do you think an X503 would be too much?
monster 100 kW Joined Jun 17, 2007 Messages 1,411 Oct 24, 2007 #1 do you think an X503 would be too much? Attachments Dsc00293.jpg 49.9 KB · Views: 1,168
xyster 10 MW Joined Jan 2, 2007 Messages 3,089 Location Visualize Rural Sheep Oct 24, 2007 #2 Front or rear?
Miles 100 TW Joined Mar 16, 2007 Messages 11,031 Location London UK Oct 24, 2007 #3 xyster said: Front or rear? Click to expand... Both, of course...
lazarus2405 10 kW Joined Sep 5, 2007 Messages 782 Location Rochester, NY Oct 25, 2007 #4 What's that, a 30" front? Hmm, get a 5305 and custom lace it in the front wheel... Remove the pedals since there's no freewheel, and weld on your own pegs for footrests. And... the ridiculously short wheelbase just means it can make tighter corners at high speeds, right?
What's that, a 30" front? Hmm, get a 5305 and custom lace it in the front wheel... Remove the pedals since there's no freewheel, and weld on your own pegs for footrests. And... the ridiculously short wheelbase just means it can make tighter corners at high speeds, right?
monster 100 kW Joined Jun 17, 2007 Messages 1,411 Oct 25, 2007 #5 the wheel base could easily be extended by about a meter or so. maybe put another seat on it?
TylerDurden 100 GW Joined Jan 4, 2007 Messages 7,176 Location Wear the fox hat. Oct 25, 2007 #6 If you made the main-tube the battery case, then you'd have a winner.
C cerewa 100 W Joined Oct 25, 2007 Messages 159 Oct 26, 2007 #7 you could put the same kind of hubmotor in each wheel, and then you'd have a hillclimber motor (rear) and a high-speed motor (front).
you could put the same kind of hubmotor in each wheel, and then you'd have a hillclimber motor (rear) and a high-speed motor (front).