LightningRods
1 MW
Föppel said:the Setup in the moment it broke the ratchets was 12T to 92T on the 219, and 40T to 15T on the Bike-chain... i think this extreme (big reduction to highspeed-gear on the rear hub) is what you should avoid, is that right?
Does it make sense that the freewheel on the rear hub and bike-chain gets more "Hate" when Bike-chain is pulling with lower speed and bigger torque, than with higher speed and lower torque (but bigger Sproket on the rearwheel)?
Yes this makes absolute sense. The more motor reduction that you use up to the chainwheel, the more torque available at the chainwheel. 12T to 92T is 7.6:1. Multiplied by the 18T to 90T primary belt reduction is 38:1. Not only is the sprocket turning at 1/38th the speed of the motor, the torque has been multiplied 38 times. 2000 watts has become 76,000 watts! When this very powerful torque meets a high gear ratio, you have a version of the irresistible-force-meets-immovable-object. Less reduction will reduce the torque at the chainwheel, and less overdrive will reduce the resistance.
It seems that the hardest thing possible is a slow pedaling cadence with high power and high speed. This is high reduction and high power meeting high resistance. If an IGH were going to have power handling problems I would expect it to be in the overdrive high speed gears where loads are the highest.
On a derailleur bike if all you are concerned with is the most reliable driveline possible and don't care about pedaling at full power, use less reduction and less overdrive. 16:1 motor reduction and 2:1 overdrive give the same final drive of 8:1 as 32:1 motor reduction and 4:1 overdrive. The strain on the drivetrain would be cut at least in half.