marvin78
10 kW
If you move the question about pollutants dissipating I think you can do whatever you fancy ( I think you should preserve the cause and effect of messages at least
). Other then that, yeah it's hard to separate the issues, but I'm fine with only discussing solutions here other then fighting the root cause ( but I will reserve the right to point it out when brought into question, I mean it should work both ways ).
So we're back to: building exteriors which can handle higher wind speeds for all buildings inside hurricane prone regions ( also on stilts to prevent flooding, and put the stilts on concrete foundations so they can't be washed away easily.. and keep scaling up that foundation size to deal with more storm erosion.. yeah getting expensive fast when implemented on every structure ).
Sounds like you're calling the right wing AGW skeptics in for debate with posts like the above.
Okay, let's not talk solutions. Let's have another flame war about co2.
I can just move things to the AGW debate thread if you want. let me know what topic you prefer discussing.
So we're back to: building exteriors which can handle higher wind speeds for all buildings inside hurricane prone regions ( also on stilts to prevent flooding, and put the stilts on concrete foundations so they can't be washed away easily.. and keep scaling up that foundation size to deal with more storm erosion.. yeah getting expensive fast when implemented on every structure ).