cwah
100 MW
Could you do test with:
20A discharge to 3v
1A charge to 4.05v
Should be truer to what happens in real life!
20A discharge to 3v
1A charge to 4.05v
Should be truer to what happens in real life!
cwah said:Could you do test with:
20A discharge to 3v
1A charge to 4.05v
Should be truer to what happens in real life!
"11.2% loss over 500 cycles, or 22.7% loss vs rated:" "22.7% loss" is not accurate.eTrike said:... or 22.7% loss vs rated:
Wheazel said:Surprised over the durability of thee cells. The number of cycles tested will probably never be reached in my applications.
Reassuring to know they hold up so well. I instantly wonder what other cells with more cycle life as a design criteria would show under similar "shallow cycle" test conditions.
eTrike said:@zener Interesting thought. If charging to 4.2 instead of 4.15 cycle life would suffer a bit, but would be marginally the same loss as was graphed with the previous 1C test which yielded 2200mAh at the start.
liveforphysics said:As the 25r was designed around being a cordless power tool battery in which cycle life is of minimal importance in the cell design (as opposed to EV cells which sacrifice C-rate and some capacity in exchange for high cycle life), I'm actually amazed they cycle so well.
madin88 said:Wheazel said:Surprised over the durability of thee cells. The number of cycles tested will probably never be reached in my applications.
Reassuring to know they hold up so well. I instantly wonder what other cells with more cycle life as a design criteria would show under similar "shallow cycle" test conditions.
don't forget that this was only 1C charge and 1C discharge, so far byond the specs and normally not how the 25R will be used in real life applications..
i really would like to see same test with a samsung 35E or panasonic 3500mAh GA for comparison.
madin88 said:Wheazel said:Surprised over the durability of thee cells. The number of cycles tested will probably never be reached in my applications.
Reassuring to know they hold up so well. I instantly wonder what other cells with more cycle life as a design criteria would show under similar "shallow cycle" test conditions.
don't forget that this was only 1C charge and 1C discharge, so far byond the specs and normally not how the 25R will be used in real life applications..
i really would like to see same test with a samsung 35E or panasonic 3500mAh GA for comparison.
Teh Stork said:liveforphysics said:As the 25r was designed around being a cordless power tool battery in which cycle life is of minimal importance in the cell design (as opposed to EV cells which sacrifice C-rate and some capacity in exchange for high cycle life), I'm actually amazed they cycle so well.
What common cells would you rate as "EV cells"?
Common Samsungs: 22P, 22F, 26F, 29E, 30B, 32E
Common Panasonics: PF 2,9Ah, BF 3,35 Ah
Common LG: E1, HE2, HE4
or others off the top of your head?
Curious![]()
DrkAngel said:Starting a chart including the new test cycles.
![]()
I fear you underestimate several members ...cwah said:It would be closest to real life as nobody would discharge at peak power until empty either