Lithium-ion Polymer Batteries--general info.

They certainly are well positioned now. The RC group is in some awe
as am I
:lol:
Image: 3.7V 40 AH


Kokam's non-flaming cell
March 15, 01:23 AM #25
warhawk80
I can fix it

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: blue springs missouri
Posts: 42

I've gone to kokam batteries myself for the same reasons that Leonard stated but I am not exclusive yet to kokam, I havent phased out all my old batteries yet but when they go I will probably replace them with kokams. I recently disposed of a bunch of packs that where bad from abuse etc. I got to do destructive testing in my back yard. most of the non-kokam packs were scary, with piercing they shot sparks hot enough to melt aluminum and spewed lots of smoke, even packs that would not charge still could have started fires. the kokam cells wouldn't do anything if they had no charge, the ones that would charge still didn't do much. a hole clean through just made the pack warm. a knife stabbed into the pack would just spark a little and puff a little smoke, my cigar smoked more when set in an ashtray. even packs bent over and flattened didn't do anything. shorted across the terminals just got whatever used to short hot until the battery went dead some puffed and got warm but no dangerous results. I tried real hard to get something to happen and couldn't. and these were packs allready abused. I'm not saying that you couldn't cause a fire with the kokams but I think that the chances are better that your wires on your speed control or charger have a greater chance of melting and shorting before the kokams do something bad. (you could still ruin the pack, they haven't made them totally idiot proof yet)

Jason
 
Largest Kokam pack I could find sold commercially in the US:

Kokam 4800 18.5V for $319
http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/WTI0095P?FVSEARCH=kokam&FVPROFIL=++&search3=Go

I wonder just what's so different about these that accounts for the claimed (far) superior cycle life and safety profile.
The kokam websites don't seem to say. The only thing I can think of:
these are a lithium cobalt/manganese hybrid that Reid was hoping his B.S. cells were. If so -- and batteryuniversity states explicitly the chemistries can be mixed within a cell -- then this is the first example I've seen "in the wild".
The weight in comparison to regular li-poly should give it away...I'll go check and report back...
 
Nope, the kokam 4800's look to be about the same weight as other cells of the same size.
http://www.kokam.com/product/product_pdf/rc_070226/SLPB11043140H_4800mAh_Grade.pdf
http://www.fmadirect.com/tech_data/pdfs/CP04800.pdf
http://www.maxamps.com/products.php?cat=59

hmmmm... the thot plickens.

{So this'll be a nice-n-concise sticky, like stickies ought to be, with all the ferocity of a snapping floridian gator, I too shall come back and prune posts like this later. Don't fret Reid, you'll see.}
 
The Wanma company, whose cells make the BatterySpace pack, also claim 'no fire' under similar test conditions. They don't claim such long life though.

speculation:

What's happening, I think, is a shift away from rocket fuel-like compounding.

That is, the electrolytes don't contain the 'oxygenating' chemicals,
-or- the fireable chemicals are otherwise somehow inhibited.
Arcane secrets and my present ignorance are presently in conflict.

These makers must be making it a first priority, however, to remove the fire risk from Lipoly insofar as possible. Because if they can do that,
for large cells, as they have done for miniature cells,
then a,b,c.... they can take the market from the low density dullards.

A123 technology would then look, on the energy density account, dull and retrogressive in the comparison.
 
<p align="justify"><img src="http://endless-sphere.com/forums/files/img_1872_432.jpg" align="right">Unless kokam has altered fundamental li-poly chemistry, I'm dubious at best about their claimed cycle life. The improved safety profile is more reasonable.
Despite some li-poly evangelicals' ardent but unsubstantiated claims to the contrary, canned cells with the same basic chemistry are safer due to the inclusion of vents, PTCs and other physical features. Prismatic lithium polymer manufacturers could certainly employ certain of these features too. A simple venting mechanism would prevent the "puffing" that can damage or short neighboring components and wiring.
The two 18650's I "blew up" didn't actually explode, but rather ruptured and melted. I fear the consequence would have been more serious had I abused a li-poly the same way.

