ZapPat
10 kW
Mr. Mik said:I am just wondering why they ask for so much money for the add-ons??
GREED.
Same as for the 40$ software bug fix I guess...

Mr. Mik said:I am just wondering why they ask for so much money for the add-ons??
Doctorbass said:Guys, i would really love to build my own CBA amplifier! 8) .. but some here have more knowledge than me in electronic for using analog transistors and gain and all that calculation stuff... these electronic classes are far from me...
BUt i have 2 great heavy transistor rack!!! for a total of 5000W of dissipation!! it's two larhe heatsing with 10x MJ15024 and the other with 10x MJ15025 with all their shunt resistors!!
But i only gave a general idea on how to build a currant amplifier.. first.. it seems very simple to me.. but i'm sure there is always something i forget about the desing..
Can some of you help me with that desing!
i'll post some great pics of them
Doctorbass said:Andy, can you take maximum pics of the CBA amplifier board and connector please?
Thanks for taking those pictures! I've been dying to know how it was laid out for a long time.AndyH said:I take requests if you want a better look at something. :wink:
I'm a little late to the thread but I just joined the forums.Doctorbass said:another thing is that at 30 to 35A the CBA 40A fuse melt!! and it fall into temp error at 101W and only 0.8Ah done!
This is impossible to measure the famous 40A max with a 3.3V LiFePO4 cell. It begin at 39.9A.. then it osciate and pulsate the current between 15 and 40A at 5 sec interval... that's not explained anywhere i the manual...
I upgraded it last night and to allow it to operate at 35A continuous, i needed to reenforce the pcb trace of the mosfet and the fuse to lower the resistance and heat and also to dissipate heat...
now, i have no more prob at 35A 3.0V
Doc
CamLight said:Thanks for taking those pictures! I've been dying to know how it was laid out for a long time.AndyH said:I take requests if you want a better look at something. :wink:
Could you confirm that the op-amps. e.g, U1, are TLC272C's and what the MOSFET's are? I couldn't quite make it out in the photos.
The CBA uses the TLC272C so that was expected but it appears that the MOSFET's are from ST Micro and not IR's IRL2910 (as used in the CBA).
AndyH said:The MOSFETs are P120NF, and at least one of the op-amps is a TLC272CP. I'll have to get the rest of the info when the amp returns -- it's on its way 'home' to have Q3 replaced and to be recalibrated. I stepped on a powerstrip during a battery test and 'cycled power' on the amp. POP POP and out comes the magic smoke.
Be careful though...steveo said:FYI for everyone...
A 4110 mosfet will work as a good replacement mosfet for CBA 2!!!
-steve
Thats very interesting indeed, Camlight!CamLight said:Be careful though...
The IRFB4110 has great thermal resistance specs (a Rjs of about 0.9 degrees-C/W vs. the IRL2910's 1.25 degrees-C/W) but the Maximum Safe Operating (SOA) graph from the data sheet is worrisome (http://www.irf.com/product-info/datasheets/data/irfb4110pbf.pdf, FIgure 8 on page 4).
Check out the DC plot line. It shows that when using the IRFB4110 as a load (i.e., operating in its "linear region") as is done in the CBA, you must derate it down to about 6.5A at a pack voltage of 10V (65W). At 15V, you're down to 1.5A (22.5W). And at about 17V, you can't exceed 1A (17W).
Check out Fig. 3 on page 5 of the datasheet. You can see that when the MOSFET is biased with a gate voltage below approx. 5.2V that any increase in temperature will result in the MOSFET trying to pull more current. And since MOSFETs are rarely biased at a voltage that high when used as a load, the MOSFET will always try to conduct more current as it heats up.ZapPat said:Thats very interesting indeed, Camlight!
I've hardly ever used FETs in their linear region, and didn't really think about this much. Indeed it would explain the many FETs destroyed by west mountain CBA users. Do you know what mecanism in the FET limits it's use in it's linear region to such a great extent? It sounds kinda odd to me, who always uses FETs in switching circuits.
