Worst foods declared by the World Health Org. pg 37

Yo, 'D', on the serious ... do you notice that even those of us that disagree mightily with your POV ... none of us have ever called you stupid? What's with all the ad hominem aggression dude? It's just politics. I refuse to get down in the mud with you, and I've pointed out that I am not really interested in what you think of MY POV. Are there not meds you can take to blunt your instincts towards insulting strangers?
 
Looking like Trump's plan is to act like he is running for the 2024 election for the fund raising. Don't think he really intend on winning but want's the media attention for promote his new network. This will hurt the recovery of the Republican party. Thoughts.
 
ZeroEm said:
This will hurt the recovery of the Republican party. Thoughts.
Click to expand...

Whatever hurts them is okay by me, in proportion to how badly it hurts them.
 
leisesturm said:
Yo, 'D', on the serious ... do you notice that even those of us that disagree mightily with your POV ... none of us have ever called you stupid?
Click to expand...

As a matter of fact, NO, I haven't noticed that. Do you know WHY? Because it's NOT TRUE! (Imagine my surprise, coming from you.) Moderators have commented on my patience and at least LESS of that in response from me.

Hey, Nicotine, think of all the fun you could have reliving all those many times YOU did. You were WRONG, but you don't let that stop you any more than it stops. . . .

Oh, and lame storm, why don't you have the same fun? It doesn't have to be the word stupid, it can be ANY of the words you used.

Would you rather that I used the expression 'Insincere horse laugh?' To me, insincerity is a form of stupidity. Like you calling people "Blind" to call them stupid. Lying is a form of calling the person or persons you're lying to way too stupid to see through you. You call us all stupid in most any post you make.

We need more duct tape to keep you on that wall.
 
I think Populist is more like hate and not stupidity. But it maybe more like lack of empathy but now we could be getting in to the brains chemistry. There we have it, it's a chemical imbalance.
 
ZeroEm said:
I think Populist is more like hate and not stupidity. But it maybe more like lack of empathy but now we could be getting in to the brains chemistry. There we have it, it's a chemical imbalance.
Click to expand...

But it's your own hate and lack of empathy taking advantage of the opportunity to preach that. All part of the flying monkey manifesto. Enjoy deriding what you dream up to deride, monkeys, , enjoy, ENJOY!
 
2024 state of the trump:

  • Trump will be further in serious mental decline that is clearly observable to us today vis a vis his former self from the TV series until now (2020)
  • Trump would be the oldest Presidential candidate ever if he were to attempt it (Sleepy Joe? You ain't seen sleepy yet)
  • Trump will likely be in jail (or hiding out in Russia/North Korea)

M
 
Biden would have declined more so. By 2023 he'll only be a puppet, reading exclusively from teleprompter if his eyesight doesnt get worse, but they can do amazing things these days with eyesight surgery.

MJSfoto1956 said:
2024

  • serious mental decline that is clearly observable to us today
    M
Click to expand...
 
nicobie said:
It's not fair or right to enter into a battle of wits with somebody that has none.

Sorry daunti. Try not to wear out your keyboard. Your fingertips must be bloody by now...
Click to expand...

Don't call me unfair, I've never entered into a battle of wits with you, it's always you starting it and losing. As long as you drag me into it, it's perfectly fair no matter how bad your nosebleed is.

So, Biden presidency, let's see. First he lives his fantasy of a REAL iron handed lockdown. 6 weeks. Think of what THAT does to the economy. Then he tries the Obama trick of raising an unlimited debt ceiling and just spending and spending and spending and spending. . . .

. . . . But the same Republican Senate that won't let him triple taxes won't let him spend like Obama, or worse. And Biden cries publicly.

Maybe he'll console himself with 'Bring your child to work day,' where White House staff are required to take turns bringing their children to work to meet the president. Won't THAT be fun for him.