<p align="center"><i>Don't eat batteries for breakfast. Learn from errors else you might become a cereal cell abuser like me! </i></p></p>
 
The two 18650's I "blew up" didn't actually explode, but rather ruptured and melted. I fear the consequence would have been more serious had I abused a li-poly the same way.
As I understand it, the rupture was caused by the PTC's shutting down cells as they heated up... which knocked out cells one by one until just a few were left trying to supply all of the amps... and they ruptured. Lipoly packs lack the PTC's... so they shouldn't have had that problem at all. I feel like I'm nitpicking by pointing this out, but still... what happened with the li-ion cells wouldn't have happened with lipoly cells because there's no PTC.

I agree you have a point - which is that the PTC induced rupture showed that you had a problem, and that without that "warning", you might have had a bigger problem with lipoly's... but I don't know that it would have played out as you are saying if you'd been running lipoly's instead.



I have used lipoly packs from Kokam, Maxamps.com, Apogee, and Thunder Power (both gen1 and gen2, and friends fly gen3). Lithium polymers seem to go through 3 stages of "damage" when you try to pull a lot of amps through them. They heat up, and then they "puff" - basically the silvery pouch expands and the cells balloon up. They still work fine "puffed" - and, they often "deflate" when they cool down so that, if you didn't see what they looked like as they came out of the plane at 140F (60Celsius), you might not have known there was a problem when you see them later at a more ambient 70F (21Celsius).

Beyond temporarily puffing up, there seems to be a point where they start to break down - but still not combust. This can be seen as a sharp drop in voltage (or perhaps a sharp increase in internal resistance... but I suspect voltage). On an RC plane this shows as a noticeable decrease in output power. You'll see a guy pull into a vertical where the plane goes straight up, they crank the throttle to max and he'll climb and then.. you just see the power massively drop off. Once these packs get pulled, they seem puffed but they stay that way after they cool. After that they seem to have about 1/2 to 1/3 of their total capacity remaining and they never seem to give out the amps like they did before. Most people don't even try and just put them aside - or take them to Best Buy's lithium recycling bin.

The third stage I have never personally witnessed. I suppose if the massive drop in power wasn't obvious, and someone kept going, at some point you'd see the pouch burst and possibly ignite. I've seen videos of ignitions while charging, but never while discharging, but I suppose it's possible.

Still, in my experience, even without balancing, and without any safety equipment at all and no monitoring or anything, there's some warning that there's a problem imminent in these things and I have seen people pull 25C out of a 1Ah 11.1V pack (25A out of a 1Ah battery) that was rated 10C/15C (10C continuous, 15C for 10s or less). That lasted about 3 minutes... and then it did the permanent "puff".
 
As I understand it, the rupture was caused by the PTC's shutting down cells as they heated up... which knocked out cells one by one until just a few were left trying to supply all of the amps... and they ruptured. Lipoly packs lack the PTC's... so they shouldn't have had that problem at all. I feel like I'm nitpicking by pointing this out, but still... what happened with the li-ion cells wouldn't have happened with lipoly cells because there's no PTC.

Yes, that seems to be what happened. But if these same cells, under the same conditions that caused the ruptures, didn't have the PTC's, would not the cells have approached thermal runaway anyway? After all, the PTC's began opening for a reason (assuming this scenario is accurate).

I can see where, without PTC's, it'd be less likely that a multi-cell pack like mine would have some cells rupture, while others remain fine. But then too, without PTC's the risk off losing all the cells is greater than losing all the cells with PTC's. It'd be more of a catastrophic, whole pack disaster, or no disaster whatsoever.
 
I like this reply to your question:

"We have tested our Polymer Li-Ion battery pack many time in standard test condition, we have no chance to cause a battery exploded. ( except over charge battery beyond 5V/cell )"

I feel so much safer! :lol:
At least they're being honest it seems....
This is also very suggestive the chemistry is standard lithium cobalt polymer.
 
xyster said:
I like this reply to your question:

"We have tested our Polymer Li-Ion battery pack many time in standard test condition, we have no chance to cause a battery exploded. ( except over charge battery beyond 5V/cell )"

I feel so much safer! :lol:
At least they're being honest it seems....
This is also very suggestive the chemistry is standard lithium cobalt polymer.
I read it the same way: They are being honest with me,
while admitting they have zero experience in life testing the cell or the packs.

