Joshua Goldberg said:
I know it is frustrating my saying most of these affordable Lifepo4 producers are exporting garbage when I cannot provide details & reports listing the names of the companies and describe the failures themselves.
Wow, that is pretty weak... Earlier in this thread you posted otherwise:
"Have seen the testing reports on all the major Lifepo4 products (8 of 10 failed). Maybe you are on the wrong e-bike Forums not to be seeing it." Please point us to these reports on the 'right' ebike forums.
Obviously you haven't signed an NDA or you wouldn't be able to refer to the results in a public forum like you have. It is hard to see how data that makes your competitors look bad would qualify as IP. We don't need company names, we need the testing strategy and results, 8 of 10 failures would be a pretty convincing reason to be concerned.
I try very hard to be open to new data, but if you and Don can't back up your claims with hard data, as far as I am concerned they are fabrications. As a high-priced competitor with a vested interest in seeing low-priced competitors fail, you, Don, and Lifebutt in general have a HUGE credibility gap when defaming their products. You quote reports you can't share, Don says he can provide reports but when pressed says his lab guys are 'too busy' to actually provide them. If it looks like a fish, smells like a fish, sounds like a fish, and tastes like a fish, it probably is a fish - or in this case simply fishy.
I have been wrong before, I will be wrong again, and I could be wrong now. However, I work on
evidence and not faith. Here is the evidence I have so far and have been basing my opinions on:
1) I have LiFePO4 packs that I have been testing for MORE than 3 months and showing no sign of significant degradation; I do agree that the electronics (BMS/Charger) suck and have seen them damage cells, but nothing I can attribute to the chemistry.
2) You and Don both mention premature failure of cheap LiFePO4, but are unable to backup these claims with any data (playing connect-the-dots with wild interpretations of events is not data).
3) I was unable to find any other mention on the internet of premature failures of LiFEPO4 chemistry - excluding the early t-sky cells that were not LiFe as advertised. If this was a problem, I would expect someone besides Josh and Don would know.
Joshua Goldberg said:
Don Harmon is saying most of what people are buying is crap, I am saying the same thing but we are not saying this to get you to buy from LifeBatt. We are saying it because we are closer to what is going on and we don't like what we see and felt the need to tell people, you'd prefer we shut up and let people waste their money?
On the contrary, We'd like you to SPEAK UP and share the information you claim to have: if it is true, it would help me to know; it would prove Don's case and overcome all objections over cost; it would give ebiker's a REASON not to buy the cheap stuff.
================================================
Joshua Goldberg said:
What I like and liked about LifeBatt from Day One was Don Harmon listens and acts upon what e-bikers ask for
Funny, my experience with Don was very different. When I told Harmon what THIS e-biker needed from a pack, he took a big, wet, nasty, dump all over me. He didn't listen or try to overcome objections like a real entrepenur would, he took my feedback as criticism and got defensive, starting acting snotty and hostile,
so hostile that Fetcher had to delete the content of his post and publicly sanction him.
Instead of a discussion of what I wanted from the hundreds of battery packs I need to buy, Don (and you!) tried to troll it into a discussion of my competency to manufacture ebikes. I have seen a few other examples of this - IMO Don is too busy trying to smack down buyers' objections to actually listen to or overcome them. This is not the behaviour the ebike industry needs to lead it into the mainstream.
-JD