You want one log per millisecond? Ok. 1Ks/S. ( kilosamples per second) Thats very slow sampling for some machinery.
DSo...
... or M series DAQ? The M-Series can do a sampling of 1.25 MEGAsamples per second ( 1.25 million per second).... 60 VDC continuous bank isolation, 1,400 Vrms/1,950 VDC channel-to-bus isolation, withstand for 5 sec. 3800$ - 6000$. Used, sell for 1200$ish.
1000+ sampling per second is oscilloscope territory...or a DAQ.
For 100$ you can get a 100kS/sec DAQ datalogger for that voltage. IF you know how to use it.
Example: You would have to design the analog side of the data array: but, this thing is not exactly slow.
https://www.dataq.com/products/di-...IKDVxLWgwyz7xqCAgIE-YvmMVH8KXgTBoCjXIQAvD_BwE
Consumer grade? Well, there is Extech ( a division o FLIR) typical 1 log per second... Or my Flir Bluetooth multimeter, can do 3 sample per second... ... Or the Cycle analysts... My CA3 does 10 samples/sec. This is the fastest current and voltage on a easy spreadsheet that I have... There is some documentation of a use of a faster rate for the system, think I read somewhere? Certainly the clock rate can handle it.. and the CA3 is capable of more I bet... Lol. I am very happy with the 10Hz.
1Hz or 10Hz data output rate for data logging. The 10Hz rate shows more interesting vehicle dynamics at the cost of large data files.
IDK. All the consumer grade thingies like to do 1 log per sec for some reason...
Digital storage oscilloscopes are very useful...
......... Nothing like my Tektronix 422. Nothing like it. That, 15 MHz, top of the line '1965.... ..... Nowadays we have 100 gigaherze.. top of the line oscilloscopes.... Lol. 100 GIGA hertz.... (10^9 Hz, = 1GHz).. (1GHz = 1,000,000,000 Hertz) (100 x 1,000,000,000 (a billion) times per second)... (100 billion times per second, 100 GHz)..... I bet that would leave a little dent in your SD card.
Can I ask why? I, also, am quite intrigued by the idea of capturing and analyzing the data from the output of a motor controller:... and having a recod is quite valuable... ? Have been. You will only average the RMS and not see the peak without an ( faster) oscilloscope? Or something faster than the brush less FOC controller PWM rate ( usually 12-18kHz). ( 12-18000 Hertz)... I have never owned a very fast DSO: But am looking at getting one.. ( Rigol?) Whattya trying to accomplish? A direct measurement of each wave pulse from the controller bridge, before the DC current gets through the diode? I think you would need to have something that can measure faster than the PWM rate f the microchip output (driver) on the (driven) bridge. maybe I don't understand or know enough but this is something that interest me too.
My true RMS clamp meter ( Seaward Solar) can measure harmonics ( very useful... when pwm through an inverter bridge... )(dirty signals and false readings) ( Ghost voltages?) , up to the 25th Order: voltage, current and power, at the push of a button... AC, DC, or AC+DC, power factor; Pretty good, peak and hold too. Does not data log, but my FLIR does.. and that is 3 log / sec. true rms.. on a 1200$ meter. So I think the makers thought there was no reason for a higher sampling rate.Even for a 1000$ + meter? Only 3 sample per second data logged ... The files stay small. Very slow compared to a real scope... 3s/Sec. You ask for 1000 s/Sec.. ( 1Ks/Sec sampling rate, a log every millisecond)... So I think this is DSo or DAQ territory for those that know how to use these systems.