OK guys, I'm back.
First off, despite having been a member of this forum for a couple of years or so, I had absolutely no idea who this 'Randy Draper' chap was or what he'd apparently done in the past - in fact I'm still not at all clear what it is he's specifically done, apart from behave badly towards Matt on another forum (sorry if you took my refusal to condemn him as taking sides, Matt, I was simply trying to stay neutral). I take people at face value unless I have reason not too, and to be completely honest I have to switch in some extra 'tolerance filtering' when reading stuff on multi-national fora like this one, because the cultural differences between us all mean that I'd maybe take offence at quite a lot of stuff if I didn't. For example, normal 'in your face' directness from some parts of the US can seem pretty rude to us Brits - we're just wired up differently.................
Anyway, good find, Bigmoose. John Fiorenza at Mars Electric is a good guy, I've done business with him and he really goes out of his way to be helpful to customers, so I'd not hesitate to buy from him again. For those who don't know the background, John Fiorenza worked for, or with, Briggs and Stratton on the Etek project, I believe. When B&S decided to kill that project, he seems to have set up his own company and has his motors built in China. I'm pretty sure that most of the motor design is done by Mars Electric LLC, with just production undertaken in China, taking advantage of their low labour rates.
It looks very much as if the motor that Randy told us about is actually the Mars ME0206020001, minus the gearbox, as you've worked out. My guess is that he was either buying them from Mars Electric LLC, or maybe out of the back door from the factory in China. It's even possible (maybe even probable) that another Chinese company has cloned the Mars motor; it's the sort of thing that happens a lot in the Far East.
Anyway, the way to get the specs is to ask John Fiorenza, so I'll email him and ask. Based on my previous experience of dealing with him I suspect I'll be able to get the full spec, with motor curves etc so that we can see what potential this motor has. With it's relatively large diameter and modest weight (it seems to be around 5 lbs without the gearbox) it seems to have a fair bit of potential. What is clear is that the data I was working with yesterday is flawed. I can't prove it, but I strongly suspect that the supposed 'dyno results' table was doctored, as the numbers just don't stack up as they stand.
An axial flux design is quite appealing for us tinkerers, for a host of reasons. It's potentially easier to rewind than a conventional stator, has rectangular slots, so will take rectangular wire for a better copper fill, can have an easily adjustable air gap, it should be simpler to fit adjustable position Hall sensors and, based on the internal photos, it looks like it would safely spin up to a pretty high rpm. It also looks more robust, easy to mount and has no externally rotating can.
Jeremy