For me, repairable and rebuildable batteries are way more rad than ones that are glued into a 100% disposable lump. But for folks who have no intention of ever repairing anything, sure.Potted batteries, very rad!
UL 2271 does not have any puncture or thermal runaway test. It is mostly electrical and software tests to ensure the BMS functions properly. The mechanical tests are shock and vibration (similar to UN 38.3), drop, and a few others. The ingress protection tests are very lax. There are also a bunch of requirements to ensure that all of the materials are from suppliers that are also paying UL.Well, it does pass UL tests, as do nonpotted packs, and since UL won't let the public know (withouut paying for the standards) what the tests actually are, their mystery continues. Maybe the epoxy makes a puncture test impossible,
I'd venture that most people on this forum doing repairs on batteries (their own or others) are not doing them right--many seem to start by recharging low cells either individually or bypassing a BMS that has shutoff the pack because of cell problems, instead of replacing the problematic cells/groups. (even when advised that this is not the safest way to fix the pack).Few people doing repairs are knowledgeable and careful enough to send out a safe pack.
Alas ..![]()
Rad Power Bikes unveils 4 new e-bikes & faster speeds in biggest shakeup yet
Rad Power Bikes, the Seattle-based electric bike maker that spent years at the top of the US e-bike sellers list,...electrek.co
View attachment 348557
I have one of those batteries under the boom of an HPV FS26 powering a Phaserunner and MAC 10T @ 40A.I had a very early potted Luna battery, and it has functioned perfectly. The main value of the potting (AFAIK) was it prevented thermal progression. It's kind of a moot point since I haven't seen Luna's batteries for sale (except for their X1 &Z1 or whatever bikes) in several years.