deepfraught
100 W
Norko vs. Norco.
deepfraught said:Norko vs. Norco.
deepfraught said:Cool, be interesting to see your offroad action before the flats.
I searched but couldn't find anything about gears or gearing?
deepfraught said:Gearing, you know, for that funny old pedalling thing you do =D
deepfraught said:aha, yeah that's 48km/h sprocket right? =D
Are you single speed/tensioner or spin-on cassette and derailleur?
I figure if my A2B Metro can be 48 front 7 speed and pedal with effort for 35kph on the flat, skinnier larger diameter tyres and similar weight package should be just as commutable on the Norco. (now I'm thinking swap it over from A2B, but I recall some unique thing about that freewheel/cassette that stumped people).
deepfraught said:Cool, where did you get that from, any make/model/terminology they go by? Any 8 speed derailleur be fine?
A year ago I didn't have much luck finding an 11/12T cluster in spin-ons.
shorza said:Your bike looks great and stealthy.
Can you please show how you have attached the pelican case?
just head to clark rubber. after all... its more than foam and rubber! :lol:shorza said:Great stuff, thanks.
I reckon i'll need to get some of that foam also.
pendragon8000 said:Yeah looks good man. hows the handling with weight up on bars/forks? is this mainly a comuter for now?
But yeah it really does look more stealth.
oatnet said:Birth of the front-mounted pack as a handling improvement
http://endless-sphere.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=5891&p=93326#p92978For these purposes the main consideration would be the moment of inertia about the 3 axes, and of those, the roll axis is the most significant.
The relation between the mass distribution and the roll axis is what determines the moment of inertia. Hence all the discussion about where the roll axis is.
http://endless-sphere.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=5891&start=435#p109855the overall general rule still applies that if you concentrate the weight along an axis from the middle of the rear wheel to the top of the front wheel you are okay.
Toorbough ULL-Zeveigh said:ahem, yes well his redbike having been born a year prior in 2009;oatnet said:Birth of the front-mounted pack as a handling improvement
the good capn' James T. Beefheart could rightly claim that ES first.
oatnet said:Toorbough ULL-Zeveigh said:ahem, yes well his redbike having been born a year prior in 2009;oatnet said:Birth of the front-mounted pack as a handling improvement
the good capn' James T. Beefheart could rightly claim that ES first.
Hey, thanks for pointing that out, I totally missed that thread and so far it has been a good read. Yep, per his website, he built that frame 5 days before the July 27th 2009 Presteigne race, 6+ months before my first front-pack ride in January 2010, 7+ months before I resolved the last of the issues with a hard mount and felt confident enough of my findings to publish. I admire that he preceded Gensem by mounted batteries to the front frame instead of the stanchions, something I have thought a lot about but have not endeavoured to achieve. To be fair, neither of us was the first to front-mount a load on a bicycle, delivery bikes have done that for a century, and people on E:S have had batteries sloshing around in front baskets before.
However, I claim to be the first to identify front-mount as a handling improvement and share that with the E:S community. Tiberius dicusses general theory in the 2008 links you included, and demonstrates a level of insight/knowledge that far exceeds mine, but I don't see a build thread for his red bike, or any specific recommendations to use front-packs to improve handling on hubbies. I think I am the first to document it as a preferred solution for street bikes, and I spent 2 years specifically evangalizing the front pack as a handling improvement, taking a lot of flack from skeptics, investing a lot of time educating nay-sayers, before people really started to catch on to the benefits and run with it.
Wow, this picture is exactly what I have been visualizing, but to describe my theory of the problem with heavy rear-rack mounted packs over a rear hubbie. I see that grean bar as a potential axis of rotation that runs between the heavy mass of a hub motor and the control input at the handlebars. When you lean into a turn, the rear-rack batt transitions from being over the wheel track, to being way inside the track. Gravity pulls on the rear battery, generating forces that make the bike want to rotate around the hub-handlebar axis. On a loose surface, those forces can be enough to lift the front wheel.
After a fall during a mild turn, when I was trying to figure out and describe what happened, I came up with this theory. I had ridden the same course many times on a Tidalforce IO cruiser with a front-hub battery and never had a problem. One day I removed the front hub battery and replaced it with a big pack on a rear rack. It felt fine for most of the course, until I fell on the first turn with a loose surface. I was off the throttle like I always do for that turn, but as I leaned lightly into it, the front wheel lifted. An image of the fall is burned into my brain, watching in amazement as the front wheel rose above the plane of the frame as I rotated around the hub-handlebar axis. The rear wheel stayed planted, the hub-handlebar axis stayed pretty much in place, but I went straight down on my side and the front wheel went straight up in the air.
It really shook me up. I spent a long time trying to explain the fall, thinking about the sensation I had of rotating around the hub-handlebar axis, wondering why the front wheel stayed planted when I used a hub battery, but lifted when I went to a rear battery. I started asking other people about their falls, and noticed a trend of people with rear-mounted packs falling on turns with loose surfaces. To test the theory I bunjied a pack I was building to the handlebars, and I could tell the front wheel was now planted much better on turns. By the time I had hard-mounted the pack to eliminate slop, I had also noticed that the steering was more refined, precise/solid feeling, than a rear or mid-mount pack. I also noticed I was making smaller inputs through turns, I had to dial my reactions way back, and the more weight I took off the back the more precise the steering feel. That is when I decided I should start warning people about rear-rack packs, and educating hubbie street riders on the handling benefits of a front pack.
Anyhow, snow I apologize for taking your thread on a tangent, and I'm still digging the stealth of your build :
pendragon8000 said:Yeah looks good man. hows the handling with weight up on bars/forks? is this mainly a comuter for now?
But yeah it really does look more stealth.
You finished exams or what?
oatnet said:Hi snow, your build is looking great, nice job with the Pelican. Did you use a velcro mount instead of the hard-mount clamps so you could easily remove it?
-JD