So 2022 election, GOP takeover. Maybe even 60 Senate seats. Biden cries and screams "No fair," Kamala asks who she has to sleep with to fix this and they remind her that her days of sleeping her way to the top ended in the 1990's, whenever they actually did, don't know the actual date.

So come 2024, Biden promises he'll dump Harris if he's just renominated. So Harris threatens him and he starts with "No I didnt/yes I did/no I didn't. . . ." Meanwhile, Bernie supporters are telling him don't ever concede, I don't know, maybe he'll get the nomination this time.

To run against Trump as the Not Trump candidate. . . .
 
Nicobie do not waste your time getting into a pissing match with a idiot. You will sink to his level and he has more experience. Being a idiot that is. Plus using the ignore feature you do not have to listen to his mindless juvenile drivel. Although you will see his same old retorts to others posts.
 
Dang, Slack, I know you're still pretending you're not snorting my posts thru a straw, but what do you think of the comparison of Trump to Juan Peron? You've seen 'Evita,' right?

Military coup sends popular president into exile, later he returns triumphantly, pissing off the Socialist who've been killing people. History may not repeat itself, but as Mark Twain said, it often rhymes.

[youtube]KD_1Z8iUDho[/youtube]
 
Anything is possible, so post your expectations.
My guess is trump will declare a state of emergency, saying the WH staff is infected with covid, and that he won't allow Biden et al come into the WH out of "safety" concerns. or simply that the election was rigged, and he won in reality.
 
markz said:
Biden would have declined more so. By 2023 he'll only be a puppet, reading exclusively from teleprompter if his eyesight doesnt get worse, but they can do amazing things these days with eyesight surgery.
Click to expand...

He won't even be President by then. Don't you see that this is all just a setup to put the radical in the oval office. The China and Russia stuff will force him out with the radical giving him a pardon just like Ford did Nixon.
 
John in CR said:
He won't even be President by then. Don't you see that this is all just a setup to put the radical in the oval office.
Click to expand...

What radical? There was never a radical allowed into the discussion on the Democratic side.
 
Balmorhea said:
John in CR said:
He won't even be President by then. Don't you see that this is all just a setup to put the radical in the oval office.
Click to expand...

What radical? There was never a radical allowed into the discussion on the Democratic side.
Click to expand...

The likely soon to be Vice President Elect.
 
John in CR said:
Balmorhea said:
John in CR said:
He won't even be President by then. Don't you see that this is all just a setup to put the radical in the oval office.
Click to expand...

What radical? There was never a radical allowed into the discussion on the Democratic side.
Click to expand...

The likely soon to be Vice President Elect.
Click to expand...

You're delusional. She's pathologically Establishment, or she'd never have made the cut.

This is like hearing chuds call Obama a socialist. All it does is discredit the chud who says it.
 
Balmorhea said:
John in CR said:
Balmorhea said:
John in CR said:
He won't even be President by then. Don't you see that this is all just a setup to put the radical in the oval office.
Click to expand...
What radical? There was never a radical allowed into the discussion on the Democratic side.
Click to expand...
The likely soon to be Vice President Elect.
Click to expand...
You're delusional. She's pathologically Establishment, or she'd never have made the cut.

This is like hearing chuds call Obama a socialist. All it does is discredit the chud who says it.
Click to expand...

You are pathologically discrediting yourself. There have always been radicals allowed in the Democratic discussion. Perhaps you've heard of 'The Squad.' Nina Turner. Stacey Abrams. Perhaps you've heard of quite a number of elected Democrats. Dangerously radical and threatening IS establishment in the Democratic party.

Perhaps you heard something about we were having a presidential election recently. Had you paid closer attention you'd have realized she was the most personally unpopular candidate running for the Democratic nomination. Perhaps you'd have caught where GovTrack and others rated her more radical than Bernie Sanders, the most radical senator, Newsweek and others discussing her that way. . . .

https://www.aol.com/finance/presidentelect-bidens-tax-plan-will-likely-make-companies-leave-the-us-nyc-billionaire-businessman-catsimatidis-163719916.html

nicobie said:
Harris did a good job in CA.
Click to expand...