I do think their mandated 1A Smartcharger is great good primary safety mechanism: the pack can't go hot on a puny .2C charging rate; a vent-while-charging should be impossible.

Even if the charger were to fail to turn off,
even if the PCM were to fail to regulate cell voltage,
at that rate of charge, it would take many hours
to bung a cell to overheat (I think/hope/don't know).

I'll be using a 12hour tick tock type AC shutoff timer.
If I've run the pack 4AH =, gauged by the Drain Brain's metering,
then I'll recharge the pack, allowing for no more than say five hours,
using the mechanical timer on the charger's AC supply.

Once I learn the habits of the pack, I can then use the timer to
deliberately undercharge the pack; for many or most of my short runs
do not require a fully charged pack---not if I pedal assist, not if I'm going for exercise moreso than for a high speed run.

That is to say, I can charge up to 4.1V,or less, by simple guesstimation of the amp hours to stuff back into the battery, and thereby lengthen calendar life of the pack.


Zimple enouff
(I am German today)

Tank you,

Herr Aflahschindernose
 
Herr Aflahscindernose,
I think it wise to charge slower too. I charge mine at a wicked-fast 0.05C (33 ah pack at 1.5 amps)!
Slower charging, like slower discharging, should provide for longer life, just like charging to something less than the full 4.2v. I recall reading somewhere -- don't know how true it is -- that rechargeable lithium cobalt cells on space-fairing vehicles last 10 years or more by following all these strictures.

http://www.batteryuniversity.com/parttwo-34.htm
parttwo-34.jpg
 
<img src="http://static.rcgroups.com/forums/attachments/4/4/9/7/4/a705206-102-LVC%20example.gif" align="right">
All the straight information:
http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3066606&postcount=8

<p align="justify">Intentional irony, definitely. :D
There's seriously good info in there though.
Wish I had found this chart before hosing $100 of lithium...
3.7V when not under load is it for lithium-cobalt be they canned or polymer. The manufacturers furnish misleading curves comprised of queer numbers.</p>
 
xyster said:
<img src="http://static.rcgroups.com/forums/attachments/4/4/9/7/4/a705206-102-LVC%20example.gif" align="right">
All the straight information:
http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3066606&postcount=8

<p align="justify">Intentional irony, definitely. :D
There's seriously good info in there though.
Wish I had found this chart before hosing $100 of lithium...
3.7V when not under load is it for lithium-cobalt be they canned or polymer.
The manufacturers furnish misleading curves comprised of queer numbers.</p>
http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7119324&postcount=1
User test of a "20C" Maxxamps cell
 
User test of a "20C" Maxxamps cell

So it looks from the graphs the cell failed the 20C test, and at 15C only gave 50% of its rated capacity. So this "20C" cell is really a 10C cell. Is that what you got out of it, Herr Alfalfanose? :D
 
Not sure if this is anything new.
Just wondering if anyone recognizes who the oem might be.
Are the Point-1 lithium-manganese, cuz these strike me as similar?

How the hell did you track down Ben-wA as the BSpace oem?
Teach me how to fish with the 'net & I won't have to ask all the time who the oem is. :oops:



http://www.50cycles.com/info_lith.shtml
Our eZee electric bikes have powerpacks that use Lithium Manganese batteries. We know exactly who supplies our batteries and can state with confidence that the cells in our packs have UL (passed November 29 2004) and CE approval (passed November 7th 2005). Can other electric bike suppliers say the same?



Nominal Voltage 37V

Average Capacity 10Ah

Internal Resistance = 150m O

Discharge Cut-off 30V

Maximum Charge Voltage 42V

Maximum Charge Current 5A

Maximum Discharge Current 20A

Charge Method CC/CV



Dimensions

Height : 135mm

Width : 67mm

Thickness : 228mm

Pack Weight About 3.8KG

Assembled mode 10 cells in series
 
Hi Toor,

The OEM was found through the BatterySpace pages;

Here it is detailed in the second post of this thread
http://endless-sphere.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=505

They're really quite aboveboard--publishing the maker's name and such.
I appreciate that of them.
 
Now there's a switch, I didn't expect the obvious, that they would come clean like that.
Most vendors guard that info jealously for some reason, like they invented the stuf or something.