If this is true, this companie's CBA has a major design flaw!
I thought they were using the FET in a buck converter setup at first, but then didn't see any inductors nor anything that would be used as a load inside. No doubt Docbass's good old transistor bank would be much better than those FETs for this application! He could use them as a stand alone simple current-regulated load with a few extra parts I think. I seem to recall some such circuits in my electronics encyclopedias...
CamLight said:Be careful though...steveo said:FYI for everyone...
A 4110 mosfet will work as a good replacement mosfet for CBA 2!!!
-steve
The IRFB4110 has great thermal resistance specs (a Rjs of about 0.9 degrees-C/W vs. the IRL2910's 1.25 degrees-C/W) but the Maximum Safe Operating (SOA) graph from the data sheet is worrisome (http://www.irf.com/product-info/datasheets/data/irfb4110pbf.pdf, FIgure 8 on page 4).
Check out the DC plot line. It shows that when using the IRFB4110 as a load (i.e., operating in its "linear region") as is done in the CBA, you must derate it down to about 6.5A at a pack voltage of 10V (65W). At 15V, you're down to 1.5A (22.5W). And at about 17V, you can't exceed 1A (17W).
The IRFB4110 is a true switching MOSFET, that's why it's so great for speed controllers. But it hates operating as a load and must be severely derated if it does.
Exceeding these derated specs risk the chance of hotspotting inside the MOSFET die and thermal runaway, which will fry the MOSFET. It might fry in a minute, or it might take a year, but it will happen.
Steve, as a test could you take your CBA up to 100W with a decently high voltage pack? At least 24V, 48V would be great. The thermal resistance specs for the IRFB4110 will allow it to run cooler than the IRL2910 but the higher voltage will test the MOSFET's susceptibility to hotspotting.
Since the IRL2910 in a stock CBA doesn't even have a DC plot line in its SOA graph and we don't know how far it might need to be derated when used as a load, IMHO, this is one of the possible causes for CBA MOSFETs burning out when used at power levels significantly under the rated continuous max of 100W.
steveo said:FYI for everyone...
A 4110 mosfet will work as a good replacement mosfet for CBA 2!!!
-steve
That 24V test sounds good. The wattage will still be within the CBA's ratings but it will test the 4110's ability to be used as a load.steveo said:CamLight said:steveo said:Hey
thanks for your feedback!, I used a 4110 as per it is the best of mosfets i've ever seen; and i have a bunch of sprares kicking around; my second choice would of been a PNF75NF mosfet... but i wanted better! ..
I will try 12v tonight at say 8amp Which is 96W; That is pushing it IMO;
I will series 2 12v packs for total of 24v @ 4 amps which is 96W
I have 1 or 2 30 & 35 amp fuses left at my house lol .. i will need to buy some more .. I think i will stop by canadian tire tonight to pick up a bunch!!!
What is the wattage limit of the cba 2 for single cell? 100w to 150W is was there paper says?..i prefer to stay on the 100w end .. as doc showed in an earlier post .. the pcb need to have thicker wire added for more current capability, lower resistance & temp!
-steveo
CamLight said:steveo
Thanks for sacrificing a MOSFET for the cause!
According to my calculations that IRFB4110 probably wasn't running above its absolute maximum operating temperature. IMHO, it blew because it hates being operated as a load.![]()
An 86W test with a 12V pack? IMO, it would still blow, and fast too.![]()
The IRFB4110 is only rated for about 48W at 12V. An 86W discharge is still way beyond its rated maximum.
The STP75NF75 also isn't rated for use as a load but its SOA graph looks a bit better than the IRFB4110...it might work.
If you want, PM me your address and I'll send you an IPP048N06L MOSFET to try. It's rated for use as a load at up to 100W at 40V. Several people I know are already using this MOSFET successfully at 125W....including me.