melodious
100 kW
Stupid question but if you don't want to put a whopping 10s battery, could you instead put a smaller voltage battery and still be fine? In my case, it's the ohso popular 6s.
melodious said:Stupid question but if you don't want to put a whopping 10s battery, could you instead put a smaller voltage battery and still be fine? In my case, it's the ohso popular 6s.
makepeace said:Just bought an Alien 8S 120A Twin. Looks awesome and can't wait to get it, but I'd also be a keen tester for an ESC that can do 8S for two NTM 50-60 motors. Sign me up!
Recommendation is for maybe a single and a twin version, as these seem to be the most popular configs. But I'd say if not, a twin - cause you can easily just use one half.
What sort of current rating per motor would you be looking at?
Silenthunter said:when would it be available and how much would it cost?
torqueboards said:According to vedder's specs it is rated for the following:
Current: Up to 240A for a couple of seconds or about 50A continuous depending on the cooling.
Voltage: 8V – 60V.
It's a beast of an ESC -- I truly can't wait..
Alien ESCs are great but it's kind of been what we've been stuck with. Creating your own ESC is a pretty big task as Vedder has spent thousands of hours working on it for over 3 years
makepeace said:It would be really awesome if a bit more acceleration and braking programming freedom is possible. I guess we all want the sort of forced response that ICEs and mechanical brakes give us as it's mostly what we're used to. I quite like the regen. braking capability too, but surely this would still be very limited? What sort of return % of motor current do you think is possible?
Honestly the biggest reason we started this is because there are some significant flaws in the programming with the flier ESCs, but they won't let us see or change the code (not even for $$money$$).
benj said:I suppose that doesn't surprise me...did you try asking Bruno as I think the Alien ESCs are pretty much the Flier ESCs - but with custom firmware that I Bruno has either written, or had someone write.
There's always the reverse engineering angle. The firmware updates for Alien come through the Internet...and you know...everything is hackable![]()
austindavid said:benj said:Screw that. Let's make something great instead.
austindavid said:Screw that. Let's make something great instead.
Screw that. Let's make something great instead.
benj said:Screw that. Let's make something great instead.
)
It would be really awesome if a bit more acceleration and braking programming freedom is possible
Actually you don't need different firmwares for different motors any more, since all more parameters can be configured from a GUI and stored on the ESC. This is the latest addition I made to the firmware and the configuration GUI. I also added auto-detection of the most important parameters by running the motor without load while measuring them. I will probably make a video tutorial soon that demonstrates how to configure the ESC for a new motor. I got it working for every motor I tried so far, everything from tiny inrunners to industrial motors, outrunners in many sizes, bicycle hub motors. With a 700w bicycle hub motor, I can make a "burn out" from a complete stop while sitting on the bicycle without using hall sensors. The latest version of the GUI can also export/import parameters to/from XML files, so we could make a database where different motor configurations can be downloaded for different motors and applications. The motor controller has an USB port, so all you need for changing configuration is a USB-cable and a laptop running some Linux distro.dedicated firmwares for each motor so that operation is optimal in all ways