GGoodrum
1 MW
Sorry, I had a phonecall.
I just enabled it. The page is here: http://www.tppacks.com/products.asp?cat=26
-- Gary
-- Gary
ldoolit said:I just ordered one board. Thanks so much for putting this thing together!
I don't see any connectors in the BOM. Am I blind?
My cells are from ThunderSky, they have slightly higher voltage ratings than traditional LiFePO4.
On the LVC side, I plan to substitute a 2.7 Volt TC54VC2702EZB for the 2.1 Volt TC54VC2102EZB.
On the shunt control side, I will rejigger the voltage divider. Right now the set point is 2.5*(180+75)/180=3.54V.
I will change out the 75K for 100K, giving me 2.5*(180+100)/180=3.89V. Does this sound plausible?
- Larry
rkosiorek said:it's less expensive to just use the right stuff to begin with.
12oz cans of the comercial stuff are about $25.00CAD and just spray on. you have a choice of Urethane, Acrylic or Silicone.
i have used the urethane and HT silicone varieties.
http://www.techspray.com/newinfo/2106.pdf
http://www.techspray.com/newinfo/2103.pdf
prepare the boards by washing with Triclo or 99% Isopropyl alcohol. rubing alcohol is not god enough. you can usually get the pure stuff at the pharmacy. it will be behind the counter so you'll have to ask the pharmasist for it. helps if you don't look like you're going to drink it when you ask though.
just spray on at room temperature. it will dry in about 24hrs. or better yet pop it into a 120F to 150F oven for 15 to 20 minutes.
it can be removed with the standard eletrical industry conformal coating solvents.
in Canada you can get them at Electrosonic.com and in the States mouser carries them but will not ship them outside of the continental USA.
rick
ldoolit said:I just ordered one board. Thanks so much for putting this thing together!
I don't see any connectors in the BOM. Am I blind?
My cells are from ThunderSky, they have slightly higher voltage ratings than traditional LiFePO4.
On the LVC side, I plan to substitute a 2.7 Volt TC54VC2702EZB for the 2.1 Volt TC54VC2102EZB.
On the shunt control side, I will rejigger the voltage divider. Right now the set point is 2.5*(180+75)/180=3.54V.
I will change out the 75K for 100K, giving me 2.5*(180+100)/180=3.89V. Does this sound plausible?
- Larry
rf said:Looks like you really need a back-order capability on you web page, Gary.
Then you'd know to order two-thousand boards instead of two hundred.
Richard
My cells are from ThunderSky, they have slightly higher voltage ratings than traditional LiFePO4.
On the LVC side, I plan to substitute a 2.7 Volt TC54VC2702EZB for the 2.1 Volt TC54VC2102EZB.
On the shunt control side, I will rejigger the voltage divider. Right now the set point is 2.5*(180+75)/180=3.54V.
I will change out the 75K for 100K, giving me 2.5*(180+100)/180=3.89V. Does this sound plausible?
I will recompute based on about 2 microamps of input bias current for the FAN431L, and target about 3.9Volts. I tend to engineer in compromises.PJD said:I have been running an earlier version of this BMS for a few months now, and the actual shunt activation voltage for the 75/180 resistor pair is about 3.67 to 3.70 volts. So, your 3.89 volt value will probably be correspondingly higher as well.ldoolit said:My cells are from ThunderSky, they have slightly higher voltage ratings than traditional LiFePO4.
On the LVC side, I plan to substitute a 2.7 Volt TC54VC2702EZB for the 2.1 Volt TC54VC2102EZB.
On the shunt control side, I will rejigger the voltage divider. Right now the set point is 2.5*(180+75)/180=3.54V.
I will change out the 75K for 100K, giving me 2.5*(180+100)/180=3.89V. Does this sound plausible?
At risk of wandering a bit off-topic, the consensus is (or was?) that 3.65-3.70 charging voltage limit is also a good idea for Thundersky cells too.
2.1 Volts sounds terribly low to me, even under load. I have the luxury of not needing to ride in temperatures that low. The bike is garaged before my morning ride, and afternoons around here don't normally go below 45F. I think I'll take my chances at 2.7V. I can always swap them out if it becomes a problem. Using my old SLA pack I learned how much power it takes to stay with traffic: extrapolating to these Thunderskys it works out to between 2C and 3C. More is betterPJD said:As far as the recommended 2.5 volt minimum for Thunderskys. I am a Thundersky user, and I stayed with the 2.1 volt LVC part myself rather than going up to 3.7 volts. I think it is unlikely that their 2.5 volt minimum applies to higher discharge rates (2C to 3C) or at colder temperatures. I suspect the real situation is probably more like SLA battery performance data - the actual "do not go below" voltage is lower at higher discharge rate and lower temperature. I have done several near and below freezing temperature rides so far, and at 26-32F, even a fully-charged pack will sag to about 2.85 volts per cell at a 2.25C rate. This went down to 2.65 volts per cell once discharged about a 50% SOC. So, I would have already encountered cutouts in some situations in uphill traffic if I had used the 2.7 volt part.
Thanks for your input there.PJD said:My cells are from ThunderSky, they have slightly higher voltage ratings than traditional LiFePO4.
On the LVC side, I plan to substitute a 2.7 Volt TC54VC2702EZB for the 2.1 Volt TC54VC2102EZB.
On the shunt control side, I will rejigger the voltage divider. Right now the set point is 2.5*(180+75)/180=3.54V.
I will change out the 75K for 100K, giving me 2.5*(180+100)/180=3.89V. Does this sound plausible?
I have been running an earlier version of this BMS for a few months now, and the actual shunt activation voltage for the 75/180 resistor pair is about 3.67 to 3.70 volts. So, your 3.89 volt value will probably be correspondingly higher as well.
At risk of wandering a bit off-topic, the consensus is (or was?) that 3.65-3.70 charging voltage limit is also a good idea for Thundersky cells too.
i want thiss bms lol im willing to put my packs on the line for it lol how much and where do i get itfechter said:Here's a picture of the ver. 2.1 prototype. In the newest version of the boards, the junk with the red wires on the left has been incorporated into the board. As you can see, the control circuit is combined with the cell circuits for cells 1 to 4.
PJD said:Cell voltages when shunting vary from about 3.665 to 3.70 volts - but the first cells to start shunting may rise as high as 3.72-3.73 volts before settling down to 3.69 volts once the current cuts back.
I have been considering uniform brightness shunt LED's, along with a greenish yellow bi-color LED, as my criteria for "fully charged".
fechter said:PJD said:Cell voltages when shunting vary from about 3.665 to 3.70 volts - but the first cells to start shunting may rise as high as 3.72-3.73 volts before settling down to 3.69 volts once the current cuts back.
I have been considering uniform brightness shunt LED's, along with a greenish yellow bi-color LED, as my criteria for "fully charged".
OK, that sounds very good. I also noticed the cell voltages ran a bit higher during charge, then backed off slightly when the charge finished. I also noticed that the shunt LEDs stay on a little while after disconnecting the charger as part of the surface charge is drained off.
I over-rated the shunt resistors quite a bit to help reduce maximum surface temperature. Ideally they should never exceed 100C on the surface, but they can withstand much more.
The shunt transistors get pretty toasty too, but same thing applies.
Drunkencat,
nobody has ever tried this with Lipo yet, but I don't see any reason why it should not work well, especially with the auto cutoff circuit at end of charge. To make it work, the value of one resistor in each cell circuit would need to be changed to bring up the max charge voltage.
I don't know, what is the ideal voltage for Lipo![]()
drunkencat129 said:i want thiss bms lol im willing to put my packs on the line for it lol