Nice work Dave!
So the idea with the 2nd gen is that it will house more lubricant and be contained? Personally I really don't mind the shoot .5ml in the motor at your regular maintenance-idea. If it wasn't for that I'm sure I'd be skipping my necessary chain maint.... that's just how it goes for me lol.
What spurred you to change things up with the design?
Were you trying to eliminate steps/streamline machining and assembly/reduce number of components? Or were you having concerns about longevity of the 1st gen? I've had nothing but fun on mine.
The idea for a bolted side plate is just a thought. I'd prefer not to have to undo-redo the threaded portion of the BB, it seems like one of those components that isn't really meant to be on/off cycled. Those delicate little threads always scare me. In reality it's not like I find myself needing to take the motor off with any regular frequency. It's just a situation that I was faced with this summer.
The way that I imagine it, the half that stays on the bike wouldn't need to be very big. It could still be retained and wouldn't get in the way because it would be within the diameter of the chain ring. And in my particular case it's needed since it holds the chain roller/guide. I attached a crappy ms paint pic depicting how I imagine it. The areas between the red arcs depict an area where the removable and the affixed portions of the plate might overlap for lateral torsion resistance(maybe even a close tolerance shoulder incorporated so that the two sections of the plate where they mate might add resistance to radial force) . Red circles indicate where a few bolts might hold things together.
I'm not saying or suggesting there is any demand here for this, it's just something I thought about for my bike. I one of those guys who likes to ride his own kit. I like the familiarity and memories to me made be on my bike. So it got me thinking about how I could take my bike and ride it as electric and DH next year, and not have to rent.
The one thing that I'm really searching long and hard for is a bulletproof SS 24T chain ring for the crank. The aluminum ones from sick bike are just too soft imo for the kind of power this thing puts down, and the non standard bolt pattern is a concern for off the shelf components.
The fat bike crank pic from your site has a different inner chain ring and spider. Is that standard bicycle bolt hole spacing?
IS that spider something that would bolt on to the sick bike parts UHD freewheel? What is the BSD of the spider? Does this spider lead to an altered chain line?
So the idea with the 2nd gen is that it will house more lubricant and be contained? Personally I really don't mind the shoot .5ml in the motor at your regular maintenance-idea. If it wasn't for that I'm sure I'd be skipping my necessary chain maint.... that's just how it goes for me lol.
What spurred you to change things up with the design?
Were you trying to eliminate steps/streamline machining and assembly/reduce number of components? Or were you having concerns about longevity of the 1st gen? I've had nothing but fun on mine.
The idea for a bolted side plate is just a thought. I'd prefer not to have to undo-redo the threaded portion of the BB, it seems like one of those components that isn't really meant to be on/off cycled. Those delicate little threads always scare me. In reality it's not like I find myself needing to take the motor off with any regular frequency. It's just a situation that I was faced with this summer.
The way that I imagine it, the half that stays on the bike wouldn't need to be very big. It could still be retained and wouldn't get in the way because it would be within the diameter of the chain ring. And in my particular case it's needed since it holds the chain roller/guide. I attached a crappy ms paint pic depicting how I imagine it. The areas between the red arcs depict an area where the removable and the affixed portions of the plate might overlap for lateral torsion resistance(maybe even a close tolerance shoulder incorporated so that the two sections of the plate where they mate might add resistance to radial force) . Red circles indicate where a few bolts might hold things together.
I'm not saying or suggesting there is any demand here for this, it's just something I thought about for my bike. I one of those guys who likes to ride his own kit. I like the familiarity and memories to me made be on my bike. So it got me thinking about how I could take my bike and ride it as electric and DH next year, and not have to rent.
The one thing that I'm really searching long and hard for is a bulletproof SS 24T chain ring for the crank. The aluminum ones from sick bike are just too soft imo for the kind of power this thing puts down, and the non standard bolt pattern is a concern for off the shelf components.
The fat bike crank pic from your site has a different inner chain ring and spider. Is that standard bicycle bolt hole spacing?
IS that spider something that would bolt on to the sick bike parts UHD freewheel? What is the BSD of the spider? Does this spider lead to an altered chain line?