RoughRider said:
a question?
this graph from bob...do i read it right...the cells do NOT deliver the full 10Ah??
but BMI says on the webside that the cells will deliver the full Ah and a bit more...
i dont think, that is makes sense to buy such expensive cells...
even WHEN they can do the 3000cycles...what do i need it for?? what do i need 3000cycles for??
what is the price of one cell?? 40$?? 3,2V+10Ah= 32Wh = 0,8Wh/$...
thundersky / sky energy: 44$ for 3,2*40AH= 128Wh ==> 2,9Wh/$....more than 3 time of BMI
lets think, they last for 2000cycles...at least 1500cycles...
so, that means, at least 5years or even longer....
EXAMPLE OF A PACK
lets see for a 48V 40Ah pack:
BMI: 60cells => 2400$ only for the cells
SE / TS: 15cells: 660$
i save 1740$
BMS comes on top...more cells for BMI means more expensive BMS ... price on ebay from BMI for 48V and 10Ah with BMS: 990$...so you will pay near 4000$ for the pack of 40Ah...and TS / SE pack less than 1000$
in 5years when my TS/SE-pack is down at 80%...i can buy a new one, maybe with new / better cells and the prices will be down at maybe half of the price today because of mass production...
so buying the BMI cells means, to have very much of dead capital...
better put your money to the bank and let it work for you at 4% in 5 years it will be over 700$ and that means, that you got your batterypack from TS or SE cells FOR FREE...compare to BMI
think about that...
BMI cells are true 10Ah rated cells. Please remember that the cell under test is brand new and will slightly increase its capacity once it is cycles a few times. LiFePO4 cells also gain capacity in warm weather.
Speak to people who are actually using the batteries and have REAL LIFE experience with them as to their capacity test results.
micro13car has said his pack delivers 11Ah and this is just one of many examples since micro13car brought this up himself earlier in this thread.
There are many differences between Thundersky and BMI batteries. TS are a low discharge rate cell which are rated at less than 5C while BMI cells will provide more than double this continously and 20C peaks. Therefore you need an extremely large TS battery to be able to gain enough useable capacity which is why they are limited to car conversions.
I am yet to see Thundersky batteries being used to power an e-bike or e-motorcycle but please correct me if I am wrong!
They are vastly different technologies in the battery management area. I have personally been told by a professional EV conversion company they don't like the TS BMS with the loose wires on the top of the battery and the fact the batteries must be installed upright.
This is not the case with BMI batteries. They can be installed in any orientation at all including upside down.
The VMS is far more sophisticated and has many advanced features which are far ahead of what TS uses in their BMS. The VMS is concealed inside the battery so there are no loose exposed wires as is the case with the Thundersky batteries
Does a TS battery have the ability to perform an automatic test of every cell in a large bank of batteries and perform this test automatically up to twice a day as can a BMI battery? Then if any cell in any individual battery is found to be out of specification or in some way requires attention or checking the owner of the battery can be sent a SMS text message to his phone or an email sent to him alerting him to check the battery in his electric vehicle and indicating the exact cell in the battery which requires attention?
The fact is the Chinese battery companies just don't have the technology yet to be able to manufacture very high quality LiFePO4 batteries. Unless you see how the cells are manufactured in the BMI factory you would not have any understanding of the complexity and why all cells are not the same (and why quality cells like BMI cost more).
This has resulted in the unfortunate case which I see only too often where people have outlayed many hundereds (if not thousands)of dollars on lithium battery packs from China only to have them prematurely fail.
Of course this has resulted in so many people being wary of LiFePO4 batteries. It is extremely difficult (from my point of view) to regain the confidence of people who are wary due to their bad expriences. Perhaps you fall into this category of people RoughRider which is why you appear to be so negative? I perfectly understand this and it is human nature to buy the "cheapest" of anything. But then when you do buy the "cheapest" and you find that it doesn't perform as expected and/or fails prematurely you are left with a sour taste in your mouth.
This is why I always say when it comes to LiFePO4 batteries to buy as good a quality as you can afford. Of course I totally accept not everyone can afford top quality LiFePO4 batteries but if you can afford them buy them. The principal objective should be to buy on quality and not on price...... unless you want to risk being left with a sour taste in your mouth.
The manufacturers warranty is important in showing the customer the manufacturer stands behind their product. This is why the 3-5 years/3000 cycle life warranty offered by BMI is to my knowledge the longest offered by any LiFePO4 battery manufacturer.
I have often wondered why Thundersky aren't prepared to stand behind their product and provide a similar manfacturers warranty? The 12 months only warranty seems inadequate for such an expensive outlay of batteries as required to fit out a full size EV conversion. From what I understand the manufacturer (Thundersky) does't provide any warranty whatsoever. The warranty offered is provided by the distributor in the country of sale because they are required by law to provide some kind of warranty which is the case in many western countries. I am talking about specifically in Australia here and the situation may be different in other western countries which understandibly I would not be familiar with.
I was recently made aware by a professional EV conversion company of a case where a car fitted with Thundersky batteries caught on fire in the owners garage while charging. The car was purchased from a professional EV conversion company so it was no "backyard job". The woman from Melbourne was charging her car overnight in her garage and it caught on fire somtime while it was on charge. It is not clear if the fire started in the batteries, BMS or charger but the fact is this was a TS supplied installation.
I am not aware of any case of a similar fire involving BMI batteries in any installation. If we take a worst case scenario and the BMI batteries were involved in a fire (perhaps such as if the car was involved in an accident) any such flames would soon self extinguish due to the flame retardant DuPont Xytel battery cases which BMI batteries are manufactured from.
It is the much high quality materials which go into the manufacture of BMI batteries which is why they cost more so it is not an equal playing field to simply compare batteries of the same AH capacity on price alone (as RoughRider is trying to do) without taking into account the quality of materials used in their manufacture.
BMI cells use LiFePO4 powder manufactured under licence in Germany from the patent holder of LiFePO4 battery technology (Phostech).
Common sense would say that any product (not only batteries) will be of better quality and provide superior performance when it comes from the person/company who actually invented it (and therefore has the most experience with it) compared to the same product which has come along some time later as a result of being copied in China (often to less than a satisfactory standard).