You know, based on my experience with the 750W, I bet the 1000W Lightest motor at 1200W feels very, very, close to the mighty BBSHD at 1600W.
In my view, because it is already so loud and conspicuous, I should have just gone with the 1000W config. Damn, I wish I did... just to try it.
Exactly. My point was that because a larger motor pinion would make the motor spin slower, it would make the top speed higher for offroad use. Also the larger motor pinion would slightly raise the chain and give more clearance for a larger chainring. Maybe it would only be suited to 1000W and/or high torque version.The larger pinion would make the motor spin slower, but the cadence will always be set by the chainring dimension
I wish we could do that. The fact is that on the drive side we have already the freewheel which takes some space. Adding a PAS in there would impact on the Q factor. On the other side that's not happening.View attachment 350036
I would have to give up my HXR easyshift crankset to get PAS with the dual chain setup. I am not a fan of this PAS device. It is all-in-one at the expensive of f*cking up your q-factor. Not good. A place to mount a PAS sensor could have been designed into the drive-side motor mount, and the magnets could be a 1mm-to-2mm thick 24 point disk hidden behind the chainring. This is yuck. I hope a better solution can be spliced into the plug.
Here's a thought.
Many people with long term mid drive experience don't like sprockets below 14T because they wear too fast.
But we really need these tiny gears to hit the top speed of the motor and a big chainring..
How about using an IGH to achieve the correct gearing and keep that short mount..
IGH will typically have a 19T or 21T sprocket..
This is good because it will raise your chainline and make it so you can fit a bigger sprocket and reduce that pedaling RPM.
Just read this article: Mid Drive Kits, Dump the Derailleur and get an IGH?
Quick summary.. for the power level of the BBSHD they would recommend a 3 speed.. which sounds funny.. but people with BBSHDs end up using 2-3 gears anyway.. and we have that kind of power..
On my kit with a 48T front, 14T rear, and a 33% increase/decrease possible in the gearing, it'd work out like:
Gear 1 - 16mph
Gear 2 - 23.8 mph
Gear 3 - 31.6 mph
If i swap to a 50T front chainring then my top speed is 33.7mph which may be beyond the continuous limit of the motor.. so there's a lot of headroom to move the gearing now
Some people seem to have success with 8 speed IGH and high power drives. The Shimano Alfine 8 would be next on the list of IGH to consider, but is 3x the cost of a 3 speed IGH.
We can do that. I sent you an email. If you want we talk about it, and other topics, on Whatsapp!@Pilot Engineer does the new firmware allow the PAS pole number to be programmed by the end user?
Guys,
None of this talk addresses the noise problem.
Did you miss this post?
'lightest.bike' 1.7kg 1000w mid driv
OK, both tasks done.
Lightest top speed throttle only on flat with 29" wheels and 52V battery: 27.3 mph (via GPS) (Edit: mine is the 750W version)
Test ride on wife's GRIN-based torque sensor bike: totally different feel. The pulse...pulse...pulse feeling is not there like it is on the Bikee. Wife's bike has steady and consistent PAS based on effort. Felt very nice actually. Bikee doesn't compare. I don't know why.
That 38mph on the photon is unloaded, right? The lightest kit in my most recent testing did 38mph unloaded and 28-29mph real world on flat terrain. I have trouble believing that the photon achieves 38mph real world on throttle. That is hard for me to achieve on a stock BBSHD.