• Hello ES! We could use some help to get us past the finish line on building the new knowledgebase for the forum.
    Can you donate? Please see our fundraising page. Thank you!

Landing Gear for E-bike Contemplated?

Nehmo

🚴‍♂️ Mega poster
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
528
Location
Kansas City, Kansas, USA
I’m considering making landing gear for a 2-wheel e-bike. The base bike will be a Lectric XP 3.0. By landing gear, I mean something like training wheels, maybe without the wheels, that deploy when the bike stops. When the bike begins to move again, the landing gear retracts.

The deployment needs to be automatic, so an accelerometer and a deployment motor or a solenoid are needed.

The attachment points need to be above and in front of the rear wheel.

The 2 sides of the landing gear need to be connected by an axle, but the axle doesn’t need to be solid. One axle from each side can meet the other with a U-joint or gear connection. The axis of each axle can be horizontal, but diagonally pointing front to back. IOW, looking from the top, the vertical bar represents the rear wheel, and the slashes represent the axles:

/ | \ (The true angles of these axles would be different. This just describes the idea.)

Thus, in the retracted position, the landing gears would be near the bike frame, while in the deployed position, they would be spread out.

On an unpowered bike, the weight penalty for something like this would be prohibitive. But on an e-bike, it’s doable. Incidentally, the weight penalty can be partially offset by deleting the kickstand.

I couldn’t find much on this subject through searching. If anybody has any suggestions, please contribute.
View attachment WST-cargo_1100x_d7c361fa-e5c6-42fb-b08d-ee6043de11a2.webp
 
Last edited:
There is a thread by AussieJester (paraplegic) that at least describes his construction of this type of thing for his bike, though the pictures may all be gone (unfortunately he's no longer around and I think all his images were hosted externally).

IIRC he used a linear actuator and a button to deploy them, but it would be "easy" to use one of the ESP32's that has a built in IMU.

There is probably already code out there you could modify to detect a deceleration and/or a critically low wheel speed, or a certain amount of wobble, and trigger an action. In this case it could simply turn on a digital output and hold it there until reacceleration began, or until a certain wheel speed is reached, or wobbling stops plus a wheelspeed higher than a certain amount (must have this or it will retract once stopped because wobbling will also stop ;) ).

The LA has to be powerful enough and fast enough to move the gear down fast enough to prevent a tipover in any circumstances, and up fast enough to get them out of the way for maneuvering.


The folding action is "easy" to do by designing the struts and mounts at an angle, so the axle is not straight, but instead is a wide-open V that is disconnected at the center, and the struts connected with balljoints to the LA itself. Buuut...it'll have to be wider by far than the suggested width your post implies.
 
/ | \ (The true angles of these axles would be different. This just describes the idea.)

I am dubious that you can safely predict the level of the local ground, randomly selected by your decision to stop. A 3 or 4 or more wheel vehicle is already stable on the ground (unless you are seriously side-hill).

I'm thinking that the (wishful) reason for this is to permit keeping the operator's feet in the vehicle when stopping, perhaps in a recumbent position. I think it will throw the vehicle on it's side in some not-uncommon circumstances.
 
I’m considering making landing gear for a 2-wheel e-bike. The base bike will be a Lectric XP 3.0. By landing gear, I mean something like training wheels, maybe without the wheels, that deploy when the bike stops. When the bike begins to move again, the landing gear retracts.

The deployment needs to be automatic, so an accelerometer and a deployment motor or a solenoid are needed.

The attachment points need to be above and in front of the rear wheel.

The 2 sides of the landing gear need to be connected by an axle, but the axle doesn’t need to be solid. One axle from each side can meet the other with a U-joint or gear connection. The axis of each axle can be horizontal, but diagonally pointing front to back. IOW, looking from the top, the vertical bar represents the rear wheel, and the slashes represent the axles:

/ | \ (The true angles of these axles would be different. This just describes the idea.)

Thus, in the retracted position, the landing gears would be near the bike frame, while in the deployed position, they would be spread out.

On an unpowered bike, the weight penalty for something like this would be prohibitive. But on an e-bike, it’s doable. Incidentally, the weight penalty can be partially offset by deleting the kickstand.

I couldn’t find much on this subject through searching. If anybody has any suggestions, please contribute.
View attachment 381349
Hi.
When I built the Zing, a fully enclosed plug-in hybrid three wheeler, I first built it as a two wheeler with outriggers I could deploy via foot pedals. The difficulties in using that system lead me to put the vehicle on three wheels. A little before I built the Zing, Ecomobile made a two wheeler with automatically-deployed outriggers, under the control of a computer. I preferred something much simpler, and less reliant on the electrical system. The Ecomobile was sold with a week-long training session, largely to learn how to transition from moving to still and back. It may be worth your time to find a few Ecomobile owners to talk with.

