My economy in my own destiny now as I know how much power each assist level is going to give me. The power steps are very uniform and predictable with this setup. Interestingly, 130W is the very lowest assist level I can set. I did have "0" assist at 5% current but it made no difference compared to "0" at 10% current
So the assist Wattages are as follows with this setup (750W BBS02).
Assist 0>>>>>10>>>>>130W
Assist 1>>>>>15>>>>>160W
Assist 2>>>>>20>>>>>200W
Assist 3>>>>>25>>>>>250W
Assist 4>>>>>30>>>>>300W
Assist 5>>>>>40>>>>>400W
Assist 6>>>>>55>>>>>550W
Assist 7>>>>>70>>>>>700W
Assist 8>>>>>85>>>>>850W
Assist 9>>>>100>>>>>1000W
Personally I am not a fan of having a control strategy that reduces current with increased cadence. I can see the thinking behind it for providing improved economy though. It also gives you a bit of a boost getting up to speed and backs the power off once you are up to speed. Without having a torque sensor, its probably the best way you can simulate the torque effect through the pedaling range.
For me though,if I am pedaling at a higher cadence, its to increase my road speed. Subsequently it becomes counter productive to then reduce the assist when in reality, this is the time I actually need the assist to give me the best chance of sustaining this increased speed.
Try bumping up the Slow Start Model if your looking for a faster PAS start up ramp.
Been up and down the range of settings here already. I might do a bit more experiment here but so far I have found keeping Slow-Start mode in its mid range keeps the starting transition nice and smooth with the increase in starting current giving it a nice subtle boost on startup.