ridethelightning
1 MW
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2013
- Messages
- 2,010
Green Machine said:the vapor guys dont know their batteries at all.
That chart looks like it was made based on what the 18650 makers claim as their amp rating.
I have been spending a lot of time tryng to convince the vape community that rebranded cells such as efest and mxjo are junk....
currenlty the mxjo is the most popular batteries in the vape world. Mostly becuse mxjo will claim ridiculous numbers like 30-35 amps.
The mxjo has been proven to be a grade b LG HE4 rewrapped.
The fake sony Vtc5s that plaque the vape world are mostly rerapped samsung 25rs
Sorry but i beg to differ.
I would not have bothered to post the table if it was just based on the manufacturers specs.
if you read the couple pages of blog before the tables in the link, the guy actually tests the cells himself. the different colours in the table relate to the temps reached at a given CDR
he is, i believe, foremost a battery enthusiast before a vape enthusiast![]()
he also discusses re-wrapped cells, and why NOT to trust the manufaturers specs.
I think the vapers are doing us a great service, because they are often using single cells and stressing the crap out of them, every day, untill they give out.
this gives us great insight about what different cells are really capable of, particularly the high discharge ones they also like.
they are going tp know what the compared expected cycle life of different cells is when hammered, way before someone with a large ebike pack will
Green Machine said:That wave is changing right now....and the most popular battery is becoming the LG HG2. I like to see that wave because atleast the HG2 is a name brand battery with some respect behind it (LG)
Nobuo said:Indeed each samsung INR18650 25R is capable of ~35A amps continuously, but in this case the voltage drops ~0.9V respect 1A discharge.
spinningmagnets said:This is useful info because...a typical E-biker will accelerate from a stop, drawing max amps. And then...during the cruise phase, the motor/controller/and battery pack can cool down when using a lower continuous amp-draw.
When a vape-enthusiast has adjusted a vaporizer to use high amps, they use high amps on every draw. (they call it low resistance vaping, due to the low resistance of the heater wire that is used for that).
If they have verified the Samsung 30Q as a 15A continuous cell, a tiny 5P pack provides 75A continuous (100A peak?)
ridethelightning said:found this cool testing list from our friends the vapers :lol:
https://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/blogs/mooch.256958/
CamLight said:I feel very strongly that temperature is a very important part of any cell testing and it's been very frustrating to see so many cell testers/reviewers not taking temp into account. How can anyone determine if a cell is ok to use if you don't know how hot it gets? And what about cycle life? It might not vent at 100°C but it sure as heck won't last very long running at that temp!
OK, rant over.![]()
Punx0r said:The Sony VTC5 seems to just edge out the Samsung 25R, but it's literally twice the price and fakes abound. A friend reported the 30Q didn't perform as well as the 25R in his sub-ohm (0.3 or 0.4 ohm from memory) vape.
It's about time someone produced a milli-ohm mod powered by A-spec nanotech![]()
ridethelightning said:btw. from your experiences, how do the 25r and 30Q compare when it comes to 20A discharge. do the 30Q get much hotter?
these are the 2 cells i am most interested at the moment.
particularly weather the 30Q are actually going to hold up well cycle life wise if you ask for 20A peak from time to time.
will the 25R maintain their capacity better than the 30Q over time if used in this way??
docnjoj said:Hey Camlight. I'm not a smoker but I do respect your engineering background. Thanks for this info.
otherDoc
bellfador said:Many thanks CamLight for battery test work and sharing data.
Yes, temperature is the key for the hidden questions. Recently I made a few tests on panasonic/sanyo 18650GA and ration between DC internal resistance, current and temp (Kelvin losses). First I put battery in termally isolated environment, heating with 1W (1 J/s) and calculate 55 J/*C thermal capacity. This mean when losses is 1W battery temp will rise each second with 0.0181 *C. After that I discharge battery with 5A expecting 1W loss (40 mOhm DC internal resistance). But battery heat up 0.025 *C/s or 40 J/*C. I repeated several times all tests and differences were max 5%. Accuracy for my measurement devices is 1%. Efficiency of chemistry changes added more losses and DC internal resistance not determined correct current heating. Have more tests to do...
Defense video for effest 35A 2800mAh (maybe LG HG2): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYM80n88Zew
From this test I calculate average 48-55 J/*C but chemistry, environment and current are different.
Punx0r said:The Sony VTC5 seems to just edge out the Samsung 25R, but it's literally twice the price and fakes abound. A friend reported the 30Q didn't perform as well as the 25R in his sub-ohm (0.3 or 0.4 ohm from memory) vape.
It's about time someone produced a milli-ohm mod powered by A-spec nanotech![]()
LiPo is not save. If LiPo is in 18650 shell capacity will be near 1Ah... close to LG HB6.
Internal resistance is in close ratio with specific capacity ( mAh/sm^2). Hire is my idealized chart for the best 18650 cells:
![]()
Whilst i can see the apparent relationship is clear, and it is useful for clasifying current cells,.. isnt what you have shown the difference between the various cell chemistry's. ?bellfador said:Internal resistance is in close ratio with specific capacity ( mAh/sm^2). Hire is my idealized chart for the best 18650 cells:
Hillhater said:Whilst i can see the apparent relationship is clear, and it is useful for clasifying current cells,.. isnt what you have shown the difference between the various cell chemistry's. ?bellfador said:Internal resistance is in close ratio with specific capacity ( mAh/sm^2). Hire is my idealized chart for the best 18650 cells:
Technically IR is not a function of "capacity" , just the current status of "power density" for various chemistries/ cell construction.
CamLight said:Interesting! I would love to see the Aspire ICR "40A" 1800mAh cell added to your Ri vs C graph. It's an astounding performer. Unfortunately it's an ICR cell. :-(
Was that your Efest testing video? Your temperatures are lower than the ones I measured. Measuring near the end of the cell, and not the middle, and through the wrapper means that the temperature of the cell is higher than your measurements. That wrapper is a very effective thermal insulator and that thermal resistance causes a temperature drop across it. The middle of the cell is always hotter than the ends too.
Really glad to see that you used a thermocouple though! So many cell testers use the CBA's temp sensor. But that uses a thermistor, making it essentially useless for measuring anything with more than very slow changing temps. And even more useless for anything with a concave surface...like a battery. There is almost zero thermal coupling between the thermistor bead and the cell. And they cover it in heat shrink too!
bellfador said:CamLight said:Sorry for bad English. I not create this video, only watched.
My measurement method is better.
On grafhic Aspire ICR "40A" 1800mAh cell is between VTC4 and HB6.
My chart is idealistic presentation of technological limits in Li-based battery.