaces that mate with the chain are quite rough, with score marks, sharp edges and burrs. The varying shape of the teeth and the poor machining tolerances are a concern.
When installing this chainring, the fit was very loose over its carrier - with play in all directions, and it took a LOT of torque to tighten the cover ring and take up the slack.
View attachment 331992
Maybe CYC have work to do in this area, particularly around some final finishing techniques that might become available if production runs increase. I don’t understand why the 34t chainring is so bad – the main crank shaft is stunning, meticulously finished and easily one of the best machined and finished pieces I’ve ever seen. In contrast, this chainring is "agricultural". Very disappointing, especially for the price.
Be interested to hear others views about the chainrings specifically.