liveforphysics
100 TW
Good luck on your runs my friend! Let us know how the pack did getting pushed harder.
Frank said:It's probably okay to push them a bit, often they'll sag from sitting after charge and I've always thought it was the true resting voltage you wanted to use, not necessarily the end-of-charge voltage.
coleasterling said:Maybe Luke can give some insight into that one! It's quite possible it's an anomaly of our test setup, too.
coleasterling said:In our case, we saw significant gains increasing charge voltage from 4.15V (trying to be nice to the cells) all the way to 4.3V. I've settled on the standard 4.2V per cell, but we may go a bit higher if we seem to need it. The cells we tested at 4.3V seemed fine and did have slightly better performance than at 4.2V.
Frank said:That's what I was trying to say, actually. Were they 4.3 "hot off the charger" or after resting a bit? Good luck BTW!
Frank said:FWIW: Lightning went 206 at Mohave in 2015 with an APS (i.e. streamlined tail) fairing. I went 206 at Loring with OEM bodywork in 2016. Best of luck!
Frank said:Me at Loring:
Video of a run in 2017 with cool batteries (these are Lonestar Sleeper Cells btw):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aKpPurk5L7k
Frank said:I'm pretty sure this is the Lightning at Mohave.
fechter said:Amazing the salt flats flooded. They keep whining about the Great Salt Lake drying up. Salt water and electronics is a very bad combination.
Is there someplace else you can run?