keyne said:
I had thought of sealing it well and flooding it with a small amount of oil to use the rotor to conduct away a bit of heat too, but I hadn't thought about how that would also help reduce the delta T - that's a good idea.
keyne said:
I'd rather not use anything that could potentially leak out. Something that sets on the windings and stator would be ideal - hence why I'm moving towards thermal epoxy. Water isn't actually that good in terms of thermal conductivity, though it is better than oils.
From wikipedia:
Water : 0.6 [W/(m•K)]
Alcohols and oils : 0.1 - 0.21 [W/(m•K)]
The thermal epoxy I'm thinking of using is about 1.25 [W/(m•K)]
The desire to avoid leakage is certainly valid and a good enough reason in its own right to avoid flooding the motor body - I wouldn't have suggested it if you had not already volunteered it as a solution you were considering.
As far as the thermal conductivity is concerned, the figures you quote are for static heat propagation and are not directly applicable to situations with circulating coolants where specific heat is the primary characteristic in play. Beyond that and regardless of any Wpedia spec, you are already successfully water cooling and are currently battling the thermal barrier of the conduction necessary to get the heat from the windings to the coolant (your delta-T is measured across this barrier). Adding epoxy may reduce the thermal barrier in that its thermal conductivity is better than air, but it cannot be as effective as eliminating the barrier (heat conduction path) by allowing direct contact of the coolant with the windings.
I think if you are embracing a specific design and want to pursue the epoxy, then you should do so if for no other reason than 'just because'. There are reasons to shy away from flooding the motor, but the Wpedia thermal conductivity argument doesn't seem to be one of them.