The reason I asked whether they were full suspension was because I was wondering if chain growth could have been a factor. That's very interesting. I keep reading everywhere that you get lower rolling resistance with lower tire pressures, which goes against what I've always thought, that higher pressures equate to lower rolling resistance but I understand why it is the case because lower pressures should allow you to roll over obstacles instead of being affected by them. Maybe 8 psi on a fat bike is too low regarding that rule or the terrain has something to do with it.
Prior to 11-speed, Shimano's rear derailleur design has always used an upper pulley that doesn't change its distance from the cassette as the cage rotates. Because of this, when you adjust the B screw, it makes shifting in all the other gears worse. Adding the Goat Link doesn't really fix the main issue because it only moves the derailleur a set distance away. In Sram's design (since Type 2.1), the rotation of the cage moves the upper pulley closer and farther away from the cassette. This makes shifting much smoother without requiring anything like the Goat Link or unusual B screw adjustments. This is why OneUp makes a Rad cage. It makes a Shimano derailleur behave like a Sram.
So I think the best solution if you're running a 10-speed system is to get a Sram Type 2.1 rear derailleur or run a Shimano with a Rad cage. The Goat Link is just a bandaid, and Wolftooth probably couldn't offer a new cage because of OneUp's patent. I'm currently using a Sram X9 Type 2.1, and it works perfectly with a 42 (other than the 16T not being as buttery smooth to shift in and out of compared to the other Shimano cogs but that's what happens when you mess with Shimano's perfectly designed cassettes).
Thanks for showing me the Wolftooth 49! I'm a fan of Wolftooth since I have their 42T. I just looked at the 42, and it has 6 shift gates, so I see why they say 7 would be better for the 49, although I wonder if there was a reason they couldn't make a 50 (maybe a patent issue). Ideally, they would sell both and let the customer decide. The OneUp 50T has 4 shift gates, so it would only take a quarter turn of the wheel, which is nothing, so I wonder how much of that is marketing speak. I mean it might matter in a race, but to us I don't know. 49 is also even closer to 46, so one might ask why not just get the Shimano 11-46 in order to preserve Shimano's awesome shifting performance.
I'm seriously considering the BBSHD because of how quiet it is. If Luna has a black Friday sale, I might just have to snatch one up. I'd have to get their Eclipse 44T chainring to correct the chainline, so because of that, I'm going to have to go with one of these large cog cassette options. I was originally leaning towards the OneUp 50, but now you've made my decision harder =) in a good way though, I think. If Wolftooth offer's theirs in blue, I might just get theirs instead =)
You say it's going to be destroyed by the Cyclone, but if you take advantage of the new ratios either by reducing the size of the motor crankset chainring or increasing the size of the bicycle crankset chainring, you will be able to run lower chain tensions.
Programming the Bluetooth controller should be really easy with the App. I've made a post about it, so hopefully someone that has tried it will comment.
If you go the route of making your own cassette, it may not shift as smooth as a Shimano because Shimano uses carefully placed gates. Plus, the 41T has zero shift gates. If you want to stick with an 8-speed system, the Sram EX1 that Dingus mentioned earlier might be worth looking into, although it's super expensive.
https://www.sram.com/sram/mountain/products/xg-899-e-block-cassette
Also, Gman doesn't have a CA3. He has the older one. I'm using a CA3 with the Cyclone, and I haven't noticed anything unusual. If you use it to limit your current from 40 amps to 30 or 35 amps, it should work great for that purpose. I bought the potentiometer for my CA3, and I have it setup to limit current. It worked great for when I was using my 2015 GNG mid drive temporarily while I was waiting for the hall sensors for the Cyclone. Although I think the best way to do it is to program the controller. I might have to get one of those to play with.
sather said:
Robocam:
Both bikes are hard tails.
Fat bikes require much more energy at 8psi than a mountain bike at 40psi. When I smoked my motor and had to pedal home, I quickly got tired of 8psi and stopped and pumped up the tires to 35psi. The ride got harsh but the effort to pedal was dramatically less. Plus, add an extra 50lbs of body weight and you have a combination that smokes motors and freewheels, especially on steep climbs.
I have installed longer "B" screws only to have them bend. I even drilled and tapped the derailleur for a larger diameter "B" screw so it wouldn't bend. The best solution is the Goat link. The purpose of the Wolf tooth Goat Link is so you don't have to use a longer "B" screw. Too bad the Goat Link will only fit Shimano 10 speed derailleurs, not 8-9 speeds.
Wolf tooth has a 49 tooth ($120) coming that they claim is better than the Shark Cage 50t ($120). Add the cost of the 11 speed derailleur, shifter and chain. The experiments total cost is over $225 and probably would be destroyed by the Cyclone. I am considering it for my BBSHD however.
Wolf Tooth Components GC 49 Cog/WolfCage Bundles - 11 Speed Shimano
https://www.universalcycles.com/shopping/product_details.php?id=83647&category=1569
My Holy Grail is going the other direction. An 8 or 9 speed cassette starting at 15t or 16t and going up has high as possible. Check out the Miche first position cogs and Miche 9 speed cassette that allows substitution of cogs. I plan to go from 16t up to 41t. Even higher if I can fabricate my own Goat Link.
https://www.universalcycles.com/shopping/product_details.php?id=14087&category=1569
https://www.universalcycles.com/shopping/product_details.php?id=9741&category=41
I only "ghost pedal" for stealth. With higher voltage you are still going to have to restrict amps either by shunt mod or custom programming. I'm not sure if I have enough knowledge to program the Luna or Lyen controller. Especially for phase amps. Right now, I am going to monitor temps and be careful. If my son smokes the Cyclone on his bike I will look into restricting amps.
I don't know whether the CA3 or the Lyen 4110 is to blame for jerky throttle response. Karl at electricbike-blog.com Quote: "The Lyen 18 Fet controller runs about $200 directly from Lyen, but in all honesty, I can’t recommend it. It is incredibly large, stupidly heavy, and the power delivery is pretty jerky (and not beef jerky either, more like twerky). The controllers are a royal pain to program"
Gman has observed the same jerky throttle response in the CA3/Lyen and has a theory. You might pm him.