Well, found the oem that for the above mentioned 50cycles.
Waddayano, this gagooling stuf really works!
It's a long slog thru the muck tho. :cry:
Now the only remaining question, is this the source for Point-1?

http://www.xingheng.com.cn/en/products_7.html
 
Something's wrong with their product info:
The "High Current" cells are spec'd for only 2C while their "high capacity" cells are spec'd for 20C.
 
Yes, it appears they have confused the two terms.

Note the two types are vastly different in packaging.
The high current cells appear to be in hard-shell containers with nutted lugs.

I just ran through this, and appreciate the education.
Have not seen this explained before.

http://www.xingheng.com.cn/en/knowledge.html
  I. What safety issues are posed by lithium ion cells?


1. Short Circuiting: When a lithium ion battery is overcharged (even during normal charging or discharging) with cobalt lithium, the lithium ion will be accumulated in the cathode and form dendrite to penetrate the membrane. Interior short circuit will take place.

2. Form heavy current: The exterior and interior short circuit will cause over-heavy current with hundreds amps.

i. When exterior short circuit, because the exterior load is too low, the cell will discharge with heavy current for a moment. A great of power will be consumed in internal resistance and release lots of heat.

ii. The main reason of interior short circuit is the membrane is penetrated. The heavy current is caused in the interior. The temperature ascends making melt down the membrane. The area of short circuit enlarges, which causes other problems.
3. Where the gas releases from: The lithium ion cell must adopt the organic electrolytic solution which the decomposition voltage is over 2V in order to reach the operating high-voltage of single electric core with a voltage between 3 ~ 4.2V(operating voltage of nickel-hydrogen cell and nickel-chromium cell is 1.2V, operating cell of plumbic acid is 2V). However the organic electrolytic solution will be electrolyzed under the condition of heavy current and high temperature. When electrolyzing, the gas will arise, which causes the interior pressure to climb caused the pressure is too strong even the shell will be broken through.
4. How does the burning take place: The heating comes from....(snip)
 
Reid

I am so sorry you are having problems with this pack, I would return it to them and get a refund, I dont think they have sorted these packs yet, I dont see why you should be the beta tester for a product that doesnt do what it is supposed to do.

At this rate you would be better with one of dougs lipos or ebike.ca nickel packs, as these work and do what they say and are proven. I know you want to pack the batteries in the original box, you may have to look at going in the frame with a bag and ditching the box to get good batteries that are going to work.

I think you have been far to patient, I would just send them back, their recent price hikes would make me seriously consider using them.

Good luck

Knoxie
 
Hi all. I'm new to this forum (see my first post here...) but I have quite a bit of LiPo/a123 experience in the electric RC world, mostly with big electric helicopters. I am a frequent contributor at RC Groups (over 5,000 posts...), and have probably as much experience with LiPos as anyone over there. I helped Charlie Wang get Thunder Power going several years ago by starting a website (http://www.tppacks.com) to mainly sell his Thunder Power "gen 1" packs. Back then, we didn't have to worry about balancing. Charlie did a great job of painstakingly matching cells in voltage and capacity. The cells stayed perfectly balanced, for literally hundreds of cycles.

The only problem was that the cells were only good for about 5-6C discharge rates, so most packs were built using four 2000 mAh cells in parallel, and either 2, 3 or 4 cells in series. Being an early proponent of using higher voltage setups in helicopters, mainly as a way to get higher torque, I finally convince Charlie to make some 5s3p packs.

With the 8-10C "gen 2" cells, everything changed. Charlie still did the cell-matching trick, but these cells (from a different Korean manufacturer...) just did not stay balanced. People ended up killing a lot of these packs, mainly due to over discharging. Eventually, almost every pack had problems, and at best, the pack lifes were dramatically shorter. To his credit, Charlie replaced a good number of these packs, no questions asked. It cost him over a million dollars that year. Other pack manufacturers, like Brian at Tanic Packs, started putting "taps" on packs that would provide access to each individual cell junction. With the 15C "gen 3" Thunder Power packs, a new balancing connector was added. Thunder Power also introduced the TP-1010C charger, and matching 10-cell TP-210V balancer. While other charging/balancing solutions appeared as well, The 1010C/210V combo was unique in that a serial connection between to two units allowed the charger access to each cell block in order to indivdually monitor the voltage. That way if one block had a problem, the charging process could be stopped, before a cell exploded, causing a chain reaction. This was significan, as 90% of the problems with LiPo fires/explosions are a result of overcharging cells.

