Punx0r said:Where will it stop???
It's not the media convincing me, It's the quakes. They started fracking and the ground started shaking. It is very hard to put a spin on that.Punx0r said:I'm happy to ignore anything said by *either* side in the fracking debate unless accompanied by credible, peer-reviewed sources.
sauce: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/research/induced/A team of USGS scientists led by Bill Ellsworth analyzed changes in the rate of earthquake occurrence using large USGS databases of earthquakes recorded since 1970. The increase in seismicity has been found to coincide with the injection of wastewater in deep disposal wells in several locations, including Colorado, Texas, Arkansas, Oklahoma and Ohio. Much of this wastewater is a byproduct of oil and gas production and is routinely disposed of by injection into wells specifically designed and approved for this purpose.
Hydraulic fracturing, commonly known as “fracking,” does not appear to be linked to the increased rate of magnitude 3 and larger earthquakes.
Although wastewater injection has not yet been linked to large earthquakes (M6+), scientists cannot eliminate the possibility. It does appear that wastewater disposal induced the M5.3 Raton Basin, Colorado earthquake in 2011 as well as the M5.6 quake that struck Prague, Oklahoma in 2011, leading to a few injuries and damage to more than a dozen homes.
Punx0r said:Where will it stop???
chvidgov.bc.ca said:Thanks Josef C. That was an astute "take" on things. I heard 35 could be the low! From the CEO of Canadian Natural Resources no less, only a couple of weeks ago. That's a lot of downside in this sullen oil market. I better hedge some of my Canadian dollars on this next face-ripper rally in crude that lasts for a day or two.
These guys will frack with anything. In 1967 with the help of the US gov they dropped a 29 kiloton nuke 3/4 of a mile down a gas well in New Mexico. The mega frack resulted in 160 foot diameter cavity that flowed gas but the gas was radioactive. They experimented with larger nukes, even 3 nukes at a time, all with promising results. The madness only stopped (or slowed) when someone realized that "even if the well flowed gas for 25 years we will never recoup the cost of the nuke". I'm not sure what they ever did with the gas.Joseph C. said:dnum, I think you are understating the risks Fracking poses. The U.S. EPA have found numerous contamination issues and the whole sector is only in its infancy - which suggests to me that the problem will only get worse. No one even knows what the companies are using for their hydraulic fluids. Therefore, it's hard to quantify the level of stupidity operating when it comes to something as vital as water in a country that has large swathes of it in drought.
Nevada not New Mexico only one Nuclear bomb ever went off in NM.edcastrovalley wrote: These guys will frack with anything. In 1967 with the help of the US gov they dropped a 29 kiloton nuke 3/4 of a mile down a gas well in New Mexico. The mega frack resulted in 160 foot diameter cavity that flowed gas but the gas was radioactive. They experimented with larger nukes, even 3 nukes at a time, all with promising results. The madness only stopped (or slowed) when someone realized that "even if the well flowed gas for 25 years we will never recoup the cost of the nuke". I'm not sure what they ever did with the gas.![]()
I like the website you found. Very interesting. I like how they made a national park out of the well site. :lol:wineboyrider said:Nevada not New Mexico only one Nuclear bomb ever went off in NM.I think I found the one your are talking about? Interesting?http://aoghs.org/technology/project-gasbuggy/
Looks like it, yeah it's that's pretty interesting.wineboyrider said:Nevada not New Mexico only one Nuclear bomb ever went off in NM.edcastrovalley wrote: These guys will frack with anything. In 1967 with the help of the US gov they dropped a 29 kiloton nuke 3/4 of a mile down a gas well in New Mexico. The mega frack resulted in 160 foot diameter cavity that flowed gas but the gas was radioactive. They experimented with larger nukes, even 3 nukes at a time, all with promising results. The madness only stopped (or slowed) when someone realized that "even if the well flowed gas for 25 years we will never recoup the cost of the nuke". I'm not sure what they ever did with the gas.![]()
I think I found the one your are talking about? Interesting?http://aoghs.org/technology/project-gasbuggy/
dnmun said:first estimates of job losses in Texas are about 125,000 jobs with average pay about $110,000 with truckers starting around $80k up to overtime roustabouts and specialists of around $125k.
so now we are talking about restaurants which just financed expansions going under, car dealerships with hundreds of trucks they will have to find and repo as workers move to the far ends of the country looking for work.
entire residential neighborhoods with house prices dropping 5-10% in months and foreclosed properties piling up like las vegas all over again.
but Prius sales are down 13% and hummer sales and big pickup truck sales have exploded nationwide.
but i think the bottom is in at $53.60.
Arlo1 said:You guys don't think they want to keep it a little lower for now on to try to help people feel ok about purchasing gasoline vehicles?
You are talking about 90% of the public dude. I try to teach them as much as I can but most of my friends are sick of hearing about electrics...Joseph C. said:Arlo1 said:You guys don't think they want to keep it a little lower for now on to try to help people feel ok about purchasing gasoline vehicles?
Anyone that buys a car based on temporary low oil prices is an idiot. They will be this low for a month or two tops but they will be high > $100 per barrel permanently.