LightningRods
1 MW
WOW! Those are gorgeous shots! Do you mind if I show these off?
ElectricGod said:I haven't heard a lot of good things about the Nuvincis under lots of torque. It would be cool if there was a heavy duty version of these hubs that can stand toe to to with a Rohlhoff.
LightningRods said:ElectricGod said:I haven't heard a lot of good things about the Nuvincis under lots of torque. It would be cool if there was a heavy duty version of these hubs that can stand toe to to with a Rohlhoff.
Unfortunately the N171 is the heavy duty version of the Nuvinci. It's also obsolete. Cheekybloke has one and is going to try it on his Big Block Beast. I'd like for it to work but I'm not optimistic.
LightningRods said:Spoken like a true single speeder!![]()
spinningmagnets said:The N330 is bad, the N360 and N380 are good, but of course they have limits. The N171 has eight balls inside, instead of the common six, so it can handle 33% more torque than the 360/380.
The N171 has been discontinued because it's heavy, and that is why it was a slow seller. I wish they made a version with 12 smaller balls, because it is the tiny contact surface area that determines the hubs power capability. NuVinci is focused on the global "pedal only" market...ebikes are a drop in the bucket to them.
Has anyone tried a Rohlhoff hub with a big block? My understanding (I might be wrong) is they will shift under load and hold up under significant load quite well.
Recommendation: Experience shows that regular commuter/leisure cyclists will be best suited using a transmission factor of 2.5 -2.8
Offroad cyclists using 29er/650B/Fatbikes tend to opt for a lighter gear ratio. Solo cyclists weighing less than 100kg may do so. This lighter ratio must not fall below 1.9 however!
The higher the chainring/sprocket ratio, the lower the input torque to the gear-unit. It is imperative therefore that the chainring/sprocket factor does not drop below 1.9 (e.g. 34/17=2.0). The smallest permissible sprocket ratios for a rider weighing less than 100kg are: 40:21, 36:19, 34:18, 32:17, 30:16, 28:15, 26:14 and 26:13 = Factor ~ 1,9.
These are the equivalent to a 22:40 combination on a conventional drivetrain. There is no limit whatsoever for higher ratios which means that you can mount bigger chainrings than shown on the table for extreme downhill racing.
If the SPEEDHUB is mounted on a tandem bicycle or if the rider weighs over 100kg, a chainring/sprocket factor of 2.5 (e.g. 42/17=2.5) must be upheld. This equates to sprocket ratios of: 34:13, 35:14, 38:15, 40:16, 42:17, 45:18, 48:19, 52:21.
xnoitulos said:I'm quite curious to see how a Rohloff holds up.
What that says is this hub is not designed to handle torque loads greater than those produced by a human running a 1.9:1 gear ratio. Someone will have to crunch the numbers, but I can only imagine that a BigBlock is going to be beyond this. Rohloff makes a solid product, but I'd be curious how long it holds up to high motor power. Also, at ~$1,400 for a Speedhub not going to be happy if it breaks, especially 'cuz not easy, quick, or cheap to fix.
LightningRods said:xnoitulos said:I'm quite curious to see how a Rohloff holds up.
What that says is this hub is not designed to handle torque loads greater than those produced by a human running a 1.9:1 gear ratio. Someone will have to crunch the numbers, but I can only imagine that a BigBlock is going to be beyond this. Rohloff makes a solid product, but I'd be curious how long it holds up to high motor power. Also, at ~$1,400 for a Speedhub not going to be happy if it breaks, especially 'cuz not easy, quick, or cheap to fix.
Rolloff's performance claims are ridiculously conservative. It's hard to fault them for that. The Rolly does not like to be shifted under power and will protest if you do. If you exceed the power capacity of the hub it has plastic shear pins inside that sacrifice themselves to save the expensive components. I've heard that it's possible to upgrade the plastic pins to aluminum for greater power capacity. Obviously you're reducing your safety margin by doing so.
