First, that is a zone and a zone is not a city.London did that 10+ yrs ago. Their “emissions free zone”,, .effectively excluding all but EVs and public transport from the CBD.
…Hows that worked out for them ??
so what is the prediction?The results are predictable.
That is a myth. American cities were systematically destroyed first so they could be rebuilt for the use of cars rather than people. If they could do that metamorphosis then, we can do it again to fix the damage now.Too bad America is designed the opposite way due to the fact that we got the car early in our timeline.
If you do not fix the problem, the problem does not get fixed.so what is the prediction?
For sure it is a shame that people could not build or maintain or supply cities before cars came along.There are cars you need in the city - trucks for transporting stuff, maintenance cars, taxis etc, so i doubt you could remove all of it.
That is a myth. American cities were systematically destroyed first so they could be rebuilt for the use of cars rather than people. If they could do that metamorphosis then, we can do it again to fix the damage now.

Interesting. The value I placed on the truck plummeted 100% the moment I saw one.New video from Doug Demuro:
Values down 50% over a few years.
Tesla finding itself having to sell a good % of them to it's own companies![]()
Good for you but you are definitely in the minority as most just take the insurance company's offer and go looking for a replacement.That's how i got my car for ~50% off. Some one hit the rear end, producing minor, but ugly damage. Auto body place quoted insurance 10k, but that looked wrong to me. Insurance paid me 9k, i hired a little guy locally to fix it for 3k, and he did a great job actually.
Good for you but you are definitely in the minority as most just take the insurance company's offer and go looking for a replacement.
Not to comment on what you are saying in your post, but to riff off the words.The one thing hardest to replace is aircraft.
This is precisely what the Netherlands did starting in the 60s. It was extremely car-centric back then. A radical course correction was applied and executed, resulting in the result we have today. It's definitely possible technically, the main roadblock isn't viability, it's politics.Yea you just need to systematically destroy everything again and rebuild it with a population many multiples the size versus then.
Should be pretty easy.
This is precisely what the Netherlands did starting in the 60s. It was extremely car-centric back then. A radical course correction was applied and executed, resulting in the result we have today. It's definitely possible technically, the main roadblock isn't viability, it's politics.

They say talk is cheap, but not here.$12.2 billion to extend BART 6 miles into San Jose. Won't finish until 2036.
Not entirely true. In my area bicycling was booming in the late 1800s- early 1900s. Over 12% of the population rode bikes. The area's first improved roads were created for bicyclists at the insistence of the bicycle clubs at the time.In the USA, cars heavily influenced all our infrastructure; before that we were built for horses + buggies. bicycles never really took here.


Not entirely true. In my area bicycling was booming in the late 1800s- early 1900s. Over 12% of the population rode bikes. The area's first improved roads were created for bicyclists at the insistence of the bicycle clubs at the time.