Exactly!Punx0r said:Quite so.
One possibility not yet explored is that the Leaf owner was rude or antagonistic to the attending officer, who then went out of his way to make a point by charging and arresting him.
Punx0r said:By the law, he stole. He helped himself to something that wasn't his, without seeking permission.
• Mr. Kamooneh had been previously advised by school personnel that he was not allowed on the tennis courts at any time without permission.
• In spite of that notice, Mr. Kamooneh was on the tennis courts that Saturday afternoon taking lessons.
• He was not there watching his son play tennis
• His son IS NOT a student at the school
• He lives in Decatur, not Chamblee
• He was extremely uncooperative and argumentative with the officer that responded to the call
• He accused the officer of damaging his car - the pre-existing damage is on the officer's video when he first drives up
• Had he just said oops, been cooperative and not claimed damage there would never have been a report
• Sgt. Ford's decision to pursue charges was ultimately driven by the previous notice to Mr. Kamooneh
• If Mr. Kamooneh had heeded the previous notice not to be on the tennis courts without permission the incident would not have occurred
• Sgt. Ford was probably feeling defensive when saying a theft is a theft - he was looking at it as he did nothing wrong
We received a 911 call advising that someone was plugged into the power outlet behind the middle school. The responding officer located the vehicle in the rear of the building at the kitchen loading dock up against the wall with a cord run to an outlet. The officer spent some time trying to determine who's vehicle it was. It was unlocked and he eventually began looking through the interior after verifying it did not belong to the school system.
The officer, his marked patrol vehicle and the electric vehicle were all in clear view of the tennis courts. Eventually, a man on the courts told the officer that the man playing tennis with him owned the vehicle. The officer went to the courts and interviewed the vehicle owner. The officer's initial incident report gives a good indication of how difficult and argumentative the individual was to deal with. He made no attempt to apologize or simply say oops and he wouldn't do it again. Instead he continued being argumentative, acknowledged he did not have permission and then accused the officer of having damaged his car door. The officer told him that was not true and that the vehicle and existing damage was already on his vehicles video camera from when he drove up.
Given the uncooperative attitude and accusations of damage to his vehicle, the officer chose to document the incident on an incident report. The report was listed as misdemeanor theft by taking. The officer had no way of knowing how much power had been consumed, how much it cost nor how long it had been charging.
The report made its way to Sgt Ford's desk for follow up investigation. He contacted the middle school and inquired of several administrative personnel whether the individual had permission to use power. He was advised no. Sgt. Ford showed a photo to the school resource officer who recognized Mr. Kamooneh . Sgt Ford was further advised that Mr. Kamooneh had previously been advised he was not allowed on the school tennis courts without permission from the school . This was apparently due to his interfering with the use of the tennis courts previously during school hours.
Based upon the totality of these circumstances and without any expert advice on the amount of electricity that may have been used, Sgt Ford signed a theft warrant. The warrant was turned over to the DeKalb Sheriff's Dept. for service because the individual lived in Decatur, not Chamblee. This is why he was arrested at a later time.
I am sure that Sgt. Ford was feeling defensive when he said a theft is a theft and he would do it again. Ultimately, he did make the decision to pursue the theft charges, but the decision was based on Mr. Kamooneh having been advised that he was not allowed on the property without permission. Had he complied with that notice none of this would have occurred.
Hummmmmmm, that's a real ... Utopian social view you have.liveforphysics said:Thieving from the public is what occurrs to buy the school and pay it's electric bill each month.
The public using public facilities is why they are there. I do not support discrimination of excluding who has the right to use them peacefully.
Radically less harms caused in playing tennis charging an EV than locking people in cages.
I find it very concerning your children's school sometimes has snipers on the roofs around it. Insanity. I would find a place to live with less cops.
dogman said:This is what I call flunking the attitude test.
flathill said:My evil plan is to use my solar powered calculator at night outside the school. Leeching off their night light. Muhahaha
Do it!flathill said:Haha
My evil plan is to use my solar powered calculator at night outside the school. Leeching off their night light. Muhahaha
I don't trust anyone from England. 8 way cameras on every street corner in London. Only an fool would live in a total police state. If it ever gets to that point in the USA I'm fighting or moving if no one cares. It may already be like that in New York city. Haven't been there for a few years.
Hummmm... this wasn't in communist Cuba.scotticeberg said:No, legally this is not theft. The plug was unrestricted in any way, in a place of public accommodation. No signage, nothing. If the school intended its use for authorized personnel only it would be turned off, locked, or otherwise restricted.
This gentlemen will win his case. No judge in his or her right mind is going to issue a ruiling establishing a precedent that allows people to be charged with theft for something like plugging a cell phone in at a park, or plugging in a laptop at the library.
If you believe otherwise you likely have some frocked up authoritarian complex and/or are ignorant regarding legal matters.
I happen to live in Oakland and respectfully suggest you step off.FeralDog said:I hope your not referring to So. Kalifornia. I remember when San Mo College recently had that "incident" that blessedly had plenty of cops to stop it. I see you live in Santa Cruz ... Do you suggest Oakland , CA. as the promised land of blissfully free e-charging and tennis?
FeralDog said:Hummmmmmm, that's a real ... Utopian social view you have.liveforphysics said:Thieving from the public is what occurrs to buy the school and pay it's electric bill each month.
The public using public facilities is why they are there. I do not support discrimination of excluding who has the right to use them peacefully.
Radically less harms caused in playing tennis charging an EV than locking people in cages.
I find it very concerning your children's school sometimes has snipers on the roofs around it. Insanity. I would find a place to live with less cops.
Where is this magic kingdom of peaceful, good-thief tennis players you speak of ?
I hope your not referring to So. Kalifornia. I remember when San Mo College recently had that "incident" that blessedly had plenty of cops to stop it. I see you live in Santa Cruz ... Do you suggest Oakland , CA. as the promised land of blissfully free e-charging and tennis?
I will take part of your advice, I will find a place to live with less thieves (or insane people). We here experience the real definition of "diversity".
Living in one of the top ten most violent places in the USA does wear on the soul, and make one quite defensive. Never a dull moment though. :wink: As a virtue; one does develop a keen eye for trouble.
That unicorn garden perfect place is getting harder and harder to find ... Cause lots of wealthy, arrogant , and entitled folks seem to beat me out for a good spot !
Oh well, any suggestions from the ES board for other "free stuff" we can take from the public.
The kids may like a room furnished with "free" fire hydrants, park benches, and some cool street lights.
Power to the People
flathill said:Haha
I don't trust anyone from England. 8 way cameras on every street corner in London. Only an fool would live in a total police state.