Issues I encountered:
- The outriggers, when deployed, need to be substantially wider than the vehicle, or the vehicle can tip over on crowned roads (which means virtually every road). This means that there may not be room for the outriggers to deploy without colliding with the next vehicle over or with a curb.
- The vehicle must be leveled with respect to gravity, rather than to the road surface, Otherwise, when starting out from a stop, the vehicle will be leaning and will lurch until counter-steering becomes effective to stabilize the vehicle. This can easily lead to a collision with the vehicle beside you, or cause you to veer into oncoming traffic.
- When there is a pothole where one of the wheels deploys, many undesirable things happen. The outrigger must change its length in near instant fashion, requiring some processing power and actuator power not likely to be compatible with a very small vehicle. Consider that Teslas (at least through 2024, when I sold mine) were remarkable poor in parking near curbs, resulting in many having scraped up rims. Few of the quasi-automatic functions of my Tesla worked correctly, despite having far more processing power than appropriate for an e-bike.
- The likely rationale for wanting outriggers is to maintain streamlining in a fully enclosed vehicle. If the sides are open, then using one's legs works so much better than a complicated system. If I were committed to two wheels, then I would have cut holes in the underside of the vehicle for stabilization via my legs. However, I decided that three wheels just made more sense for many reasons, not the least of were cost and operational simplicity. The Ecomobile was fabulously expensive, and offered very little in advantages over other motorcycles.
- I was aware that with the outriggers deployed, the vehicle would steer like a car (turn right, go right) when maneuvering slowly in close quarters. Then, at about 5 mph, it would steer like a motorcycle, via counter-steering (steer front wheel right, to cause the bike to fall to the left to bank into a left turn). That transition, which was intuitive for a normal motorcycle rider, became something to think about and prepare for. I was considering commercializing the Zing, and thought that if training were necessary before even offering a test ride, selling it would be difficult. It does not surprise me that I have seen only one Ecomobile on the road in the three or four decades that they have been available.

All the issues I encountered can probably be overcome, given some careful engineering, fast processing, solid software, powerful actuators, and the intestinal fortitude to see it all through.

Lit Motors has an approach that can work, although they have been at it for over 20 years without ever producing a production vehicle. Odd that they show patently unsafe driving simulations on their website, as well as a simulated side impact that doesn't even result in a scratch on the Lit but that could easily be lethal. Our Story | Lit Motors
 
- The likely rationale for wanting outriggers is to maintain streamlining in a fully enclosed vehicle. If the sides are open, then using one's legs works so much better than a complicated system. If I were committed to two wheels, then I would have cut holes in the underside of the vehicle for stabilization via my legs.

The other common reasons I've seen this asked for (all of which applied to me except the fourth):
--legs not doing what they ought to do (or anything at all, or not even being present on one side or the other or both),
--poor enough balance for whatever reason that being able to even know you need to put your legs down
--pedal-controlled / -driven vehicle design with such a high balanced-speed that pedalling is not possible under various conditions until that speed is reached, because one is using feet to keep from tipping over or wobbling around until then.
--clipped-in feet such that it's difficult to get one's foot off the pedal and down to the ground fast enough in all necessary situations
--simple desire to not *have* to put one's legs down


BTW, one catch with any of the not-putting-one's-legs-down at a stop things is that many legal codes *require* placing at least one foot on the ground at a stop, with no exceptions listed for things such as a vehicle that doesn't physically allow this, or a body that physically cannot do so (even if they are not present to be able to do so). In the event of overly strict or even abusive LEOs, these things can be used against a rider, even if a court later dismisses them for whatever reason (but they might uphold the ticket/etc).

That legal issue is one reason (aside from the danger issues stated by Zinger and Papa) that I did not pursue adding outriggers / landing gear to CrazyBike2 once I became unable to always deal with very slow riding and starts from a stop on CB2 (which like many LWB semi-'bents is hard to get started on without the motors doing all the work, and sufficient power to get to the critical speed before wobbles or tipping begin). There were ways to "get around" this by only using them manually and only using them during low-speed operation and not at an actual stop without already having my feet on the ground. But if I had to restrict the usage, that plus the safety issues meant I was better off going to a trike for all the other reasons cargo hauling already create, so I did. :oops:
 
BTW, there are some premade types of outriggers / landing gear that have been available to add to exsting twowheelers. I don't know all of them, how well any of tehm worked in practice, or whether any are still available, but Leg-Up was one, AutoLandingGear was another.

One type of non-retractable ones I did try because I found them at goodwill for cheap was the same as SwingingWheels, which have a simple one-loop spring as part of the mount to the bike. They are basically 12" training wheels that can be setup to have a contact patch *below* the level of the rear wheel when the bike is unloaded (for a normal pedal bike; an ebike or a longbike is probably heavy enough to force the springs up even without a rider...but you can still set them up to be below the rear wheel when offground, so they still push down on uneven road surfaces, etc. )

They did not work for my purposes on CrazyBike2 (mounted in the middle under the seat because of the rear cargo pods blocking the usual spot) because of the high mass of the bike, rider, and cargo, but a more complexly-sprung version might have. Never really looked into it though.
 
BTW, one catch with any of the not-putting-one's-legs-down at a stop things is that many legal codes *require* placing at least one foot on the ground at a stop
Yeah... the only ticket I've ever gotten was for "going through a stop sign" on my bike, cause I didn't put my foot down. Turns out the motorcycle cop who got me is notorious for getting cyclists for the tiniest infractions. $200 ticket btw.
 
I'm OP, and the responses in this thread have convinced me to point my inventiveness in a different direction. Zinger summed it up by saying what's needed: ".. some careful engineering, fast processing, solid software, powerful actuators, and the intestinal fortitude to see it all through."
 
Back
Top