Leeleeducati said:Working with Alexey on the space issue, he mentioned a back mount 160Pro S. Here's what it would look like. This I can work with.
Leeleeducati said:He said the 120Pro was less powerful than the 160Pro-S, so we should see decent performance as I think I read some very positive reviews of the 120 series. 160Pro-S will be that much better hopefully.
sn0wchyld said:Leeleeducati said:Working with Alexey on the space issue, he mentioned a back mount 160Pro S. Here's what it would look like. This I can work with.
160 looks nutts... i think ill be geting one too (still haven't even used my 100pro yet!!)
Have a look at the last post in my norko thread - there's probably a better way to save space without having the sproket mounted on the opposite side of the motor - which might not be great for the bearings + require heavier plates to bolt it too to prevent flex.
![]()
Leeleeducati said:He said the 120Pro was less powerful than the 160Pro-S, so we should see decent performance as I think I read some very positive reviews of the 120 series. 160Pro-S will be that much better hopefully.
sounds good - i'd be tempted to have it wound for a lower KV than stock - make it easier for a controller to run (higher resistance and inductance) even if it means sacrificing some power. At 5kg - if it can manage ~5kw continuous then I'd happily drop it to ~4kw (at the same voltage) to make it easier on the controller...
kiwiev said:sn0wchyld said:Leeleeducati said:Working with Alexey on the space issue, he mentioned a back mount 160Pro S. Here's what it would look like. This I can work with.
160 looks nutts... i think ill be geting one too (still haven't even used my 100pro yet!!)
Have a look at the last post in my norko thread - there's probably a better way to save space without having the sproket mounted on the opposite side of the motor - which might not be great for the bearings + require heavier plates to bolt it too to prevent flex.
![]()
Leeleeducati said:He said the 120Pro was less powerful than the 160Pro-S, so we should see decent performance as I think I read some very positive reviews of the 120 series. 160Pro-S will be that much better hopefully.
sounds good - i'd be tempted to have it wound for a lower KV than stock - make it easier for a controller to run (higher resistance and inductance) even if it means sacrificing some power. At 5kg - if it can manage ~5kw continuous then I'd happily drop it to ~4kw (at the same voltage) to make it easier on the controller...
So snow what sorted of controller are you thinking?
Cheers Kiwi
I would suggest looking at sabvoton sine wave first, the throttle controlls the phase current = smoother have a read here https://endless-sphere.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=51485.Leeleeducati said:Could someone chime in and recommend a good controller for this 160ProS that would have good smoooth control at low speed?
Emoto said:I would suggest looking at sabvoton sine wave first, the throttle controlls the phase current = smoother have a read here https://endless-sphere.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=51485.Leeleeducati said:Could someone chime in and recommend a good controller for this 160ProS that would have good smoooth control at low speed?
Lots of people using them with good results.
speedmd said:This 160 looks killer for a light weight motorcycle (mid drive ebike). The Sab. looks like a very well made/ solid controller. RPM will be limited from what I understand. A larger version of the phase runner is on my wish list for it.