Amazon plans to use drones!!!

I wanna do FPV racing now,

I wanted to get some goggles, But I was thinking of getting a 15 inch monitor instead that's fairly portable.
Do you reckon the goggles are worth it? I
 
A monitor is a common thing to start out with, but most people tend not to stick with it and move on to goggles as they are easy to grab-and-go and offer a much better picture; if you have ever tried to look at your cell phone screen while standing in the sun you will know what I mean.
Goggles can be disorienting at first because unlike a video monitor where you are looking down at a screen, goggles suck you in with the immersion; your body feels weird because almost your entire field of view is occupied by the image you are seeing and you find yourself doing stuff like trying to incorrectly center your balance, generally stumbling around like a drunken idiot, and freaking the heck out when that branch you flew by almost hits you in the “face”.
Another problem I have with goggles is flying airplanes that don’t have landing gear (thus need to be thrown). The way you do this is to give it a hurl with the goggles off and fly by looking directly at your RC. This is a problem for me because I wear glasses; I can see fine up close (no problem seeing through the FPV goggles), but as the rc flies away all I see is a blur. I either have to do a juggling act where I fly with my glasses on at first, then while holding the radio take the glasses off really fast, put them somewhere where they won’t get scratched up and put the goggles on, or have a good enough feel for the rc that I can tell what my blur is doing; I generally go for option 2. This is of course not a problem with multi-copters as they can just vertical take-off from wherever you choose to first set them down.
 
sounds interesting..

What put me off them originally was that they are commonly lower resolution than a lcd screens.
I was thinking of spending the money on better tx rx, antennas and transmit my gopro back to my tv or if I buy a portable LCD..so it's hd

I love the goggles for how portable they are tho, and you fully submerse your self in the experience. How clear is the image when its close to the receiver ?
 
The image kinda sucks, you won't get much improvement looking through a Go-pro over looking through a cheapie CCV camera. Everyone's FPV setups look low-def and grainy to me, so I am not sure low-def goggles matter that much, but if you have Go-pro or a Mobius you will get a hi-def recording that you can look at afterwards when you go home. Antennas matter a lot, the stock whip antennas (rubber duckies they call them) are pretty lame; just toss them in the trash straight away in my opinion. I am happy with just a simple spironet antenna and 200mw transmitter but you can go pretty nuts with your setup; someone on the forums says he flew his wing 85km away from his much more elaborite base-station.

Someone needs to build a video tx that transmits in beautiful flawless HD, but we are not quite there yet unfortunately.
 
yeah I tried a couple of different antennas for my fpv system. the Circular Polarized Antennas are good.. can be diy as well

Made a big difference on my system.
even when i sit inside using my TV as the screen, way less noise in the picture
 
Use a jammer on them, steal the battery, do it a couple of times and then build a free E-bike battery pack :D
When I saw the thread I thought they are going to use drones in Amazon rainforest for exploring, hahaha :oops:
 
Kingfish said:
Yesterday I attended the 2014 Father’s Day weekend Washington Brewers Festival at King County’s Marymoor Park in Redmond, WA not too far from where I live.

140210-gadget-drone-1453_a8d2d5455da6d86789192edb1b120939.nbcnews-fp-440-320.jpg


This is an image of the type of drone that I saw that day. It might be the Walkera Qr X350 PRO (and at Amazon).
Buzzed from above, KF
 
Kingfish said:
Kingfish said:
Yesterday I attended the 2014 Father’s Day weekend Washington Brewers Festival at King County’s Marymoor Park in Redmond, WA not too far from where I live.


This is an image of the type of drone that I saw that day. It might be the Walkera Qr X350 PRO (and at Amazon).
Buzzed from above, KF
Cool! Probably was some one who was in need of an emergency drop of boner pills :oops: . Nothing beats speedy delivery of a drone.
I so see drone delivery as a race now. I see it a lot like Nokia/Symbian phone OS which was owned the market around mid 2005 era before iPhone etc. Nokia was the giant and never saw change coming now they are owned by MS.
If other major logistics companies just sit around and not get into the drone delivery game they could find them selves like Nokia, wondering where their customers went.
 
Google in the drone delivery game!
http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/08/inside-googles-secret-drone-delivery-program/379306/?single_page=true
I am continuely surprised by news commentators who talk about drones bumping into things and that they are dumb, I think people still don't understand that the smart phone revolution has caused an incredible amount of CPU performance to exist in a tiny wattage envelope that is going to eventually make the something close of todays smartest super computer be hovering around eventually.
[youtube]LCmcMtz4j_E[/youtube]

[youtube]4Ix6--xiRi8[/youtube]
 
Airbus Zephyr the solar-powered drone that can stay in the air indefinitely.
Designed to be a competitive cell tower/satellite type equivalent services.

I know the popular topic of all this is shooting them down, I guess amateur rocketeers would be the only ones to shoot these down :mrgreen:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/11225580/See-the-solar-powered-drone-that-can-stay-in-the-air-indefinitely.html
 
It is the nature of nature to shoot down man in his most imperious nature.

http://www.cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video/us/2014/09/03/erin-pkg-moos-angry-ram-takes-down-drone.cnn.html?c=world
 
Interesting fact no one here talked about with Amazon drones that was brought up on this CNBC documentary on Amazon.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/101763562
http://www.cnbc.com/live-tv/cnbc-originals/full-episode/amazon-rising/302722627864

Near the end of the documentary an analyst talks about the fact that Amazon doesn't actually make any money, they do about 88 billion in revenue/sales a year but net profit is around a mere minus or plus 200 million annually.

They said if the cost of delivery could be shaved off it would be able to finally turn that 88 billion in annual revenue into some serious net profits. (Amazon revenue listed on right on wiki page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazon.com )

So it could be that Amazon are going to be very aggressive in getting drone delivery as it could be part of their master plan to actually make money.
 
I've been told that Amazon makes most of its money renting out processing power on the huge computer arrays it has to support the web business.
 
I was thinking about the Amazon drones a few days ago, it got me wondering......it would be totally cool to have drones delivery door-to-door advertisement mailing.

I heard about the profit/loss as well on Amazon. It amazes me that they actually loose money, but their shares go up. Its a rarity!
 
Australia Post plan to use drones for deliveries next year. Kind of exciting to see us having some fancy technology compared to the rest of the world.
Australia Post is trialling the use of drones for package deliveries as early as next year.

The drones, which will cost $10,000 each, will allow packages up to 2kg to be delivered over 25km with the possibility of transporting 10kg on the discussion table.

http://www.businessinsider.com.au/australia-post-could-soon-be-delivering-packages-with-drones-2015-10
http://www.afr.com/technology/australia-post-wants-drones-to-deliver-to-your-door-20151030-gkn0ms
 
Back
Top