Pediglide said:It's 10.5 pounds.
garrettgajewski said:Has anyone heard of these new motor wheel trucks? The motor is built right into the wheel. It seems like a very cool and interesting innovation, but I don't think it is as customizable as the good old pully ones (doesn't go as fast, etc). The only positive thing I can think of is it saves space and is just a neat idea.
garrettgajewski said:... (doesn't go as fast, etc)...
torqueboards said:Now who would ever want a production board when there are a ton of DIY options![]()
garrettgajewski said:Has anyone figured out a way to incorporate onboard charging to their Diy build?
torqueboards said:garrettgajewski said:Has anyone figured out a way to incorporate onboard charging to their Diy build?
You can but IMO I think it butchers the performance. With RC packs you can get pretty much unlimited amp draw 100amp for a 5ah 20C pack. More if you increase C rating and/or capacity.
If you add on a BMS usually amp draw is normally 80amps or less.
I think this is very similar to reason why quadcopters and RC counterparts don't bother with on-board charging.
In the beginning, I was against it but I've gotten use to it and prefer the performance over another production based board with limited specs.
SlowNinja said:Is there any reason you couldn't use the BMS only for charging/balancing and use the ESC for current limiting and low voltage cut off? You would get the easy charging of the BMS without the performance hit.
highfiving said:Fun on the beach
highfiving said:Glad you like the boards. I find removing the rear binding allows better placement of my footing and easier to dismount. Also, at higher speeds the wobble seems very much related to where my rear foot is and the binding wasn't the optimal spot. The front binding is really all I need to assist my turning. Great site, great to share with people who undetstand