Sure did meet her personal goals for locking up black people. At least you found something you can like.

nicobie said:
that's about as good as it gets.
Click to expand...
 
Balmorhea said:
John in CR said:
Balmorhea said:
John in CR said:
He won't even be President by then. Don't you see that this is all just a setup to put the radical in the oval office.
Click to expand...

What radical? There was never a radical allowed into the discussion on the Democratic side.
Click to expand...

The likely soon to be Vice President Elect.
Click to expand...

You're delusional. She's pathologically Establishment, or she'd never have made the cut.

This is like hearing chuds call Obama a socialist. All it does is discredit the chud who says it.
Click to expand...

While we obviously have a different opinion about what radical means (in this case radical left dem), you obviously are clueless about who you vote for. Just like I schooled you on hubmotors, you'll see in this case too. She's way out there left...Green New Deal, Medicare for All, against deportation of illegal immigrants, etc.
 
Well, we may not know what Trump will do on 1/20/20, but we know what he is doing right now. Just yesterday he invited two Michigan congresscritters to Washington, that he attempted to convince to throw out their states election and draft a new slate of Electors bound to him. He has more states on his list.

If Obama had lost outright in 2012, and had attempted to bribe or blackmail his way into a second term, do you think we would be laughing about it???? I'm not seeing enough pushback on the part of Biden and other Democrats at this NAKED subversion of Democratic principles. I think ANY governor or lawmaker that accepts Trump's invitation to even discuss overturning their states election results should face impeachment or re-call, whichever applies.

Talk about stirring the pot. No matter how this goes: win, lose, or draw, people are going to die. Lives are literally hanging in the balance as militias mobilize to either avenge a certified Trump defeat, or quell the inevitable outrage at a sham Trump victory. What worries me most is that as much loathing as there is for Trump, deep down, the overwhelming sentiment is for Republican values to dominate. Y'all's don't really want Biden to prevail. You might tolerate a hamstrung Biden who can't get much done because of a hostile Congress but Trump won't. For Trump there is only winning this thing or ... ... winning this thing.
 
John in CR said:
She's way out there left...Green New Deal, Medicare for All, against deportation of illegal immigrants, etc.
Click to expand...

What is ... 'bad' about ANY of these policies? Even the deportations! There is nothing good about taking children from their parents and KEEPING THEM HERE for years while deporting their parents without even a hearing. Why not just deport the entire family? Why not just close the borders? Don't let ANYONE in. Except white Europeans. I've got no problem with that. I do have a problem with rounding up and incarcerating non-white immigrants and holding them in detention for years without any charges. I have a problem with deporting only parents and giving their lawful progeny to STRANGERS! That is inhumane and illegal. Two wrongs don't make a right.
 
leisesturm said:
John in CR said:
She's way out there left...Green New Deal, Medicare for All, against deportation of illegal immigrants, etc.
Click to expand...

What is ... 'bad' about ANY of these policies? Even the deportations! There is nothing good about taking children from their parents and KEEPING THEM HERE for years while deporting their parents without even a hearing. Why not just deport the entire family? Why not just close the borders? Don't let ANYONE in. Except white Europeans. I've got no problem with that. I do have a problem with rounding up and incarcerating non-white immigrants and holding them in detention for years without any charges. I have a problem with deporting only parents and giving their lawful progeny to STRANGERS! That is inhumane and illegal. Two wrongs don't make a right.
Click to expand...

I didn't say anything about deporting parents and keeping their kids, of course that shouldn't happen. You forget Obama built the cages, but just like if you get arrested your kids don't get to come in the cell with you, and no one should want that. You people aren't thinking things thru. Trump has made real attempts to end illegal entry, which is the only correct solution, and I see absolutely nothing wrong with the military being part of border security.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top