John in CR
100 TW
I for one am putting my chips on Matts real world results. He has one. He uses it on his bike. Plus he has great follow through and evaluation, not to mention the generosity to share the details from start to finish. If his motor doesn't get hot, that's all the efficiency data I need. Add on top of that less than 16wh/mile at average 20mph, and you know with that kind of power available Matt's not puttering around like some 80's Egeek trying to save a penny getting to work. I'll be happy as a clam if I get to just 80% of what Matt pulled off in style, and I've got my 1kwh+ of lifepo4's just itching for exercise, so I should have more range than I'll ever use.
All the worry about efficiency and range, yet the greatest gains in this regard aren't weight and drivetrain efficiency. Make you and your bike more aerodynamic, yet that's all but ignored except my those few who have done everything else. If efficiency is so important to you, address wind resistance first, and don't just blindly accept upright design and wind resistance as something you can do nothing about.
John
All the worry about efficiency and range, yet the greatest gains in this regard aren't weight and drivetrain efficiency. Make you and your bike more aerodynamic, yet that's all but ignored except my those few who have done everything else. If efficiency is so important to you, address wind resistance first, and don't just blindly accept upright design and wind resistance as something you can do nothing about.
John