--freeride--
100 W
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2011
- Messages
- 237
Better run high quality bike-parts like Shimano XT hubs or hubs with sealed bearings, if you are running that much power! And don't forget the brakes, some serious DH-disc-brakes should be used.
Interestingly, I'm still using the cantilever brakes that came with the bike and they are working very well at this point and have been the least of my concerns. I haven't ridden in the rain though and I would certainly adjust according to weather. My braking power with the the cantilevers is very good and I can certainly stop faster than a car from my top speed.--freeride-- said:Better run high quality bike-parts like Shimano XT hubs or hubs with sealed bearings, if you are running that much power! And don't forget the brakes, some serious DH-disc-brakes should be used.
kifukarider said:I have an interest in the Sturmey Archer 5 speed with built-in drum brake. I would hate to spend the money only to toast it with too much torque though.
spinningmagnets said:If you overpower an external derailleur gear-set, the chain will simply skip a tooth or two. If this damages the sprocket or the chain, they are both easily sourced and fairly affordable to replace. A spare wheel is very affordable to keep in stand-by for such occasions when someone is experimenting with max power limits after an upgrade.
I am quite fond of Internally-Geared-Hubs (IGH), but if you break a tooth, an IGH would be more expensive and time-consuming to repair/replace.
Once someone determines the gear-ratios that satisfy your goals in a build, the best move (IMHO) is to use the largest sprockets that will achieve that. This will spread the load over more teeth, and it will also allow more load to be applied before tooth-skipping (or tooth-breakage) becomes an issue.
This is why designing from the very start to have as much motor-reduction as physically possible is the right move. You can always gear-up with the chainring, and after the chainring has been enlarged as much as possible, the rear sprocket cluster can then be enlarged up to the point where your most-desired gear-ratio limits are not exceeded. The end result is the maximum possible number of teeth engaged with the chain. Longer chain and sprocket life, higher power application without breaking anything, and...even just a few extra teeth (and the larger diameter that is included), will make the drivetrain run quieter.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
There is also the consideration of adjusting the phase/battery amp ratio. By adjusting this (when using a controller that allows phase amp adjustment), you will have full power at top-speed, but...when starting out from a stop, the maximum amps will be dialed back a bit. This eliminates the ability to "wheelie" when using that setting, but...it also reduces the amount of stress on each tooth.
zaphod911 said:Ditto on that. I read somewhere in another thread that a E-S user recently paired a mid-motor with a Rohloff, but hasn't been able to post regarding long term reliability. The Sturmey 5 Speed, XL-RD5 with a 90mm Drum and a matching 90mm front + Dynamo, XL-FDD, is going to be my first real upgrade once i get my build sorted. Expect a build thread this winter.
I don't know what's going on in the small german cities, but I'll be sure to avoid them.--freeride-- said:It allways depends where you are riding. In small german cities canti-brakes are for committing suicide when you are riding arround with 3000W.
kifukarider said:zaphod911 said:Ditto on that. I read somewhere in another thread that a E-S user recently paired a mid-motor with a Rohloff, but hasn't been able to post regarding long term reliability. The Sturmey 5 Speed, XL-RD5 with a 90mm Drum and a matching 90mm front + Dynamo, XL-FDD, is going to be my first real upgrade once i get my build sorted. Expect a build thread this winter.
My impression reading the forums is that Rohloff hubs are ebike capable. At $1500 a hub, which is more than a GNG and top end battery costs, it better be. 14 speeds is way too many for an ebike though. I think 5 is about right, even 7 seems too many sometimes. The Sturmey Archer 5 speed gear range looks ideal, but it hasn't been tested yet. The thing that really holds me back is a review on amazon where a guy trashed his SA5 hub by shifting while pedaling. If that is all it takes, I don't think it could handle ebike loads. The Rohloff seems to shrug off this type of abuse.
I've had chain skipping, and it actually left the chain and sprockets no worse for wear. Also, now that I'm comfortable with derailer tuning, I fear the black box which is an IGH.
I for one am very much looking forward to it. Remember not to shift under power. I would love to see the Sturmey 5 speed succeed!!zaphod911 said:The Sturmey 5 Speed, XL-RD5 with a 90mm Drum and a matching 90mm front + Dynamo, XL-FDD, is going to be my first real upgrade once i get my build sorted. Expect a build thread this winter.
ferret said:The Nuvinci seems like a viable alternative.
