methods
1 GW
I certainly dont want to join this battery discussion but I cant help myself.
I would take Lipo in a heartbeat over any of the other options
6S 22.2V 5Ah 25C Zippy lipo with balance taps $100
2S 2P gets you :
44.4V nominal, 50.4V off the charger
10Ah
250A continuous
$400
Will hold voltage WAY WAY WAY better than Lead or NiMh under load
They make LiFePo4 look heavy
Thousands of miles easy. I have over 1000 miles and 200 cycles so far without issue
They come with 6S balance taps and 10G wire
can be charged with any standard 48V power supply, just set it to 50.4V
Can be balanced with a $20 RC lipo balancer
Yes Dangerous
Yes Explosive
Yes high maintenance
Yes light as a feather
Yes bad-ass
Yes very high quality
Yes needs a reliable LVC
No does not need a BMS
I just needed to say that.
I really dont want to debate battery technology :?
Really. . . I dont
Probably should have kept my mouth shut. . .
Look to the RC guys
They used to use lead
Then NiCd
Then NiMh
Then Lipo
Now starting to move toward A123
No way in hell would anyone use a NiCd or NiMh in an RC plane these days. It would be a joke.
Lipo has such greater power density that the difference is measured in orders of magnitude.
LiFePo4 is overpriced right now
Especially the PING packs and other 1C / 2C packs
If I had the cash I would go A123 in a second but I am a cheap bastard so Lipo it is for me.
-methods
I would take Lipo in a heartbeat over any of the other options
6S 22.2V 5Ah 25C Zippy lipo with balance taps $100
2S 2P gets you :
44.4V nominal, 50.4V off the charger
10Ah
250A continuous
$400
Will hold voltage WAY WAY WAY better than Lead or NiMh under load
They make LiFePo4 look heavy
Thousands of miles easy. I have over 1000 miles and 200 cycles so far without issue
They come with 6S balance taps and 10G wire
can be charged with any standard 48V power supply, just set it to 50.4V
Can be balanced with a $20 RC lipo balancer
Yes Dangerous
Yes Explosive
Yes high maintenance
Yes light as a feather
Yes bad-ass
Yes very high quality
Yes needs a reliable LVC
No does not need a BMS
I just needed to say that.
I really dont want to debate battery technology :?
Really. . . I dont

Probably should have kept my mouth shut. . .

Look to the RC guys
They used to use lead
Then NiCd
Then NiMh
Then Lipo
Now starting to move toward A123
No way in hell would anyone use a NiCd or NiMh in an RC plane these days. It would be a joke.
Lipo has such greater power density that the difference is measured in orders of magnitude.
LiFePo4 is overpriced right now
Especially the PING packs and other 1C / 2C packs
If I had the cash I would go A123 in a second but I am a cheap bastard so Lipo it is for me.
-methods