Stop Geoengineering Chemtrails

Well, nutspecial, I guess I owe you an apology. That last batch of youtube videos has convinced me of your righteousness, and that fine scientific diatribe so eloquently disseminated by sansander has removed any other doubts I may have had. This opens a whole new world for me and I thank you.

Now that we are buds, I wonder what is your thinking on perpetual motion machines and the efforts by government and the petroleum industry to keep them suppressed.
 
I was getting ready to reply to thud's very appropriate post and see yours jim.
How kind, and surprising.

In answer, I'd probably start with independant research into anchient history- for anything from the past that main stream appears to gloss over or obviously speculate on, there will be likely more to consider. Research up through coral castle and Tesla, the world wars, histories of secret societies, and end on the most modern sciences such as quantum theory and psy.

For balance, also consider a study into capitalism, communism, socialism, fascism, and the major religions.

edit///
How can you expect more of an answer than that? Am I the controlling interest of oil conglomerate(s), or do I have an 'overunity' device? No. Common sense would tell me that if in existence, all significant enough technology and power would be hidden from the world, and likely not by gulf, shell, exxon, or any one government.
So, I don't mean to dissuade others from looking into what interests them, but a proposal to broaden the scope.

The docus that made me first aware of geoengineering, and the possible evil chemtrail.
[youtube]jf0khstYDLA[/youtube]

[youtube]mEfJO0-cTis[/youtube]

And thud, that metabunk on dane wittington was pretty lacking man. Titled '10 bullet points', chooses speculations to disagree with, goes through 3 and quits, to be continued 2012.
 
below yours in black
nutspecial said:
IMO what people need here is a dose of reality.
Got ANY? I'll take two if you find it.
_________________________________________
1) Current governments are known to do large scale potentially harmful things even to their own civilians without knowledge or consent.
Can't deny war....& those vaccines that wiped out polio sure fooled us....Why isn't there ONE conspiracy theory about some thing wholesome tha worked?
Plenty of stuff to study on vaccines. Past to present.

2) Often these things take 50 years (or more?) for 'documented proof'.
There is little (or no) repercussion, which doesn't give the gov much incentive not to continue secret acts does it?
sorry, air travel is a for profit industry...you would do well to study the young Howard Hughes
I wasn't referring to the air industry. 'these things' pertained to #1.
Try this: http://www.rense.com/general36/history.htm , submitted earlier in thread.
I also found deeper looks at cia/jfk, cia/media contribution, gulf of tonkin , pearl harbor, and bay of pigs were very interesting as well. Amazing how much actually gets declassified 50 years later.


3) Geoengineering is a real proposition, often talked about by gov as 'aerosols from planes', and is considered quite possible technically (nano PM) and financially. (see below)
Another video...surprise, they put nuts on these shows to get a ratings bump off whatever chicken little is currently spouting...the "Scientist" is actually an author of a book for public consumption/fear mongering.
Nuts? Lol, we agree. Does that discount the fact this is valid terminology and is studied by nasa, jet propulsion labs, and various over scientists, and are also acknowledged within govs and un?

This is actually good journalism imo. The interviewer seems to know what questions to ask.
Meh, just one in a dozen for tv personalities trying to make a buck. At least he's on a network that has reputation to protect, that keeps mud slinging & sensationalism in check. regarding the content of their "interview" Again, your kidding me right? this guy clearly reveals his agenda @2:49 in the video....its all about the bucks.
Disagree- he is practically the public figure head for geoengineering thud.
https://www.google.com/#q=david+keith+geoengineering
No offense to the man personally, but doesn't he remind you of Nye/ DeGrasse's ugly cousin? :D

PS thanks thud I'm checking out the info on dane.
your welcome
I detailed @ end of above post to this. I found it more than a little lacking.
To be fair, I have watched both docus from http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org in above post, and have listened to several public presentations (including to local government) by him


Just curious, were you able to easily debunk or discount the multiple videos of on/off conrails?
you say "contrails" do you mean Chemtrails? the folks posting the alarmist garbage have no clue about how the dynamic environment that is the earths atmosphere works & how incredibly diverse it can be.
No, I mean contrails. Although it appears obvious to some there are also 'persistent contrails'. Which could indicate nucleation of water droplets around heavy metal and oxide nano particulates. The rest is large generalization and opinion. How does that stack to the same idea about the gov, specifically that it's by no means always right, knows best, or remains transparent?

below your's in blue
Really, the simple fact that contrails exist, are created by airplanes in a dynamic, fluid environment & eventually dissipate in varying patterns, subject to the changing (often rapidly) atmospheric conditions...or on a rare calm day can hang for hours is absolutely acceptable to me. Given we have examples of it originating with the 1st planes capable of the speeds & altitude to reach the required conditions.
They have been there far longer than the sudden appearance of the "chemtrail conspiracy" or global warming.

Have you ever flown? (in a airplane?) & noticed how bumpy it can get near mountains? or over the great plains, or near cities?
the atmosphere isn't a blanket of fixed density or temperature or relative humidity......there is wind blowing in different directions at different altitudes over the same airspace. bubbles of warm humid air rising through the soup....soaring aficionado's rely on them.
Fair enough, although I would recommend comparing the first jet engines to modern day ones. Night and day man.
Not in a single example of any of your linked info did anyone show the math as to what % of sunlight needs to be blocked for any measured amount of time...or calculate the effectiveness of any "chemtrail" as it is/was deployed or observed thru any scientific method.
Geoengineering is a valid thing, and there's plently of media and gov approved stats to consider if you're interested. The interview with the public head of this wasn't enough for you, so what about directly from nasa?

