classicalgas
100 W
- Joined
- May 14, 2016
- Messages
- 205
Here's a more realistic examination of toyota's bias...https://www.motorbiscuit.com/toyota-hybrid-bet-gas-lithium/
A few high points....
"If both the price of gasoline and the lithium that makes EV batteries were to stay the same, Toyota’s predictions for lithium-ion based EVs would probably be correct. That is to say, only 30% of new car buyers would willing or able to drive EVs."
"But its a pretty safe bet that the cost of lithium will eventually go down and the cost of gasoline will eventually go up. There may be temporary drops in gas prices as we open new wells. And their may be temporary jumps in lithium prices as demand for EV batteries increases. But in the long run, the amount of gasoline on earth is finite. There is a ton of lithium spread throughout the earth’s crust, so as we get more efficient at mining it the price will decrease".
"But what about that 90 hybrids part of the 1:6:90 rule? Toyota has been a pioneer of hybrids for years. And that’s fantastic. In its most recent generation of vehicles, Toyota added hybrid technology to many of its full-frame trucks and SUVs. But here’s the rub: When Toyota says that building 90 hybrids does more for the environment than one EV, it is suggesting that commuting in a hybrid Tundra is environmentally friendly. And it’s not."
"This year’s fleet of brand new passenger vehicles pollutes more on average than it did ten years ago. Engines are more efficient and many of them are hybrids. But vehicles now are just that much bigger and heavier. This trend is a major obstacle in reducing emissions"
The big error here is that lithium will continue to be a significant ingredient in emerging EV battery tech, and that energy density won't see significant improvement in the near term. Both those assumptions are out of date.
A few high points....
"If both the price of gasoline and the lithium that makes EV batteries were to stay the same, Toyota’s predictions for lithium-ion based EVs would probably be correct. That is to say, only 30% of new car buyers would willing or able to drive EVs."
"But its a pretty safe bet that the cost of lithium will eventually go down and the cost of gasoline will eventually go up. There may be temporary drops in gas prices as we open new wells. And their may be temporary jumps in lithium prices as demand for EV batteries increases. But in the long run, the amount of gasoline on earth is finite. There is a ton of lithium spread throughout the earth’s crust, so as we get more efficient at mining it the price will decrease".
"But what about that 90 hybrids part of the 1:6:90 rule? Toyota has been a pioneer of hybrids for years. And that’s fantastic. In its most recent generation of vehicles, Toyota added hybrid technology to many of its full-frame trucks and SUVs. But here’s the rub: When Toyota says that building 90 hybrids does more for the environment than one EV, it is suggesting that commuting in a hybrid Tundra is environmentally friendly. And it’s not."
"This year’s fleet of brand new passenger vehicles pollutes more on average than it did ten years ago. Engines are more efficient and many of them are hybrids. But vehicles now are just that much bigger and heavier. This trend is a major obstacle in reducing emissions"
The big error here is that lithium will continue to be a significant ingredient in emerging EV battery tech, and that energy density won't see significant improvement in the near term. Both those assumptions are out of date.
Last edited: