docnjoj
1 GW
This is a bit OT but I tested my Cute 100H yesterday over 20 miles. A few comparison points with the Xiongda.
1. A lot less startup torque on the Cute. Granted I am using a KU63/65 but even so the Cute has 12:1 reduction, the Xiongda 8:1. Xiongda wins hands down off the line.
2. Both are very quiet. Not much more noise than my wife's 9C. Will try with sinewave Cute as Xiongda already has it).
3. Cute seems to need more pedal input at all speeds. This is not a bad thing as we ride for exercise, and pleasure in that order.
I'm gunna keep the Cute on for a few weeks until I can test the rewired Xiongda as the wires were completely frayed and abraided from dragging on the ground. Definitely shorted one Hall and maybe more damage.
Stay tuned.
otherDoc
1. A lot less startup torque on the Cute. Granted I am using a KU63/65 but even so the Cute has 12:1 reduction, the Xiongda 8:1. Xiongda wins hands down off the line.
2. Both are very quiet. Not much more noise than my wife's 9C. Will try with sinewave Cute as Xiongda already has it).
3. Cute seems to need more pedal input at all speeds. This is not a bad thing as we ride for exercise, and pleasure in that order.
I'm gunna keep the Cute on for a few weeks until I can test the rewired Xiongda as the wires were completely frayed and abraided from dragging on the ground. Definitely shorted one Hall and maybe more damage.
Stay tuned.
otherDoc