I have a very small low angle 1/8" wide chisel that easily gets under the 0.1mm SS, and a little twist and pry popped it off the copper pretty easily, and or lifts it enough to get the side cut pliers in there. I've not done this intentionally at scale though.
I respect math, but I tend to just go overboard on busbar width and thickness, as I want my busbars to be heatsinks, rather than heatsources, as much as is possible, within reason.
I use 0.2mm copper in applications where 0.15mm nickel would be 'just fine' on paper.
I am personally not seeking 'just enough' or weight savings.
I will double fishpaper ring and overlap the cathode well before limiting busbar width.
I'll buy 100mm+ wide rolls of copper or stainless and cut to fit with capable tin snips.
I think a lot of people looks at a cell's theoretical max CDR and try to size their busbars for that, when in actual use that power level will be very short lived and the 0.6mm copper that seems to be required on paper, is well excessive in actual use.
I respect math, but I tend to just go overboard on busbar width and thickness, as I want my busbars to be heatsinks, rather than heatsources, as much as is possible, within reason.
I use 0.2mm copper in applications where 0.15mm nickel would be 'just fine' on paper.
I am personally not seeking 'just enough' or weight savings.
I will double fishpaper ring and overlap the cathode well before limiting busbar width.
I'll buy 100mm+ wide rolls of copper or stainless and cut to fit with capable tin snips.
I think a lot of people looks at a cell's theoretical max CDR and try to size their busbars for that, when in actual use that power level will be very short lived and the 0.6mm copper that seems to be required on paper, is well excessive in actual use.