If you blow the plastic pins I've been told that it's around $60 to get them replaced. It seems that this German product is not like a Mercedes where they get you at time of sale and then again every time the car needs maintenance or repairs.
LightningRods said:I've never heard anyone make a negative comment about the Rolly other than it's price. Someone bitched about having to change the oil occasionally.
Several people have run Rohloffs with Astro 3220s at up to 10kW. Other than needing to back off to shift the Rohloff handled 10k just fine. I agree, needing to back off in order to shift shouldn't even be considered a shortcoming.
Several people have run Rohloffs with Astro 3220s at up to 10kW
Also,Some high performance race bike builders wonder exactly how much power you can put through your Rohloff. Rohloff says the maximum input torque for the hub is 100Nm (Newton Meters). They are saying that the Rohloff could handle roughly 1.5 horse-power, but it is rumoured the hub can handle much more.
I talked to Neal at Cycle Monkey in Berkeley, the USA distributor and service facility for the Rohloff.
So here is a guide for those electric mad men who are thinking of pumping a 5000+ watt rc motor through a Rohloff.
[Y]ou will indeed void your warranty running this kind of power through the Rohloff.
The Rohloff has 6 nylon shear -pins inside the hub which is designed to sacrificially prevent damage to the gears in the case of higher torque loads. This means the worst you are risking is a $100 repair job if you do “fry” your Rohloff. You will know when these nylon shears break loose because the Rohloff will spin uselessly without spinning the tire when the nylon pins break loose.
11th gear is the straight through gear, in this gear you will not slip and it is the safest one to run high power through.
The lower the gear the more likely you are to break the nylon pins loose…so when riding with a lot of power stay up high. Be careful not to apply too much torque when climbing steep hills in low gear.
The other bikes mentioned are also in the 1,000 to 1,500W range.In an email I got from the makers of the m55 in Budapest (so far in testing), the Rohloff is handling the 1500 watts the m55 puts out with no issues.
I guess none of that matters if it's power capacity is grossly underrated and capable of 10kW.The Rohloff SPEEDHUB 500/14 has been developed for racing which means that it can handle the heavy loads encountered during competition. Maximum torque loads in extreme conditions can be as high as 250Nm on the crank (= 150kg on the pedal). This will not damage the gear box because the high chainring/sprocket ratio transforms the low number of crank revolutions into a higher number of revolutions at the cog.
Nice urban skills but I hope you don't live anywhere near me. Riding like that is sure to attract the wrong kind of attention for eBikes. Sorry to be debbie downer...![]()
OK...I want a Rohlhoff!!!
We had more conversations about how low you could gear the hub, Rohloff have calculated that the maximum torque, that the hub will reliably withstand, is slightly more than could be produced by two world class athletes on a tandem using a 38 tooth chainring and a 16 tooth sprocket. This is the lowest gearing that they will sanction (which is equivalent to a 22 tooth chainring and a 32 tooth sprocket in a derailleur system.) I use very low gears and I wanted even lower ones! Whenever I get the opportunity, I like to travel on dirt roads, over high mountains, with medium-weight camping and cooking kit and up to 1 week’s supply of food... I reasoned that, as I was certainly not a world class athlete, not particularly strong or heavy and there is only 1 of me (!) that I should be able to use a lower gear than would be safe for the two world class athletes on their tandem! Carsten agreed with me, but maintained that if I chose this route, it would be at my own risk…no exceptions!
More good stuff in the full article.Rohloff will not give a warranty on the hubs when a gear with an input ratio smaller than 38 x 16 (2.375:1) is used. This (38 x 16) ratio is permissible for use by world class athletes (permissible even for 2 athletes, on tandem)
The diameter the wheel and the gear ratio produced are not relevant…it is the input ratio which is critical…Rohloff state 150 kg pedal force (!!!) with 170 mm cranks as max. input, if exceeded, this could damage the hub as easily in 14th as it could in 1st