Although it's not necessarily the bicycle community's fault (I'm not pissed at anyone, just in general at the situation), I noticed a trend I find frustrating.
I was browsing Google searching for advice on affordable fixies and each time I landed in a forum thread where the OP was looking for feedback on a low to moderately priced fixie they we're purportably interested in, it would inevitably be shot down and the only legitimate choice offered would be the Kilo TT or Kilo TT Pro. The Sole had a "low quality frame". The Wyatt wasn't well known enough and had "low quality" parts. Even Mission Bicycles was not good enough for the price based on what you were supposedly getting. So now we have thousand dollar bikes that are not good enough. Do you see what this means? Not only are the sellers failing the consumer in price, but even if you had the money, they are failing in quality as well at that price. That means even higher prices for an actual purchasable bike in the future.
Now it can possibly be argued that the naysayers had a point in each case. But I want to know how did it get to the point in the bicycle community where there are so few legitimate choices now? Buying a bicycle was supposed to be a freeing experience but I feel it's becoming similar to buying a car where, based on your budget, you are forced into a more and more constrained choice of selections.
You're telling me there is only one legitimate choice for a moderately priced fixie? The Kilo TT and that's it?
Has the bicycle market really failed the bicycle consumer so utterly???
Thanks for listening. Rant over but I'd really like someone to tell me it's not so. I don't want to see the bicycle market go the way of the car market.
I was browsing Google searching for advice on affordable fixies and each time I landed in a forum thread where the OP was looking for feedback on a low to moderately priced fixie they we're purportably interested in, it would inevitably be shot down and the only legitimate choice offered would be the Kilo TT or Kilo TT Pro. The Sole had a "low quality frame". The Wyatt wasn't well known enough and had "low quality" parts. Even Mission Bicycles was not good enough for the price based on what you were supposedly getting. So now we have thousand dollar bikes that are not good enough. Do you see what this means? Not only are the sellers failing the consumer in price, but even if you had the money, they are failing in quality as well at that price. That means even higher prices for an actual purchasable bike in the future.
Now it can possibly be argued that the naysayers had a point in each case. But I want to know how did it get to the point in the bicycle community where there are so few legitimate choices now? Buying a bicycle was supposed to be a freeing experience but I feel it's becoming similar to buying a car where, based on your budget, you are forced into a more and more constrained choice of selections.
You're telling me there is only one legitimate choice for a moderately priced fixie? The Kilo TT and that's it?
Has the bicycle market really failed the bicycle consumer so utterly???
Thanks for listening. Rant over but I'd really like someone to tell me it's not so. I don't want to see the bicycle market go the way of the car market.