Chalo
100 TW
The energy lost to suspension damping has to come from somewhere. That's why most racing bicycles don't have suspension.
Is that so :lol:Chalo said:The energy lost to suspension damping has to come from somewhere. That's why most racing bicycles don't have suspension.
full-throttle said:Is that so :lol:Chalo said:The energy lost to suspension damping has to come from somewhere. That's why most racing bicycles don't have suspension.
Are you saying mountain bikes are not for racing? What about cross country, down hill, slalom, 4-cross, slopestyle, enduro.. etc
Enlighten us then - if this energy wasn't lost in the damper, where will it go? Will it be somehow converted into forward motion. Will it help with traction? Will it delay fatigue?
What sort of increase in efficiency? 10%, 1% 0.001%?? You are missing the point - most people especially ebike users are happy to trade a miniscule decrease in efficiency for gain in comfort. If it wasn't a race would you ride Paris-Roubaix with or without suspension?Chalo said:We're not talking about a bike that will be used for racing on rough singletrack, but for regular transportation on paved streets. For that, unsuspended bikes are proven to be more efficient.
So.. what's the punchline? Tyres on a suspended bicycle are exactly the same as on an unsuspended one. The suspension doesn't react to small irregularities you're referring toChalo said:Yes, energy stored in rolling surface irregularities can be restored to a vehicle's kinetic energy if it's not thrown away in suspension dampers.
Good choice. Rear suspension doesn't make as much difference as the front.outofsquare said:I just bought a know brand hard tail with front suspension forks
full-throttle said:So.. what's the punchline? Tyres on a suspended bicycle are exactly the same as on an unsuspended one. The suspension doesn't react to small irregularities you're referring toChalo said:Yes, energy stored in rolling surface irregularities can be restored to a vehicle's kinetic energy if it's not thrown away in suspension dampers.
onlineaddy said:Newbie question: you can't use the gears on your bike with a hub motor?
lol Do you have any scientific evidence to prove that? Not with a well set up suspension and good pedalling technique. Pedal bob is a distant past with modern designs.Chalo said:When surfaces are good and smooth, mechanical suspension throws away a lot of energy that could be used to propel the bike, or to keep it rolling
Chalo said:onlineaddy said:Newbie question: you can't use the gears on your bike with a hub motor?
So, for instance, if your donor bike has 3 x 8 speed gearing, it will be easiest to change out to a 6 or 7 speed rear shifter and matching freewheel at the time of your hub motor conversion.
Chalo
onlineaddy said:My bike actually currently has 3x7 gearing. However, I was planning on switching out the integrated shifter/brake into standalone shifter so I can use the e-brakes from the kit. The only rear shifter available is at least 8 speeds. Won't that shifter still work with a 7-speed freewheel if I just don't use the extra gear on the shifter?
john7700 said:Unless you are doing a lot of big hills or a LOT of stop and go or are building a very high powered rig, I would just forget about regen. It really isn't that useful for what you get back in energy vs. the added complexity. It is effective as a break IF you are regularly riding in conditions that merit it. Otherwise, skip regen and E-break, keep the bike much more simple and not have to switch out your shifters.
onlineaddy said:john7700 said:Unless you are doing a lot of big hills or a LOT of stop and go or are building a very high powered rig, I would just forget about regen. It really isn't that useful for what you get back in energy vs. the added complexity. It is effective as a break IF you are regularly riding in conditions that merit it. Otherwise, skip regen and E-break, keep the bike much more simple and not have to switch out your shifters.
I'm not doing it for the regen; it's the extra safety measure provided by the e-brakes that I'm interested in. If the 8-speed shifter works with the rest of the 7-speed system (rear derailleur, freewheel), then I don't mind the extra unused gear marking on the shifter.
Yes, OP, if you'd like us to take this discussion off this post, I'd be more than happy to.
onlineaddy said:I'm not doing it for the regen; it's the extra safety measure provided by the e-brakes that I'm interested in. If the 8-speed shifter works with the rest of the 7-speed system (rear derailleur, freewheel), then I don't mind the extra unused gear marking on the shifter.
full-throttle said:lol Do you have any scientific evidence to prove that?Chalo said:When surfaces are good and smooth, mechanical suspension throws away a lot of energy that could be used to propel the bike, or to keep it rolling
GrayKard said:Here's a 7 speed twist shifter: http://www.niagaracycle.com/product_info.php?products_id=418256
Here's a 7 speed thumb shifter: http://www.niagaracycle.com/product_info.php?products_id=806091
And a 7 speed trigger shifter: http://www.niagaracycle.com/product_info.php?products_id=449735
Gary
Chalo said:I think e-braking makes most e-bikes substantially less safe than normal mechanical brakes only. Regular brakes won't tear your dropouts or fork tips open and remove a wheel from your bike while you're moving.
Motor torque at the axle is already tough to manage with bicycle components. Reversing torque steps up the stresses and risks to a higher level.