teslanv said:The MXUS 3000W motor is now on the ebikes.CA simulator.
Select "MXUS 4504_V2"
90% peak efficiency.
90% is really impressive for a relatively cheap motor. Nice work MXUS! Can't wait to see how the Quanshun motor compares. Thanks Justin!
MXUS 3000 Hub Motor - V1 V2 V3
- Thread starter Allex
- Start date
90% is really impressive for a relatively cheap motor. Nice work MXUS! Can't wait to see how the Quanshun motor compares. Thanks Justin!
Doctorbass
100 GW
I think that i'll order two 3t or 4T for my 2Wd setup.. i'll have to rework one of the axel as well. I also need to get a quote for the spoke length for a sunrim doubletrack 24"..
According to the ebike sim.. it's about 500 pounds of trust at 140A batt and 350A phase per controller with dual motor
.. well that's if the front wheel can grip enough.. withc will require some traction control tuning to keep max traction for drag racing tests:wink:
According to the ebike sim.. it's about 500 pounds of trust at 140A batt and 350A phase per controller with dual motor
.. well that's if the front wheel can grip enough.. withc will require some traction control tuning to keep max traction for drag racing tests:wink:why not get the front motor with a speed wind and the rear motor with a torque wind
the front motor will have no traction from a standing start anyways
this will also be more efficient for general cruising. the reason the P85D doesn't every actually make 691HP peak on the dyno is because the powerbands of the two motors are not "aligned". This is also why the P85D can also go 155mph now. This is also better for the battery as peak power draw is also less
the front motor will have no traction from a standing start anyways
this will also be more efficient for general cruising. the reason the P85D doesn't every actually make 691HP peak on the dyno is because the powerbands of the two motors are not "aligned". This is also why the P85D can also go 155mph now. This is also better for the battery as peak power draw is also less
teslanv
1 MW
Building such a 2WD now.
Let you all know how it goes.
Let you all know how it goes.
Doctorbass
100 GW
flathill said:
Great Idea.. but it's similar to reducing the torque on the front motor for a given speed band... and the rear slower wind motor will fall in generator mode if the front motor is faster... unless the max theorical speed is under the speed the BEMF reach the battery volts..on both motor..
But yes probably that the front motor would contribute to the acceleration and top speed starting at a given speed.
The reason for a 2WD is because it is impossible to get a motor that can give twice output power on the rear wheel without monstrous size and weight witch is a real CONS... 2WD would be more balanced weight. and I would not have 50 pounds suspenden on the rear swingarm!
Doc
Rix
100 TW
teslanv said:The MXUS 3000W motor is now on the ebikes.CA simulator.
Select "MXUS 4504_V2"
90% peak efficiency.
Given same volts/amps input, numbers are almost identical to the TC4080 and % more efficient doing it, and at half the price, the MXUS 4T is a better deal.
ozman
100 W
Will Justin add the MXUS 3000 to the spoke calculator now he has the motors in his hands
teslanv
1 MW
[youtube]kIo0g0OSYy8[/youtube]
teslanv
1 MW
3T MXUS with upgraded phase wires, 21.5" Moped Racing tires, ~100V on my 18X4110 Infineon, 80A Battery, 180A Phase Current.macribs said:
Ohbse
10 kW
What was the time?!
Have you got the full timeslip? or just going for top speed? Did you do several runs?
Have you got the full timeslip? or just going for top speed? Did you do several runs?
teslanv
1 MW
Ohbse said:
20.162 seconds for the 1/4 mile.
Reaction time of 0.282 seconds.
53.61 mph in the 1/8th.
Ohbse
10 kW
teslanv said:
Did you get a 60' time? 1/8th mile ET? Were you full throttle off the line or did you need to roll on to avoid wheelie? I was really hoping you would beat Doctor B :lol: Well done on the race and congratulations on cracking 60.
There's plenty more speed/power to be had with a better controller
120/300 @ 100v with one of the new generation sabvoton 96v units should result in slicing at least a couple of seconds off your ET
Doctorbass
100 GW
Nice performance!
You can now post your official drag racing time here! 8)
http://endless-sphere.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=20592
In the past i did 19.875 and 65mph
And i m sure that with more batt current you will increase your top speed and get a little better time run.
You can now post your official drag racing time here! 8)
http://endless-sphere.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=20592
In the past i did 19.875 and 65mph
And i m sure that with more batt current you will increase your top speed and get a little better time run.
teslanv
1 MW
Here's the ticket.
wesnewell
100 GW
I only find the MXUS F07 on ther sim.
teslanv
1 MW
Try it on a desktop computer. Its not on the mobile version of the simulator yet, for some reason.wesnewell said:
markz
100 TW
So I can assume the ebikes.ca listing on motor simulator is 4504_V2, check this out........crazy!
20% grade, overheats in 4 minutes @ 12km/h.......crazy!
20% grade, overheats in 4 minutes @ 12km/h.......crazy!
teslanv
1 MW
Try that same simulation with a crown TC40100.markz said:
Any motor will overheat if you put it through that torture.
Doctorbass
100 GW
this is just a question of heat loss..
In this case the diff bwetween the motor output power and input electrical power is 1.4kW.. so thi smena it'S like puting a 1.4kW heater in your motor... i think it is normal it will overheat in 4 minutes.. that's about 0.34 megajoules to dissipate at a crazy low speed of air...
One question.. Where is located you 20% grade 1.4km long hill ? :| it should be about 900fts high.
Doc
In this case the diff bwetween the motor output power and input electrical power is 1.4kW.. so thi smena it'S like puting a 1.4kW heater in your motor... i think it is normal it will overheat in 4 minutes.. that's about 0.34 megajoules to dissipate at a crazy low speed of air...
One question.. Where is located you 20% grade 1.4km long hill ? :| it should be about 900fts high.
Doc
Similar threads