Today, there are lots of very good cells on the market that have higher capacities, and very high "C" ratings (20-30C continuous, 30-40C "burst"...), but they are all still dangerous as all get out. When the a123-based DeWalt packs came out, many of us fully embraced the use of these cells, as they seemed to be the answer we were all looking for, high power, and high safety factor. In actuality, it took many of us awhile to understand a few key characteristics/differences in working with these, as opposed to LiPos, but once we did, they have worked quite well. Other than the higher weight issue, the main "problem" we had was that although these cells have very high "C" ratings (30C continuous and 50C+ burst...), the voltage drop under load is a lot greater than what you would see with a higher end LiPo cell. This is a big problem in helicopters as a voltage drop translates into a drop in speed in the rotor, which is not a good thing.

What we also found, however is that over the duration of the pack, that voltage drop stays pretty constant. With LiPos, even the best LiPos, the voltage drop gets worse towards the end of the capacity. The a123 cells, however, deliver pretty consistant power under load, throughout the duration of the pack. By simply regearing a bit, to plan for the higher voltage drop, we were able to get very consistant power, all the way to the end.

A second characteristic that has proven quite useful is that in a helicopter it is virtually impossible to kill the cells. With LiPos, we have all gotten used to only discharging a pack down to where it stillhas about 15-20% capacity left, in order to increase the cell/pack life. In a helicopter, with the a123s, we can fly the packs until they completey dump, which happens quite quickly with a well-balanced pack, because the "resting" voltage of the cells at the point that a helicopter won't hover anymore, is still well above the point of damageing the cells. The packs/cells seem to be able to handle this "abuse" quite well, for hundreds of cycles, so we just "fly them like they were stolen", to quote one of our more colorful users. :D If you have a rainy weekend, with nothing to do, check out this thread: http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=566256, which chronicles our experience with a123-based solutions in helicopters over the last year. It is up to about 100 pages now, I think.

In any case, I have become totally immersed in using a123 cells in my quest to convert as many "glow"-powered users over from the darkside. :) For years I have had several different conversion kits for converting the most popular gas-powered model, the 8-pound Raptor (there are about 100,000 of these out there...), into a higher-powered electric equivalent. Although moderately successful, I constantly ran into two concerns from potential converts that were "showstoppers". One is the cost of LiPos (most said it was like carrying around a year's worth of fuel on every flight...), and the second was the danger factor. Once we got the right setups figured out, the a123-based solution has allayed these concerns for many. Now, the Taiwanese Raptor manufacturer has finally introdeced an electric version of the Raptor, but unfortunately, it is not very "a123-friendly", so I sell a lower frame upgrade that makes it easy to use packs, pretty much just like they come out of the DeWalt packs.

As many of you here are aware, the cheapest way to get a123 cells is to buy the DeWalt packs off eBay, from dealers who break apart multi-tool combo setups and sell the individual pieces. It is pretty easy to get these for about $100, shipped, or about $10 a cell. I tried very hard to get a123Systems to sell me cells directly, at a reasonable price, but the best I could do was about $13 a cell, and that was in quantities of about 10,000. Last year they sold Black and Decker (who ownd DeWalt...) 10 million cells for the tool packs. Even though 10,000 sounds like a lot, it really doesn't do much to get their attention. Now, of course, GM is dumping tons of money into a123Systems, for the Volt, so they don't even respond anymore.

