toniovelo said:
@ Momotech: find you that Q100H has more torque than old Q100 ??? Thanks.
My Q100 (old) turn with 36v and 6 fet controller at 17A, it's nice setup i think...
find you that Q100H has more torque than old Q100 ?
Yes, I think the "H"versions do feel more powerful. How much is hard to say.
The only direct(bike to bike)comparsion possible would be the 201 standard to the 201 H and I do not have a 201 standard.
But I have done some indirect comparsions, one was;
A friend and I did a side by side drag race;
He has a MXUS 260, 36V Li-Ion battery and a 20 Amp Infineon controller.
I had a 260 H, 10S lipo (38V?) and a ELB 17 Amp controller. I weigh 50 lb.s more.
From a dead stop, the Cute H moved quicker(gears) to a couple spaces in front of the MXUS.
Eventually, the MXUS passes the Cute on it's way to a higher top speed(1 to 2 mph faster).
Slight inclines slowed the Cute down, but did not effect the MXUS.
I think my extra weight caused to results in the last two, but I think it could be said that if everything(Volts, controller and weight)were the same, the two motors would be very close in performance.
Given that the MXUS is a 10% larger motor, I think the performance of the H was impressive.
I do know that my 328 standard in a 24"wheel would not have kept up.
BMS Battery claims that the H "has 30% more torque" and when he compared them, D8veh felt it was more like 10%.
I think the value is in between, probably closer to Dave's impression, say, 15% more powerful.
On the bike I am building now, I have a 201 H in a 24" wheel and the system is 12S Lipo (47V) and a 17 Amp controller and it feels very powerful(for a mini)from a stop. Even little sand on the road will let the tire start spinning. Up to 15 mph, it is noticeably faster than the MXUS on the same battery.
In fact, when the Lipo is on top charge(50V), the 201 H is very sensitive to throttle input and if one is not smooth, it can be quite jerky. None of my other Q100's feel that way.