Lithium Ion Develpment - 10x Capacity

sparky

100 mW
Joined
Aug 26, 2008
Messages
40
Location
chaska, mn
Some interesting stuff. "10x storage capacity" Not sure if that means Ah, but it sounds promising...hopefully sooner than later... :?

http://www.pddnet.com/news-news-storage-material-improves-energy-density-of-lithium_ion-battery-110209/
 
going to post this here because I forget a lot.I read many daily reports on batt tech and bizz.A simple google alert on lithium is a good daily jump start.some days old news but you can follow trails.
 
Silicon nanowires and now Silicon gel. You would think that silicon is going to make lithium significantly better eventually. :roll:

I give substantial energy density improvements ... within 10 years. I can only hope.
 
sparky said:
Some interesting stuff. "10x storage capacity" Not sure if that means Ah, but it sounds promising...hopefully sooner than later... :?

http://www.pddnet.com/news-news-storage-material-improves-energy-density-of-lithium_ion-battery-110209/

And, oh yes, that means "Ah". It really means Wh, but if the voltage is the same, then it's equivalent to Ah.
 
Hmm, silicon between "graphite substrate", like between these layers.
 

Attachments

  • LIFEPO4_cell_opened-up_007.jpg
    LIFEPO4_cell_opened-up_007.jpg
    27 KB · Views: 1,445
gilnet said:
...A simple google alert on lithium is a good daily jump start.some days old news but you can follow trails.

Thanks, I'll give it a try. Seems like batteries, more than anything else batteries are the weak link....
Then again, if we had super powerful motors (room temp superconducting...?) then our existing batteries may just be awesome :D
 
sparky said:
gilnet said:
...A simple google alert on lithium is a good daily jump start.some days old news but you can follow trails.

Thanks, I'll give it a try. Seems like batteries, more than anything else batteries are the weak link....
Then again, if we had super powerful motors (room temp superconducting...?) then our existing batteries may just be awesome :D

They'd be awesome in power density, assumably, but it wouldn't affect your range significantly like this battery advancement would. Most of the energy spent is due to irrecoverable losses due to air drag and other sources of friction and only a small percentage is spent due to motor losses assuming you have a reasonably efficient motor and drive setup. (I don't consider most direct drive hub motors on bicycles reasonably efficient setups for hills. Geared motors tend to be far better in this regard.)
 
Lithium sulfur promises a longer charge, and safer operation, compared to standard lithium batteries.
By Phil McKenna
Friday, March 12, 2010

Researchers at Stanford University have developed an electrode that can be used to make more energy-dense lithium-sulfur batteries. If issues surrounding life-cycle deterioration can be addressed, the battery could resolve performance and safety issues limiting the spread of longer-lasting batteries in hybrid and electric vehicles.

Power pack: The lithium-sulfur battery shown here has the potential to last four times as long as lithium-ion batteries.
Credit: Yuan Yang, Stanford University
In 2007, researchers at Stanford University, led by materials science professor Yi Cui, devised an electrode made of silicon nanowires that could hold 10 times as much charge as conventional lithium-ion batteries. But for the device to realize its full potential, battery developers sought a corresponding cathode that could store electrons in similarly high densities.

Now the same Stanford team thinks they have found their answer: a proof-of-concept lithium-sulfide cathode with 10 times the power density of conventional lithium-ion cathodes. Together, the anode and cathode could yield a battery that lasts four times as long and is significantly safer than existing lithium-ion batteries. The new battery cannot realize 10 times the energy storage capacity because the new cathode has significantly lower conductivity than the lithium metals used in conventional batteries.

But by using lithium sulfide, a non-metallic form of lithium, instead of a lithium metal, the researchers have overcome a key safety issue that has plagued lithium-metal batteries. During normal battery use, lithium metal can grow branchlike structures that can penetrate a thin polymer layer that separates the battery's two electrodes. When this occurs, the battery can short-circuit and potentially explode. With lithium sulfide, the branching does not occur.

To fabricate their lithium-sulfide cathode, the researchers started with a novel carbon-sulfur nanostructure cathode that was recently developed by researchers at Waterloo University in Ontario. Then they heated the carbon sulfur nanostructure in the presence of n-butyl lithium to form the lithium-sulfide cathode. Others have tried using lithium-sulfide cathodes in the past, but experienced serious problems with the material's conductivity. These were partly overcome with the new nanostructure design.

By combining the new cathode with the previously developed silicon anode, the team created a battery with an initial discharge of 630 watt-hours per kilogram of active ingredients. This represents an approximately 80 percent increase in the energy density over commercially available lithium-ion batteries, according to Stanford's Cui, who was a coauthor of a paper describing the work published last month in Nano Letters. Further increases in energy density--as much as four times that of lithium-ion batteries--are theoretically achievable by optimizing the battery's electrodes, Cui says.

The new battery still has significant issues, particularly in maintaining capacity. After just five discharge and recharge cycles, the cells lost one-third of their initial energy storage capacity and ceased to function after 40 to 50 cycles. The loss is likely due to polysulfides, chemicals that form during normal discharging and recharging. If allowed to dissolve into the battery's liquid electrolyte, polysulfides can poison the battery by blocking future charging and discharging. "This is a huge issue," Cui says. "We are making some great progress, but we certainly aren't there yet to compete with current technology in terms of cycle life."

Full article and original URL:
http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/24758/page1/

tks
lok
 
Company formed to develop this innovation:
http://www.amprius.com/
mentioned here:
http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/23893/page1/
 
Why not take the UMICH course on NanoManufacturing:
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=umich+me+599+1.&aq=f
 
Lock said:
Now the same Stanford team thinks they have found their answer: a proof-of-concept lithium-sulfide cathode with 10 times the :roll: power density :roll:of conventional lithium-ion cathodes. Together, the anode and cathode could yield a battery that lasts four times as long and is significantly safer than existing lithium-ion batteries. The new battery cannot realize 10 times the :roll: energy storage capacity :roll: because the new cathode has significantly lower conductivity than the lithium metals used in conventional batteries.

lok


It seems the world has never yet found a reporter to write a blip on some battery technology that actually has a clue wtf they are writing about, or at least one that understands the difference between power and energy.
 
Back
Top