When these first came out, charging and/or balancing these were a bit of a problem, as the optimum cutoff voltage for a123 cells is 3.65V, not the 4.2V that LiPos use. What we found, however is that it didn't seem to charge them at the higher voltage. They don't blow up, like a LiPo most certainly will if overcharged, but nonetheless, we usually just picked the closest LiPo setting the chargers had, and balanced the packs separately. Now, virtually all the popular charger/balancer combos have a123-specific modes.In the last few months, I've noticed that if packs are made from fairly matched cells (i.e. -- from the same DeWalt pack, or from packs with similar "resting" voltages...), they will do a fair bit of self-balancing. The key is to fully charge the pack. Even with packs that have different resting voltages, right after a charge, once under even the slightest load for a few seconds, the individual cell voltages will end up pretty close to each other, usually somewhere between 3.48 and 3.53V per cell. The point is that now I don't really worry too much about cell balancing, and have stopped adding balancer plugs to my a123 packs.

What I have found in using a123-based setups EVs is that it is quite possible to kill cells by over discharging them, so some sort of BMS is really needed, if nothing more than a low voltage cutout (LVC) circuit. I know the Crystalyte controllers have this feature, but I think it might be set too low (29V for the 48V controller?). I need to read up about the controller hacks you all are doing to these, to see if this can be adjusted. I'm still trying to figure out how low you can safely take an a123-M1 cell before it a) dies completely, or b) at least has its capacity reduced, but I think a resting voltage under about 2.5V per cell is about right. Under load, I don't know yet. I inadvertantly left one half of a 16s4p pack not connected and then went on a ride that was longer than the other half of the pack could handle. About half the cells were okay, and came back to life from resting voltages around 2.6V, but many had voltages around 1.6-1.8V, and didn't really recover. A few were dead-shorts, or completely dead. The ones that were above 2.6V seem to be fine, and seem to still have capacities around 2200-2300, I've noticed their "resting" voltages right after a charge are a bit lower than the normal 3.5-3.6V, down around 3.4V. I'm keeping my ey on these, but so far, they still seem to working fine.

I've never really understood just exactly what the BMS does in the DeWalt packs. It has connections to each cell junction, but I don't know if that is just to monitor the cell "health", or if actual cell balancing goes on when ithe pack is connected to one of the DeWalt chargers. I do know that the BMS does have a current limiting function, which is somewhere around 15-16A, I think. This precludes the use of this BMS in our helicopter applications as we can easily hit short 80-100A peaks (4000W+...) in some of the more powerful setups. The packs have two negative outputs, one that is switched (enabled by connecting the positive terminal to the closest pin next to it, but apparently it does not have a LVC function, at least not if the unswitched negative connection is used. I was able to kill several cells in a pack in the initial testing I did with using these packs in series (i.e -- 66V...). This happened because two of the four packs I was using came disconnected from the harness I used when the bike hit a prety good pothole. After that, I had my friend Andrey (http://www.askmanap.com make some mounts for me that solidly hold the packs in place. Each mount is designed to slide into a Topeck MTX channel. I'm using two of these mounts now to hold 8 of these packs :

eBike-DeWalt-01.jpg



The nice thing about this setup is that using four of the fairly inexpensive DeWalt chargers, I can be fully recharged, and ready-to-go again, in under two hours. With my other a123-based setups, I use a $400 Zivan NG1 48V charger for charging all the 16s packs, and a 6V 2A Soneil charger for my 2s "booster" packs I use to get to 18s for my Mariner folding bike setup. The NG1 will charge at a max of about 18A. I usually just charge all the 16s sub-packs, from each setup, together, but if I have time, I'll individually recharge the sub-packs. For the two 16s2p packs on the Port Runner, I can charge each 16s block individually, if needed. Each cell in these 16s "chunks" were pretty closely matched, initially, so the occasional individual 16s1p charging helps keep these pretty well balanced.

a123-16s2p.jpg



In the 18s setup I have in the bag, on the Mariner, there are two 6s6p blocks and a 4s6p block. Each of these have special connectors that can be connected to a BalancePro HD charger http://www.fmadirect.com/detail.htm?item=2044&section=38 that can individually charge/balance up to 6 cells at up to a 10A rate. Occasionally, I will use three of these chargersto recharge/balance the big 6p subpacks. To get to 18s, I then use two 2s3p subpacks in parallel, for 2s6p. I have two of the 6V 2A Soneil units, but if I'm in a hurry, I'll use a couple of my RC chargers, which all work at 10A.

Sorry for the long, rambling post. :) I'll try and keep them shorter, in the future.

-- Gary
 
Back
Top