TylerDurden
100 GW
Really.green hornet said:If LifeBatt can do it, I can do it![]()
Harmon at least has some modecum of sociability.
Really.green hornet said:If LifeBatt can do it, I can do it![]()
green hornet said:Shhhh,
I don't want to break anybodies love affair w a1234....
but this whole a123 lovefest was out of control,
just do the math.
If LifeBatt can do it, I can do it
I'll put my cell up against a123 anytime.
I'll even do a one time offer for group purchase ~9+ each
end of posting on this
No one can answer until you post some specs...aside from cost per amp hour.green hornet said:soooo, you like ?
Hey mate,green hornet said:Shhhh,
I don't want to break anybodies love affair w a1234....
but this whole a123 lovefest was out of control,
just do the math.
If LifeBatt can do it, I can do it
I'll put my cell up against a123 anytime.
I'll even do a one time offer for group purchase ~9+ each
end of posting on this
green hornet said:Big Q - Do people who pay $11 per M-1 cell really NEED 40C discharge for their e-bikes....No
Then why do they pay too much for them when it's not necessary ???
Maybe it's the joy of tearing apart a power tool pack ( a primordial urge perhaps..? )
Maybe people really love the paper cover on the a123 cell... ??
Note...to those tearing apart dewalt packs ;
the a123 cell is 2.3Ah. cost is $11 each
SO - If $ 11 / 2.3Ah = $ X / 2.7Ah...then the equivalent is $12.91. The price a 2.7Ah cell should cost ! !
Anything less will be cheaper than an A123 cell
Please, Let's hear a really good reason for this from all the brainiacs out there.
Do you idiots actually think a123 gives a rats ass if you buy their cells or not ?
you make me laugh
I also assume u deel are a webmaster and can do better? let's see it
And no i do not expect to sell anything to any users of this forum
Can you imagine discussing a warranty issue with this guy? Calling potential customers idiots, talk about crapping in your own nest....
Doctorbass said:Just to respond about the 40C if it is really necessary, I say YESS !
The reason is because the key is the internal resistor that is a very important caracteristic of cells.
when cells are rated with high C rate number, it is because the very low internal resistor allow to draw more current. In the case where you sont need this high current per cell, the advantage is a must anyway. the reason is that as the internal resistor is low, as the cell will stay warm or cold when drawing juice on it. Cell that have lower C rate number, usally will heat up faster and a more energy will be lost in heat... loosing precious mAh...
Read carefully the battery university chapter and you will find the same explanation.
High C rate number = lower internal resistor = less loose in heat = more energy out from the same charge.
Also, on high peak power demand like 1kW+ the cell will less suffer and dammage if it have a lower internal resistor.
It can become a chain reaction as the cell get used: using lower C cell = higher internal resistor = more heat dissipated by the cell = more dammage to it = loosing mAh = again increasing internal resistor = more more heat = less less mAh = alot more dammage
to the cell... etc
Lesson 1: choose a cell with the lower internal resistor!
lesson 2: usually, these cell have higher C rate number... their cycle life will be better!
you finally get more total kWh energy per $ in the entire life or your cell.
Doc
That's a wonderful dumb idea, Fetcher.fechter said:I had one of those dumb ideas the other day:
Say you use separate chargers for each cell and are only concerned with discharge protection.
You can monitor every cell's voltage to have good protection.
But what if you monitor every two cells (or 3 cells)? If you measure two cells, one might assume that one cell will go flat before the other, and you could determine a good cutoff voltage for the pair that would guarantee that neither cell gets overdischarged before it triggers the cutoff.
The advantage of this approach is it uses half the parts :wink:
In hybrid car batteries (Nimh), they monitor every 6 or 8 cells, not every cell.
This also seems to suggest that an inexpensive charger with minimal regulation and smoothing should be sufficient for A123 cells.efreak said:[...]
Amongst the advantages of A123 cells are their ability to be charged at up to 4C (10A) and their electrical robustness such that they tolerate overvoltage without damage or risk of thermal runaway. This opens the door to using high-power CCCV power supplies to achieve high charge rates at low cost.
The electrical robustness of the M1 cells and their good tolerance for over-voltage means that the 1-2% voltage tolerance on these CCCV supplies is not a problem so long as the packs are not left on the charger once they are done.
[...]
efeak