GGoodrum
1 MW
Gregb said:also congrats and assume that is degrees F and not C ???? most of the world has dropped F![]()
We don't give a rat's ass what the rest of the world is doing, we are bound and determined keep our inches, feet, yards, miles, grams, ounces, pounds, tons, teaspoons, tablespoons, cups, quarts, gallons and our Fahrenheit thermometers.


I remember that back in the '70s, there was a big push to go metric, but it didn't stick. There really hasn't been much push to change since then.
As Andy has pointed out, we are done with the cell circuit portion, and have the HVC working with both the relay-based charge controller, and with the new FET-based variant. I've been testing the latter, and it works quite well. I think the balance times will be better because we've switched the on-off logic around, so that when the HVC hits, there's a short delay before the FET cuts power and then when the HVC resets, it is instantly turned back on. The relay version cuts power as soon as the HVC is hit, and then forces a small delay before it turns the relay back on. The net result is that the power stays on a bit longer during each cycle, with the FET version, which lets the low cell(s) catch up a bit quicker. As you can see in Andy's last graph, eventually the low cell will get close enough that the shunts for the other cells can keep the high cells in check on their own, so the HVC stops tripping. The low cell then catches up with the rest fairly quick.
As I've said, I'm testing the new FET-controlled HVC throttling portion of the charge controller. All that is left is to add in the low current detection/auto-shutoff function, and the LED logic. Richard is working on this portion. As soon as he does some more testing in this area, I'll incorporate whatever changes he makes into a new run of boards.
-- Gary