Here is a youtube channel that would be a better use of your time:
https://www.youtube.com/user/destinws2/videos
act my age.....indeed. Fair enough, well done. Thanks for the link, I lke smarter everday. Pretty much teethed on that genre.

_______________________________
Side note-
Wow, about 20 replies and not-a-one addressed the simple questions at top of page 8 that would require just an ounce of independant research, yet they are so simple and the answers are all mainstream. Yes I'm talking about nasa and climatologists. I feel some are so quick to dismiss and/or condemn.

PS, if people think david keith is insignificant, perhaps a firm base understanding is missing. My apologies for assuming people actually had a base knowledge of this. Maybe from the horse's mouth would be helpful- Nasa JPL

[youtube]EsKfD0-sFzA[/youtube]

I have the bullet points too, but you guys would immediately dismiss, because it's commented on by someone like you or me.
 
r3volved said:
I answered all four of your questions, you're just shifting the goalposts.
Which is how we can tell the difference between a true believer and a troll.

A true believer would attack those questions head on believing that they could win their point and make us all see the truth by their answers. Their answers might be wrong, but would follow their own logic unwaveringly. True believing conspiracy theorists all share a couple common traits. Distrust in the establishment, and an unwavering Messianic belief in a "truth." As such, it's their duty and moral responsibility to make you see the truth.

A troll will see the questions as a trap and an end to their fun, so they will change the subject, create a straw-man question to answer, or create a rebuttal in the form of a question directed at you with such an outlandish premise that you become distracted from your original point while addressing their points.
 
Nah, we don't need labels. We act out in frustration, and plenty of times we don't realize we missed something, are being deficient, or are crossing a line.

Especially on fringe subjects, it's unrealistic to expect people to be as objectively interested in some things as yourself.

This is a good point on high objectivity. Questioning can be like a pandora box, and the theorist would highly welcome refinement and often prefer being wrong to being right, so proper discussion can be a win-win
 
Double-Facepalm-Gif-04.jpg
 
The fingers said:

Too bad on their way across the Pacific they aren't seeding the clouds to give us some needed rain. :(

Hope that changes soon for yall, Vegas broke a '79 record two weeks ago in rain..lookin to have more next week as well.
 
So I guess some of you guys must have more than 4 digits in the last 4 digits of your phone number.

But just looking at that, 2479 must be realities phone number.
 
Just imagine this.. the biggest geo-engineering effort is millions of cars shooting cocktails of hazardous chemicals into the atmosphere. And then millions of homes using massive amounts of energy from fossil fuel sources which emit more chemicals from centralized sources.

China is stuck in doing this. Coal plants emit dimming gasses. Stop emitting coal and the layer of chemical fog stops blocking out the sun. Now you have increased radiation from the sun and hotter temperatures where people live. Now your water supplies have a higher evaporation rate, but some billion people need water to drink, so..

We consume water that has cocktails of tons of different chemicals. It would take a muti billion dollar facility per city to filter out everything and return the water to true purity...

Wanna be free from pollution? live in the lowest population density area or undeveloped area you can find.
No amount of political protest or bumper stickers or petitions will stop things in the industrialized world.

Pinch every penny.. and build up a huge reserve of cash and drop out.
 
Where i live, it is so polluted that when it rains, your car gets dirtier because the water catches the particulates as it comes down from the sky. The pollution that gets trapped in ice that melts off the ground gets into the water supply.

So yeah, the air, the water, and the soil is all contaminated with petroleum byproducts, manufacturing byproducts, medical waste contaminants, heavy metals from the mining operations in the valley, etc.

We have an autism rate that is much higher than the average, and one has to wonder..

Now go on, tell the USA's #1 or #2 economy to take a pay cut for the sake of their own health and join up with the environmentalists.. and find out that most people just don't care. Health is only a concern when you have developed a problem; not something to be proactive about :lol:

You just have to get away from people with that mentality. These are the same people running governments, operating the plants, buying the toxic products, idling their car in an inversion, etc. You can't just point your finger at the producers of the pollution or the government alone; companies have no incentive to create pollution without consumers of their products, eh?
 
But I don't want to drop out. I want to be on the job. if I sell my house and buy one close to the job, supposedly I get to keep my property tax even though prices have risen. If I could afford houses close to this job I'm imagining I'll find. I suppose I'll go on freelancing, even if I work more than I have been I'll still be going all over and can't move closer to EVERYWHERE. What was the most I ever drove in one year? Don't want to remember. . . .

So healthy is used for many things, such as a healthy career, healthy home life. Pay cuts don't tend to help with all that. So the teary eyed Hollywood actress already told you what you're supposed to believe about the autism rate, totally ignoring the fact that we also have the highest women over 35 successfully having kids rate.

How nice if I could pick up and move to the middle of nowhere and the cheap real estate and use what I sold my house for on this low budget filmmaking career. But there'd be nobody there to help me. You find those people in the LA or NYC area.

Still waiting to see what the years of intense abuse of their environment is doing to the Chinese health. We should hear that story ramping up real soon. Will their government allow that to mean anything?
 
Dauntless said:
So healthy is used for many things, such as a healthy career, healthy home life. Pay cuts don't tend to help with all that.
Yep. Healthy means rich. So the #1 most important thing is to make as much money as you can, even if it ruins your health. Because it's healthier.

Sounds like they have you right where they want you.
 
billvon said:
Sounds like they have you right where they want you.

They want you to be the one responding to my posts. You make me look like a God swatting the insects. Meanwhile, if they wanted me here, they'd give me a steady job.

Circa-1920-Truck-Jump-760x417.jpg
 
Thats one of the more self grandiose statements I've ever seen written... once one starts comparing ones self to a god swatting flies, a professional mental health check is usually in order.
 
Back
Top