ge·o·en·gi·neer·ing
ˌjēōenjəˈniriNG/
noun
the deliberate large-scale manipulation of an environmental process that affects the earth's climate, in an attempt to counteract the effects of global warming.
r3volved said:Your uneducated opinion is irrelevant.
The easiest test you can take?
Is geoengineering a valid term?
Has it been proposed?
Gee, what would it look like?
All you do is speculate under the guise of discussion. Right in this quote you are equating 'natural' with 'side effect'. It's all word salad in an attempt to disseminate doubt around facts because you don't understand them. If I'm wrong, please explain why a natural effect equates to a side effect...if I'm right, continue your word salad to tip toe around answering.nutspecial said:I'm certainly not wasting my time speculating on fine detail in reply to u guys, you all still think 20 and 30% increased global dimming is just natural, a natural side effect to more jet traffic, meanwhile you shrug off that geoengineering is of any validity or concern :lol:
The easiest test you can take?
http://www.quibblo.com/quiz/1zX74-F/The-Easiest-Test-Ever-Number-1
Is geoengineering a valid term?
yes
Has it been proposed?
yes - here's the definition again since you missed it.
ge·o·en·gi·neer·ing
ˌjēōenjəˈniriNG/
noun
the deliberate large-scale manipulation of an environmental process that affects the earth's climate, in an attempt to counteract the effects of global warming.
Gee, what would it look like?
it wouldn't look like any one thing in particular...it depends on desired affect. You don't know what it actually means so you've spun your own conspiracy definition which doesn't even linguistically fit.
Geo = world/earth/geographic
Engineering = the branch of science and technology concerned with the design, building, and use of engines, machines, and structures
Here, here! Brentis.Brentis said:Thank god most of your spew is in Toxic so the googling masses can't see it.
I use to read every thread, every post. ES was my greatest entertainment and eduction. I'm losing that feeling.
It brings me no pleasure saying these things, in fact I've written this msg several times and deleted because I didn't want to come across as mean spirited, but am so tired of it.
All the best.
If you had the least understanding of science you would see that this pretty much proves that they are no more than condensed water vapor.
Gregory said:I wonder where the "chemicals" are made, who transports it, who stores it, who manages the inventory, who pays for it, who loads it onboard, and who maintains the equipment.
Gregory said:The rabbit hole gets deeper.....What about Ship Tracks?
Roy Rogers said:Happy trolls, to you,
until---we post---again. . . .
nutspecial said:I'm not sure where the line was crossed for me in this thread, but it was a ways back.
Guys, this isn't even my thread, but yes it's my opinion that geoengineering is already going on, likely on purpose, and most people have a huge mental block to even try to understand the topic from a vantage opposite their own.
-Thud, cmon man, act your age sorry to offend, but the continual puke fest of youtube links as evidence is offensive
4 simple questions at top guys, are they that hard?i missed the Q's somewhere in the minusia....boo thud.
Extra credit:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4WhYKP83zo
yer kidding me......Dane wigington?
https://www.metabunk.org/debunked-dane-wigingtons-10-bullet-points-regarding-geoengineering.t615/
^^^^^try this one on^^^^^^^^^
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwjuSBXjelUrcan you put the pilots chat in context? They are talking about coding something.......nothing referencing the plane in front of them
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ftFb-d1xkyg&index=4&list=PLwfFtDFZDpwulG0PJ9IID0iypsRXDSa1E
another dane w. Manipulation to support his theroys...which he uses on stupid people to raise funds for his non-profit research.....sounds harmless.(ever look at what controllers of non profits pay themselves?) Btw. By stupid, i mean the ones who swallow bunk from snake oil salesmen with out further research, other than from sources provided by the original misinformer.
remaining links deleted to save space
nutspecial said:-Thud, cmon man, act your age
Thud said:Now we need a real problem to discuss...maybe something ellectricly powered, or that maybe produces some ellectricity, that you can measured with an ohm meter from harbor freight.
nutspecial said:Has anyone just gone out and played with an IR thermo when the moon is out?
Gregory said:2015 is the hottest year on record (beating 2014 the previous record).
If this is geoengineering it isn't working very well....Typical gubbermint, always wasting taxpayers money.
sansander, if this really bothers you, move to Perth, we don't get contrails here.
nutspecial said:IMO what people need here is a dose of reality.Got ANY? I'll take two if you find it.
_________________________________________
1) Current governments are known to do large scale potentially harmful things even to their own civilians without knowledge or consent. Can't deny war....& those vaccines that wiped out polio sure fooled us....Why isn't there ONE conspiracy theory about some thing wholesome tha worked?
2) Often these things take 50 years (or more?) for 'documented proof'.
There is little (or no) repercussion, which doesn't give the gov much incentive not to continue secret acts does it?sorry, air travel is a for profit industry...you would do well to study the young Howard Hughes
3) Geoengineering is a real proposition, often talked about by gov as 'aerosols from planes', and is considered quite possible technically (nano PM) and financially. (see below)Another video...surprise, they put nuts on these shows to get a ratings bump off whatever chicken little is currently spouting...the "Scientist" is actually an author of a book for public consumption/fear mongering.
This is actually good journalism imo. The interviewer seems to know what questions to ask. Meh, just one in a dozen for tv personalities trying to make a buck. At least he's on a network that has reputation to protect, that keeps mud slinging & sensationalism in check. regarding the content of their "interview" Again, your kidding me right? this guy clearly reveals his agenda @2:49 in the video....its all about the bucks.
-video removed-
PS thanks thud I'm checking out the info on dane. your welcome
Just curious, were you able to easily debunk or discount the multiple videos of on/off conrails?you say "contrails" do you mean Chemtrails? the folks posting the alarmist garbage have no clue about how the dynamic environment that is the earths atmosphere works & how incredibly diverse it can be.