More pocket friendly at around $400.
Stepless, so can have as many "speeds" as the rider wants.
Robust compared to most IGHs.
Joe T. said:ferret said:The Nuvinci seems like a viable alternative.
More pocket friendly at around $400.
Stepless, so can have as many "speeds" as the rider wants.
Robust compared to most IGHs.
I read here (http://endless-sphere.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=22216&p=801575&hilit=Nuvinci#p801575) that the Nuvinci was not up for the task. I have been looking into a IGH but I am still on the fence.
Tinto said:LR those belts and pulleys are looking like a great upgrade.
Do you foresee any crank arm clearance issues with the additional few mm?
ferret said:I would suggest placing the thermistor closer to the center of the motor, because placing it next to he case means it measures the temperature of a cooler part of the motor.
TorEddy said:If i could source the primary belt drive with matching 219 secondary reduction (eno freewheel on primary side, 11t on secondary side?), isis BB with freewheel crankarms, all in a complete package, that would be REALLY nice![]()
I have used the ACS claws and the white and the GT 120 point freewheels on my trials cranks, I can see or feel no differance, I have a GT on my GNG cranks right now and it went on without issue however it did not want to screw easily on the GNG jackshaft pulley adapter, I attributed this to poor machine work ( perhaps not? ) , I think its easy to start these fine threads crossthreaded and that leads to people having trouble, also of note is all my trials cranks are " high end" which means they are probably machined to closer tolorances however I just tried the GT, ACS claws and the original GNG freewheels on a set of cheap cranks from " Sick bike parts" and they all spin right on, Both whites I own are on trials bikes right now, sorry, not going to tear my bike down to test but I know the whites are the same. ALWAYS use Never seize !LightningRods said:[
Has anyone actually used ACS Crossfire freewheels and White Industries freewheels interchangeably? The ACS is listed as a 1.375" -24 tpi thread and the W-I as a 1.37" -24 tpi thread. Trials cranks are typically 1.37" thread and the BikeMotive cranks are 1.375". The GNG seems to be 1.375" with a metric thread per mm. I've read about Forum members stripping their crank threads all the time. Mixing and mismatching these thread sizes and pitches will do that. I need to confirm with Cyclone what their crank thread is. They offer a heavy duty five bolt freewheel but I would rather use ACS or W-I if I could.
L,R this is the freewheel i bought to replace the one in the crank and had no problems with it wat so ever,LightningRods said:TorEddy said:If i could source the primary belt drive with matching 219 secondary reduction (eno freewheel on primary side, 11t on secondary side?), isis BB with freewheel crankarms, all in a complete package, that would be REALLY nice![]()
The reason this has been taking so long is that I realized that everything needed to be done at once. One part affects another. In order to fit the 219 secondary driver I decided to move the freewheel to the big sprocket on the primary and so on. Right now only the getting the big secondary pulley printed is holding me up. I have worked a deal with Cyclone and will offer their 148mm ISIS BB with 219 drive on it.
Has anyone actually used ACS Crossfire freewheels and White Industries freewheels interchangeably? The ACS is listed as a 1.375" -24 tpi thread and the W-I as a 1.37" -24 tpi thread. Trials cranks are typically 1.37" thread and the BikeMotive cranks are 1.375". The GNG seems to be 1.375" with a metric thread per mm. I've read about Forum members stripping their crank threads all the time. Mixing and mismatching these thread sizes and pitches will do that. I need to confirm with Cyclone what their crank thread is. They offer a heavy duty five bolt freewheel but I would rather use ACS or W-I if I could.
LightningRods said:Has anyone actually used ACS Crossfire freewheels and White Industries freewheels interchangeably? The ACS is listed as a 1.375" -24 tpi thread and the W-I as a 1.37" -24 tpi thread. Trials cranks are typically 1.37" thread and the BikeMotive cranks are 1.375". The GNG seems to be 1.375" with a metric thread per mm. I've read about Forum members stripping their crank threads all the time. Mixing and mismatching these thread sizes and pitches will do that. I need to confirm with Cyclone what their crank thread is. They offer a heavy duty five bolt freewheel but I would rather use ACS or W-I if I could.