jedadkins@hotmail.com said:
if i am not completely wrong most controllers limit speed by limiting the power draw of but this would also limit maximum torque correct?
No. CONTROLLERS limit speed based on the wind (Kv, motor constant) and the voltage fed into that (Kv)wind. This is for general cheap non fancy controllers, that use PWM in the commutation.. ( most). Fact is, more voltage on the same controller interprets to more speed.. inherent to the motor Kv....
THROTTLE controls either ( speed based like Infineons) speed or amps ( like some others, Kelly, Tq control ) or both (a blend). The PWM duty cycle I talk about is a pulsing current and power of the processor algorithm dependent on the throttling input..... of the transistors to power the motor in sequence... (simplified explanation). Most motors dont like running at very low, or maxxed out PWM. Finding a happy medium is up to how the controller handles the throttle input and outputs its current for teh desired speed/load... and not running hot ( waste heat in motor)..... (efficient setup)..
For instance I run at 35mph at 2400w, or about ~80% of my controllers max, and that is at the maxxed out Kv for my hub. Wont go any faster at top speed, load is low, so current drops, and I cruis in a 70+% efficiency range at that speed for my hub and this wind. If my hub was 12Kv ( mph unloaded) instead of 8.5 ( 50mph unloaded), I would go faster but stress the controller. If it was lower ( 4Kv) (25mph unloaded) I would have NO top speed and probably wouldn't load up the controller much at all or use many amps cruising.. (you will just run out or KV rpm at like 20mph) and the low duty cycle.
If I used a bigger wheels, the max speed would be higher and teh load greater, and the pwm higher, and the possibility of the pwm maxxed out at 100% more time than I would like, and controller stressed.. ( controller killin zone?) If you choose to slow the motor by throttle manipulation, ( like a CA3) the motor may run in an even more inefficient zone and ( 25-40%?) and heat will be created ( in motor)( based on the nature of the wind) and the controller amps are just how fast you get there ( to the speed limit) where they will drop when the acceleration load is tapered.
My bike takes 100A for the burst peak speed but hits a happy 25mph where teh tq ( 1/2 my unloaded rpm) falls and I slow acceleration to max loaded speeds. ( 35-42mph) ( voltage maxxed out Kv ( 8.5rpm/volt for me) wind here) cruising, not stressing the controller (2400w/3300w outpt) and not stressing the hub ( 70-85% eff. range) I cruise at much less, 20-40A, the duty cycle on the controller is lower, and my controller has active freewheeling so it doesn't mind low speed /duty cycle commutation, but that is a whole other area of controller theory ( active/passive freewheeling)(low duty cycles not being hard on controller) ( cheap controllers dont like low duty cycles, like RC controllers, that blow right away at low duty cycles without freewheeling when not run at 80-90%pwm where they like to run) .
The Ca3 will absolutely give you speed limit functionality if you want, too. I hope someone corrects me if I am wrong.